should first class on planes have ejector seats and parachutes?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

would you pay extra for a parachute

  • yes

  • no

  • only if made by acme


Results are only viewable after voting.
Nov 7, 2000
16,403
3
81
the cost to install and test outweighs the benefit

virtually none of them will ever be used and it is not critical for the actual operation of the aircraft
 

brainhulk

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2007
9,376
454
126
the cost to install and test outweighs the benefit

virtually none of them will ever be used and it is not critical for the actual operation of the aircraft

Say a plane has all it's hydraulics go out, it could still slow down enough to let first class jump
 

MaxPayne63

Senior member
Dec 19, 2011
682
0
0
Coach should have ejectors and first class should be able to trigger them while watching through a camera for $1000 a pop.
 

sourceninja

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2005
8,805
65
91
We spend way too much time obsessing over things that happen to .00000000000000000000000000000000001% of us rather than trying to solve the real dangers to 25%+ of us.

IE, school shootings vs every other preventable thing that kills children every single day.

calling a few dozen deaths a huge moment in history compared to the thousands starving to death on the same day all over the world.

ETC.
 

Childs

Lifer
Jul 9, 2000
11,313
7
81
If I actually ponied up for first class, I'd want one of those presidential escape pods from Escape from New York. And I'd expect a stewardess and some lobster inside waiting for me.
 

AmdEmAll

Diamond Member
Aug 27, 2000
6,699
9
81
Instead of saving the rich and privileged, how about a whole-plane parachute system? I think they're actually working on one now.

48711main_brs_parachute.jpg

Has been out for decades..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_Recovery_Systems
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
Instead of simply being beamed to your original destination from said lounge? :p

It's too new and specialized and still risky, so it can only be justified in a dire emergency.

It will be many decades before it's reliable and cheap for everyday use. :)
 

randomrogue

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2011
5,449
0
0
Only in America would people worry about stupid shit like this. Something like 200 people die a year GLOBALLY in aviation accidents (with 2001 being an outlier). It's so damn safe that there's nothing to even talk about.

Flying is the safest form of travel.
 

brainhulk

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2007
9,376
454
126
Only in America would people worry about stupid shit like this. Something like 200 people die a year GLOBALLY in aviation accidents (with 2001 being an outlier). It's so damn safe that there's nothing to even talk about.

Flying is the safest form of travel.

that's something only people that can't afford 1st class parachutes say :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

norseamd

Lifer
Dec 13, 2013
13,990
180
106
you realize that ejection seats in a jumbo jet would never work right. if you can come up with a workable model you might be able to make a lot of money. as for parachutes thought they already did but maybe they might not.

parachutes are definitly a good idea to have on a plane for all passengers
 

bruceb

Diamond Member
Aug 20, 2004
8,874
111
106
It will not help you. At the typical 30,000 to 38,000 foot cruising altitude, you have no oxygen and the air is extremely cold. You would end up dead. And ejecting from an out of control plane is tricky or you could be hit by the plane. Fighter pilots are trained in how to eject and they still get some injuries when doing it.
 

brainhulk

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2007
9,376
454
126
It will not help you. At the typical 30,000 to 38,000 foot cruising altitude, you have no oxygen and the air is extremely cold. You would end up dead. And ejecting from an out of control plane is tricky or you could be hit by the plane. Fighter pilots are trained in how to eject and they still get some injuries when doing it.

Ejector pods with parachutes. :colbert:

Soyuz_TMA-17_retro-rockects_firing_during_landing.jpg


And people say it would be too expensive but it would be totally funded by 1st class ticket prices
 

z1ggy

Lifer
May 17, 2008
10,010
66
91
You'd never be able to engineer it. Like it was said before, to even make a jump you need to be going below a certain speed and altitude, or if not you need special equipment to make it humanly possible.
 

brainhulk

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2007
9,376
454
126
You'd never be able to engineer it. Like it was said before, to even make a jump you need to be going below a certain speed and altitude, or if not you need special equipment to make it humanly possible.

If Soyuz capsules can survive atmospheric entry from space, it can be done
 

z1ggy

Lifer
May 17, 2008
10,010
66
91
If Soyuz capsules can survive atmospheric entry from space, it can be done

I was talking about a human being jumping from a moving object in the sky, not some NASA engineered spacecraft that's built to withstand temps of several hundred degrees.

Either way, if the people on mh370 could have somehow all jumped with 'chutes then survived hitting the water, they'd still have a lot of other things to worry about.