Sex offender PWNED

[TallBill]

I blame her parents more then I blame him. 15 is legal in some parts of the world, but *disgusting*, *sick*, and *perverted* in FL. She obviously wanted it.

Violating his probation was retarded, wonder what the first offense was.

 

[biggestmuff]

Originally posted by: eits

Originally posted by: compuwiz1

Originally posted by: eits
neat... some more anti-hispanic propaganda. i'm sure this stuff NEVER happens to blacks, whites, asians, etc.

How does this become anti-hispanic propaganda? He might not be Mexican or Spanish. Just because some dude with the last name of Gomez get's his name in the news, does not make it an anti-hispanic issue.

If so, the headline might have read: Hispanic sex offender arrested with 15 year old in his bed. :roll:

the last name is gomez and it's a fox news piece... put 2 and 2 together.

What!? Give us a break. You really are nucking futs.

 

[Nebor]

Wait a second, police are allowed to just "check in" on registered sex offenders?

That's pretty much a slap in the face to the constitution. Punishing someone beyond their prison term (ya know, where they repay their debt to society) is wrong.

 

[Toastedlightly]

she liked it.

 

[Jeff7]

He answered the door naked? No, there's absolutely nothing odd about a registered sex offender doing that.

 

[destrekor]

Originally posted by: Amused
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: eits
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: compuwiz1
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: eits
neat... some more anti-hispanic propaganda. i'm sure this stuff NEVER happens to blacks, whites, asians, etc.</end quote></div>

How does this become anti-hispanic propaganda? He might not be Mexican or Spanish. Just because some dude with the last name of Gomez get's his name in the news, does not make it an anti-hispanic issue.

If so, the headline might have read: Hispanic sex offender arrested with 15 year old in his bed. :roll:

</end quote></div>

the last name is gomez and it's a fox news piece... put 2 and 2 together.</end quote></div>

:roll:

Congrats. You have taken a much coveted spot next to dmcowen674 in the Complete Fscking Idiot box.

is it a lock box? 😀

 

[FallenHero]

Originally posted by: Nebor
Wait a second, police are allowed to just "check in" on registered sex offenders?

That's pretty much a slap in the face to the constitution. Punishing someone beyond their prison term (ya know, where they repay their debt to society) is wrong.

He was still repaying his debt to society by being on probation. People on probation and parole have less rights than the rest of us. Its still a punishment by the courts. Constitutionally speaking, there is no problem here.

 

[Nebor]

Originally posted by: FallenHero
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Nebor
Wait a second, police are allowed to just "check in" on registered sex offenders?

That's pretty much a slap in the face to the constitution. Punishing someone beyond their prison term (ya know, where they repay their debt to society) is wrong.</end quote></div>

He was still repaying his debt to society by being on probation. People on probation and parole have less rights than the rest of us. Its still a punishment by the courts. Constitutionally speaking, there is no problem here.

Umm... as far as I know, sex offender registration is for life. And that seems pretty wrong to be. Continuing punishment.

IMO every free man should have the same rights as the next. If you don't trust him with all his rights, you shouldn't let him out of prison.

 

[Triumph]

Originally posted by: Nebor
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: FallenHero
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Nebor
Wait a second, police are allowed to just "check in" on registered sex offenders?

That's pretty much a slap in the face to the constitution. Punishing someone beyond their prison term (ya know, where they repay their debt to society) is wrong.</end quote></div>

He was still repaying his debt to society by being on probation. People on probation and parole have less rights than the rest of us. Its still a punishment by the courts. Constitutionally speaking, there is no problem here.</end></div>

Umm... as far as I know, sex offender registration is for life. And that seems pretty wrong to be. Continuing punishment.

IMO every free man should have the same rights as the next. If you don't trust him with all his rights, you shouldn't let him out of prison.

What your saying is that inprisonment should be the ONLY form of punishment. And that just doesn't make any sense.

Now if he had gotten out of prison, and THEN the courts said, "Oh yeah, and we decided to tack on another 100 years of probation," then that would be wrong and would be considered double jeopardy. But nothing wrong here with lifelong probation for a sex offender.

 

[Nebor]

Originally posted by: Triumph
Now if he had gotten out of prison, and THEN the courts said, "Oh yeah, and we decided to tack on another 100 years of probation," then that would be wrong and would be considered double jeopardy. But nothing wrong here with lifelong probation for a sex offender.

Yes, I'm saying that every free man should be just as free as the next. Don't let them out of prison if you don't trust them to be party of society like everyone else. Lifelong probation is wrong on so many levels. That's a lifetime of persecution they're being put through.

