• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Shays (R) on Foley handling: At least no one died

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
It's amazing how many threads in P&N descend into a Clinton argument, especially when Clinton is totally irrelevant to the topic at hand. Even Fox News doesn't play that tired old card so often.
 
Originally posted by: Thump553
It's amazing how many threads in P&N descend into a Clinton argument, especially when Clinton is totally irrelevant to the topic at hand. Even Fox News doesn't play that tired old card so often.
Click to expand...

How is recent history irrelevent?

We have two Presidents, one commits nothing more than a private issue, is grilled mercilessly, and eventually caught lying. Another lies, but not under oath, misleads, and leads the country down the wrong path. The same guy also violates our laws and tramples our rights, yet there is not one investigation, no testimony, no grilling.

The double standard is astounding, yet people like you find no relevence. It's like saying that we shouldn't compare a theif to a murderer in considering whether they should be tried equally.
 
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Shays (R) on Foley handling: At least no one died
Click to expand...
Does he intend that to apply to Iraq and torturing "detainees," too? :shocked:
 
Originally posted by: hellokeith
Mr. Kennedy has criticized Speaker Hastert. Mr. Kennedy has no place criticizing anyone, considering his egregious past. Shays was simply pointing this out, and rightly so. AFAIK of him, Shays is not a republican I would vote for or support, but what he said is correct.
Click to expand...

Kennedy's past has nothing to do with the validity of his criticisms.
 
Originally posted by: blackllotus
Originally posted by: hellokeith
Mr. Kennedy has criticized Speaker Hastert. Mr. Kennedy has no place criticizing anyone, considering his egregious past. Shays was simply pointing this out, and rightly so. AFAIK of him, Shays is not a republican I would vote for or support, but what he said is correct.
Click to expand...

Kennedy's past has nothing to do with the validity of his criticisms.
Click to expand...

It does if you don't want to hear it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top