Share amd xp cpu, m/b overclock experience

fastvideo

Senior member
Aug 8, 2000
932
0
0
first, when i upgrade to xp cpu, and overclock them, yes they are stable and higher speed in benchmark, but i notice the boot up time is much longer (you can see it with the blue moving windowXp bar, 2 to 3 times more).

second, when i open some programs, eg CPU-Z, it take like 10 to 15 seconds to come up, it doesn't happened with my old althon cpus, they take like 3 seconds only.

i didn't notice these with my old althons overclocking.

test setup:
m/b: shuttle ak31 v3.1.
epox 8kha+
abit nf7s v2.0
cpu: althon tbird 1400
1700+xp thbed.
2500+xp bton

please share yours experience and tell me what is wrong with my xp overclocking.
 
Aug 16, 2001
22,505
4
81
Barton +2500 hits 3200 speeds with no problem (See rigs). It runs a bit hot since I have only one fan and it's not even running at full speed.
 

myocardia

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2003
9,291
30
91
Hey, if you want fast boot times, get an Intel chipset motherboard.:D Just kidding. It's because you're running WinXP on those newer ones, but not with the older ones, right? Because the higher I clock my cpu's, the faster they boot and the faster my programs open, but I'm still running 98SE.
 

11427

Senior member
May 9, 2003
412
0
71
Hmm,... I always thought it must be my imagination.
Glad to see others have experienced it also.
 

fastvideo

Senior member
Aug 8, 2000
932
0
0
if running xp cpu@default 133 speed, the boot up time is ok, but when it goes to 150 or higher then very slow.
even with the nforce nf7s v2.0 with 1700xp+ running @10X200, i am not happy with the boot up time and i try open cpu-z it takes quite a while to come up.
 

Clon22

Junior Member
Mar 9, 2004
14
0
0
Yes, I have the same experience. My boot up times were quite fast @ 166-177fsb. It got slower when I increased the fsb. I don't know why but it really doesn't matter to me as long at they don't take too long to boot. For now I like it at 222fsb.;)
 

BlackMountainCow

Diamond Member
May 28, 2003
5,759
0
0
Is it possible that Windows / CPU-Z read the stepping of the CPU, recognize a 2500+, then read the real MHz speed, recognize a 3200+ and that makes 'em waste some time? I have the same "problem" with CPU-Z on my 2500+@3200+. Starting CPU-Z takes quite a while in comparison to non OC. But my Windows is both times the same. I took my stop watch to be sure :D