• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Should Army Pfc. Bradley Manning Be Executed If Found Guilty Of Treason?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
Yeah, just forget the rule of law as long as it suits you. :rolleyes:

Bad laws should be broken and changed. Laws that allow preemptive wars and war profiteering and that cause American troops to needlessly die and tax dollars to be wasted are bad laws.
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
That's pure speculation and hyperbole.

http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/02/taliban-seeks-vengeance-in-wake-of-wikileaks.html

article said:
After WikiLeaks published a trove of U.S. intelligence documents—some of which listed the names and villages of Afghans who had been secretly cooperating with the American military—it didn’t take long for the Taliban to react. A spokesman for the group quickly threatened to “punish” any Afghan listed as having “collaborated” with the U.S. and the Kabul authorities against the growing Taliban insurgency. In recent days, the Taliban has demonstrated how seriously those threats should be considered. Late last week, just four days after the documents were published, death threats began arriving at the homes of key tribal elders in southern Afghanistan. And over the weekend one tribal elder, Khalifa Abdullah, who the Taliban believed had been in close contact with the Americans, was taken from his home in Monar village, in Kandahar province’s embattled Arghandab district, and executed by insurgent gunmen.
 

dfuze

Lifer
Feb 15, 2006
11,953
0
71
Execution? Not for this. But he certainly deserves jail time for releasing confidential information
 

bfdd

Lifer
Feb 3, 2007
13,312
1
0
Collaborators are killed everyday you cannot prove he was killed due to document #83445 being released.

did you read the article? they sent death threats to this guy and others over the documents then killed him. so even if the documents had nothing to do with this and they're just using it as an excuse to kill this guy, releasing the documents gave them the excuse needed to kill this guy. anyway you look at it you're wrong sorry please insert 25 cents to play again.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
A conservative's delusion. What major social change has ever occurred with people quietly following the law? Because I can think of plenty of others: Civil rights, prohobition, labour/union movements, suffrage, independence movements in many countries etc etc.

This man if guilty has already gotten people murdered. By your standards I should have carte blanche to murder abortion doctors because I'm "pursuing major social change." There's an enormous difference between refusing to go to the back of the bus, or peaceful protests, and releasing classified military secrets and getting killed the people who are trying to help us make Afghanistan a place that dos not support terrorists or mutilating women or burning homosexuals. While you are evidently very far gone on your America-hating and Taliban-loving, that does not justify not following military and civilian law.
 

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
I'm disappointed. I thought it was going to be about Credence.

Seriously though, Hope and Change. Democrats are nothing like Republicans. Really.

Meh. The only real difference is that the Democrats (lately) don't start wars. They just pick up and make worse the Republican quagmires. Either way, the Middle Class is getting fucked of existance.
 

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
This man if guilty has already gotten people murdered. By your standards I should have carte blanche to murder abortion doctors because I'm "pursuing major social change." There's an enormous difference between refusing to go to the back of the bus, or peaceful protests, and releasing classified military secrets and getting killed the people who are trying to help us make Afghanistan a place that dos not support terrorists or mutilating women or burning homosexuals. While you are evidently very far gone on your America-hating and Taliban-loving, that does not justify not following military and civilian law.

Manning didn't kill anyone. He simply exposed our efforts for what they really are and for that, he deserves our thanks. Afghanistan is a lost cause. The Soviets knew it and we're making the same blunders. The Afghani people will evolve as a society on their own time table and it could be never. Unless you're willing to continue to spend billions a week indefinitely, and I suspect you are, violence will increase tremendously and those people you're so worried about will die anyway. They'll probably die regardless of what we do - that's what happens in a country like that - you kill your enemies.

What in Afghanistan is worth my tax dollars? Why should my neighbor be risking his life?
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Meh. The only real difference is that the Democrats (lately) don't start wars. They just pick up and make worse the Republican quagmires. Either way, the Middle Class is getting fucked of existance.

Pretty much.
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
I agree completely, but while they are in force they should be followed. Otherwise we end up with the rule of men rather than the rule of law.

