• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

should equal time be given at political speeches?

Status
Not open for further replies.
rudeguy

rudeguy

Lifer
For instance, after Obama said that Republicans didn't want black folks to vote or after Biden said that Republicans were taking foreign money.

Should equal time be given to dispute such lies?
 
rudeguy said:
For instance, after Obama said that Republicans didn't want black folks to vote or after Biden said that Republicans were taking foreign money.

Should equal time be given to dispute such lies?
Click to expand...

It wouldn't matter as those attending the speech will be voting for whomever is speaking or the candidate of the party they represent.
 
If it's something like the upcoming televised Town Hall meetings by BET and a bunch of Viacom stations, then I think absolutely. Otherwise it should be considered a campaign donation in kind. If it's a regular Presidential address like the State of the Union and it isn't overtly political, then I think not. The President is the President and the other party needs to man up and bear it - except when he is campaigning.

If I were making rules I'd say any time less than sixty days before a primary or a general election, the President can be considered to be campaigning.
 
Absolutely no. Any person has the right on the First Amendment to make a political speech to his/her followers-it's been that way since the origin of this country. Equal time rules applied only mass media regulated by the FCC and basically only apply to media appearances by legally registered candidates.


In fairness the problem you perceive has already been solved without a need to trample upon the Constitution. There are already rules in place that provide if the President is traveling to a political event he does that on his own dime (or his party's) not the country's. So take comfort that your tax dollars are not paying for Obama's rally speeches and fund raisers-I took the same comfort when GWB did the same.
 
For what?


So Lincoln can give his Gettysburg address, and then we can call take a nap for 2 hours so "his" time is equal to that of the speech given by Edward Everett?




Sorry: If there was any real substance to the vapid, partisan shit that passes for "Political Speech" nowadays there wouldn't be any need to do the advertising equivalent of beating it into our heads for hours and hours.
 
Scotteq said:
For what?


So Lincoln can give his Gettysburg address, and then we can call take a nap for 2 hours so "his" time is equal to that of the speech given by Edward Everett?




Sorry: If there was any real substance to the vapid, partisan shit that passes for "Political Speech" nowadays there wouldn't be any need to do the advertising equivalent of beating it into our heads for hours and hours.
Click to expand...

Right...I see what you're saying. Plus with all the news sites, blogs and the like...there really isn't much need. I was just a bit miffed after I heard this crap.
 
If people were presented with all sides of an argument they would freeze. Their minds wouldn't be able to handle the data. This is why bigots and the rest of the programmed drones running around and running the world are important. They always do the right thing without having to think.
 
rudeguy said:
Right...I see what you're saying. Plus with all the news sites, blogs and the like...there really isn't much need. I was just a bit miffed after I heard this crap.
Click to expand...

There's a need if a network or other media is giving one candidate or party time that is not offered to the opposing side - that's equivalent to a donation far above what's allowed by law, and it's unreasonable to expect that the opposition be forced to purchase what his/their opponent receives for free. The President is unique though, and has responsibilities that are unique. If the President is giving an address that is part of his responsibilities, then the party out of power should not expect free air time to rebut; we don't have a President and an Anti-President, and I find it offensive when the opposing party rebuts the State of the Union. I think they should allow the State of the Union address to run unopposed and allow both parties to argue over what he REALLY said afterward. If however the President is clearly engaging in politics and is receiving free media bandwidth to do so - and close to an election every President will be engaging in politics - then the opposition deserves the same air time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top