- Oct 30, 2000
- 42,589
- 5
- 0
The round should not have been chambered anyhow, CCW or not.
The round should not have been chambered anyhow, CCW or not.
ccw ftw
The round should not have been chambered anyhow, CCW or not.
Totally laws against this, how'd this happen?
The round should not have been chambered anyhow, CCW or not.
Bookbagger actually (bookbanger?).Most definitely a teabagger!!!
spidey, are you off your meds again?
ccw ftw
article repeatedly says "automatic handgun"
MSM gun fear mongering at its best.
I thought schools were gun free zones?
Yep, they are being very disengenious and misrepresenting. Go figure.
Yeah for the most part the only guys using revolvers are old cowboys or shooting enthusiasts and only then when they are at the range. I dont know anybody who actually carries a revolver except maybe a palm sized 38 in an ankle holster, for backup.I find it hilarious when the media about a handgun or even rifle ALWAYS has to point out "he used a semi-automatic handgun, he was able to purchase a semi-automatic handgun". Of course they always leave out the fact that most all guns are semi-automatic in an effort to push the agenda.
Anyone who carries without a round chambered might as well turn in their permits because all they have is a $400 paperweight. When properly carried it's not an issue. When improperly carried it's going to go badly anyway.
Shooter probably missed the sign. They should make them bigger, prefereably with neon lights.
