- Jan 12, 2005
- 9,500
- 6
- 81
A researcher - Kathleen Richardson - claims that using robots for sex is unethical:
The simple counter-argument, of course, is that the entire relationship between humans and computers is and always has been "unequal." Computers are our "slaves" - owned by us to do our bidding. And when they are no longer able to do what we want them to do, or are too slow or too unreliable, we discard them.
So why should using robots for sex be considered something special?
I propose that extending relations of prostitution into machines is neither ethical, nor is it safe, the paper read. If anything the development of sex robots will further reinforce relations of power that do not recognise both parties as human subjects.
In a telephone interview with The Washington Post, Richardson with Erik Billing of the University of Skövde in Sweden, the co-creator of the Campaign Against Sex Robots said that she is not anti-sex. But she does object that the unequal power relationship thats part of sex work between humans may be replicated in robot-human encounters that will then be reinforced in human-human encounters, like a vicious circle.
Technology is not neutral, she said. Its informed by class, race and gender. Political power informs the development of technology. Thats why we can do something about it. These robots will contribute to more sexual exploitation.
The simple counter-argument, of course, is that the entire relationship between humans and computers is and always has been "unequal." Computers are our "slaves" - owned by us to do our bidding. And when they are no longer able to do what we want them to do, or are too slow or too unreliable, we discard them.
So why should using robots for sex be considered something special?