Should Dems pick a new candidate?

[Ozoned]

Originally posted by: Stunt
Canada

That explains a lot, and how old are you?

 

[Stunt]

What do you mean explains a lot, you going to label me due to my age and nation of orientation...ok...let's see what you have to say.
I'm a 21 year old Canadian...what are your conclusions about my opinions/outlook.

 

[Ozoned]

Originally posted by: Stunt
What do you mean explains a lot, you going to label me due to my age and nation of orientation...ok...let's see what you have to say.
I'm a 21 year old Canadian...what are your conclusions about my opinions/outlook.

Oh, now I see, and what is your shoe size?

 

[Stunt]

11, you want my phone number too?...:S

 

[Ozoned]

Originally posted by: Stunt
11, you want my phone number too?...:S

No.

Hey guys, i'm not american but i feel that for the well being of the United States and the rest of the world that it is important to make sure Bush is ousted this election.

I just feel that when a liberal circle jerk is sponsored, we know a little about the pivot man.

'A 21 year old Canadian with a size 11 shoe and an attitude' thats enough.

 

[DoubleL]

If I look at the race with a open mind and try not to pick sides Kerry is in a lot of trouble, With the war going bad in peoples mind, The pictures, The news going after Bush like crazy, The Dems hitting Bush with everything they have and some they don't Bush still wins by most polls, Very close but wins, Now I know the Dems will keep going after Bush and the news will still go after Bush and some of the Dems I know it is working the other way around, Some are feeling sorry for Bush, Bad for Kerry and Kerry does nothing to help himself, Like I said it is a long time till the big race and I just have a feeling that is bad for Kerry to

 

[Stunt]

Actually if you look at what kerry is proposing, nothing is too extreme and even if it was it would never be passed with a house and senate run by republican majority. All I'm trying to address with this thread is that Bush has had a horrible international relations record (any good is from nations like ours that such up for a little bit of the US economic pie). If you look at the policies that bush intends to implement in his next term, you will see, with some moral sense that a passive government at this point is much better than bush with all the power in the world.
btw for the record, i am a conservative and did consider bush as a credible leader in the bush/gore election. His record speaks for itself, 50% of americans need to give their heads a shake, and we know which 50% that is.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Too late. The anti-Bush people and true red liberals will have to hold their nose and pull the kerry lever. They have tried too hard to push the idea that the party is united, inspite of the obvious lack of enthusiam, to turn back now. It would be devestating for them to switch horses after kerry "won" enough delegates.

I still get a chuckle out of the fact that the left is going to nominate the wrong guy It seems as though there is wave of "anyone but Bush" on the left but kerry didn't really provide the "anti-bush" -dean did. Too bad they are stuck with him....ZZZZzzzzzz....

CkG

 

[Stunt]

We can look at the bright side, after bush is re-elected, drives the coutry into the ground with massive deficits, a money pit called iraq and afganistan, the potential invasion of other "axis of evil" and huge fatalities through war; the democrats are garanteed to win.
It's the cycle of life. every 4-8 years, the public lets the republicans loose, and then it takes the dems 8 years to fix it, so that the public can thank them by voting them out.

 

[Ozoned]

Originally posted by: Stunt
Actually if you look at what kerry is proposing, nothing is too extreme and even if it was it would never be passed with a house and senate run by republican majority. All I'm trying to address with this thread is that Bush has had a horrible international relations record (any good is from nations like ours that such up for a little bit of the US economic pie). If you look at the policies that bush intends to implement in his next term, you will see, with some moral sense that a passive government at this point is much better than bush with all the power in the world.
btw for the record, i am a conservative and did consider bush as a credible leader in the bush/gore election. His record speaks for itself, 50% of americans need to give their heads a shake, and we know which 50% that is.

All I,m trying to address is that your Canadian opinion sucks. You bash Bush, I Bash you.. Thats how it works,ehhhh.

 

[Stunt]

ah...my opinion sucks, that's an intelligent comment, because your opinion is far more superior than mine, please Ozoned, please tell me what to believe, you seem sooo enlightened.
sorry for bashing your homie bush, he is a hero for freeing us from terrorists around the world, like the ones in iraq...oh wait!...9/11 has nothing to do with iraq, hrm, why were they invaded then?
please guide me!