So you think the federal government should be vigorously enforcing anti-marijuana laws, even though everyone and his mother knows they're crap, and that the only reason they stay on the books is that Congress is too chicken-shit to actually legalize a drug everyone knows is much less harmful than alcohol and tobacco?
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
He and the Wikileaks guys should be in prison for the rest of their lives. They directly caused the deaths of people who took a great risk to help us save their country.

What reason could they possibly have to leak the villages and individuals collaborating with us? It defies all common sense and decency.
 
Last edited:

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
He and the Wikileaks guys should be in prison for the rest of their lives. They directly caused the deaths of people who took a great risk to help us save their country.

What reason could they possibly have to leak the villages and individuals collaborating with us? It defies all common sense and decency.

1) We haven't saved anything. Afghanistan is a loss.

2) I'm pretty sure people have been dying long before we were there, and will be dying long after we leave.

3) Cry more.
 

FuzzyBee

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2000
5,172
1
81
I guess there were Americans loyal to the Crown that thought Benedict Arnold was a hero, too.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
He and the Wikileaks guys should be in prison for the rest of their lives. They directly caused the deaths of people who took a great risk to help us save their country.

What reason could they possibly have to leak the villages and individuals collaborating with us? It defies all common sense and decency.

for a flaming liberal im actually shocked you feel that way.
 

ayabe

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2005
7,449
0
0
did you read the article? they sent death threats to this guy and others over the documents then killed him. so even if the documents had nothing to do with this and they're just using it as an excuse to kill this guy, releasing the documents gave them the excuse needed to kill this guy. anyway you look at it you're wrong sorry please insert 25 cents to play again.

I challenged a bogus assertion and surely every collaborator who gets their head chopped off from here on out will be blamed on this incident, that is just flawed sorry.
 

ayabe

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2005
7,449
0
0
He and the Wikileaks guys should be in prison for the rest of their lives. They directly caused the deaths of people who took a great risk to help us save their country.

What reason could they possibly have to leak the villages and individuals collaborating with us? It defies all common sense and decency.

It was a dump of hundreds of thousands of documents, no one including the Wikileaks guy has read it all and I'm fairly certain he can't be prosecuted.

Afghans don't give a flying fuck about Afghanistan, the only people on our side over there are people who've received a pallet full of US taxpayer cash dropped onto their front yard, or maybe their tribal leaders' yard, either way it's about the almighty dollar and tribal loyalties, no more, no less.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
I guess there were Americans loyal to the Crown that thought Benedict Arnold was a hero, too.

Actually, what there were were people who do the same thing most do today - people who ignored the real problem that happened for a simple story instead.

Benedict Arnold was a hell of a good general, and he was wrong by incompetent politicians over and over for crass political favoritism, if memory serves.

That's not saying his switch was tolerable by the US - a switch that seemed driven by his romance with a young British woman - but the thing to note is that the wrongs done by the leaders over him are ignored and forgotten, in favor of only looking at his wrong, with no lesson learned. That's too bad. Had our government done better, he'd have been a strong general for our side.

It's a little like the point I made in the Afghanistan thread, where our role just before the Soviet invasion is utterly ignore - there's no interest in it and any lessons on the war topic.

Even things like Custer and the Alamo tend to have similar myopia - that poor innocent unit was slaughtered by the Indians for no reason, the Alamo was attacked for no reason.

There's a whole lot of interest in 'remember the incident' and using it to justify war, but very little in the actual history of the Alamo as a place for Americans who mostly were defenders of slavery moving to Mexico and challenging the Mexican government, or Custer's unit's role in the massacre of Indians (until recent years at least, when a few pointed it out).

Benedict Arnold is America's most famous 'traitor', and the story has almost no blame for the 'real problem' that led to it.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
I challenged a bogus assertion and surely every collaborator who gets their head chopped off from here on out will be blamed on this incident, that is just flawed sorry.

If those people executed were identified in the leaked documents, yes, he should be blamed.

It was incredibly irresponsible not to have redacted out those peoples' names and villages prior to publication.

Fern