Once someone has done their time, they should be free just like anyone else. Free to not be hassled by the police, free to get any job they want, free to purchase firearms, FREE.

 

[Triumph]

Well that's stupid.

 

[compuwiz1]

Originally posted by: Nebor
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Triumph
Now if he had gotten out of prison, and THEN the courts said, "Oh yeah, and we decided to tack on another 100 years of probation," then that would be wrong and would be considered double jeopardy. But nothing wrong here with lifelong probation for a sex offender.</end quote></div>

Yes, I'm saying that every free man should be just as free as the next. Don't let them out of prison if you don't trust them to be party of society like everyone else. Lifelong probation is wrong on so many levels. That's a lifetime of persecution they're being put through.

Once someone has done their time, they should be free just like anyone else. Free to not be hassled by the police, free to get any job they want, free to purchase firearms, FREE.

Your logic works quite well, until one of these whack jobs kills, rapes, and dismembers someone, maybe this time it will be one of your next of kin, or perhaps your own daughter or son. It's been proven over and over, through time, through generations......these people are not curable. Please do not sympathize with them. Their disease causes them to progress into more violent crimes as time goes on. This week he may only fondle. Next week, he gropes. Next week he rapes. Next week he kills. See the patern? :|

 

[invidia]

Criminals are like cancer and needs to be wiped off from the face of the planet.

 

[Whoozyerdaddy]

Originally posted by: Jeff7
He answered the door naked? No, there's absolutely nothing odd about a registered sex offender doing that.

*knock knock*

"Well hi there little Billy I've been wai... ummm... I mean, officer Jones. How are you today? I'm gonna go put some pants on. Don't worry, there's no naked teenager in the bedroom. Heh heh... Wanna play some X-Box?"

 

[Rogodin2]

Your logic works quite well, until one of these whack jobs kills, rapes, and dismembers someone, maybe this time it will be one of your next of kin, or perhaps your own daughter or son. It's been proven over and over, through time, through generations......these people are not curable. Please do not sympathize with them. Their disease causes them to progress into more violent crimes as time goes on. This week he may only fondle. Next week, he gropes. Next week he rapes. Next week he kills. See the patern?

compuwiz1, that the most amazing power of deduction I've yet seen on these forums!

You're a natural replacement for Albert 😉

Do you really believe what you typed?

Rogo

 

[BlancoNino]

Originally posted by: Nebor
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Triumph
Now if he had gotten out of prison, and THEN the courts said, "Oh yeah, and we decided to tack on another 100 years of probation," then that would be wrong and would be considered double jeopardy. But nothing wrong here with lifelong probation for a sex offender.</end quote></div>

Yes, I'm saying that every free man should be just as free as the next. Don't let them out of prison if you don't trust them to be party of society like everyone else. Lifelong probation is wrong on so many levels. That's a lifetime of persecution they're being put through.

Once someone has done their time, they should be free just like anyone else. Free to not be hassled by the police, free to get any job they want, free to purchase firearms, FREE.

I agree 100%. Probation is costly and is the main reason criminals keep going back to jail and flooding our prisons/jails.

 

[compuwiz1]

Originally posted by: Rogodin2
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Your logic works quite well, until one of these whack jobs kills, rapes, and dismembers someone, maybe this time it will be one of your next of kin, or perhaps your own daughter or son. It's been proven over and over, through time, through generations......these people are not curable. Please do not sympathize with them. Their disease causes them to progress into more violent crimes as time goes on. This week he may only fondle. Next week, he gropes. Next week he rapes. Next week he kills. See the patern? </end quote></div>

compuwiz1, that the most amazing power of deduction I've yet seen on these forums!

You're a natural replacement for Albert 😉

Do you really believe what you typed?

Rogo

Tired, so fuck off for now, I'll think about it and get back to you. 😛

 

[TallBill]

Originally posted by: compuwiz1

Your logic works quite well, until one of these whack jobs kills, rapes, and dismembers someone, maybe this time it will be one of your next of kin, or perhaps your own daughter or son. It's been proven over and over, through time, through generations......these people are not curable. Please do not sympathize with them. Their disease causes them to progress into more violent crimes as time goes on. This week he may only fondle. Next week, he gropes. Next week he rapes. Next week he kills. See the patern? :|

lol, you just argued Nebor's point. Probation aint gonna stop them, so if they really are still a danger to society why are the out and about? And if they are out and about, why bother with probation?

 

[Triumph]

Originally posted by: BlancoNino
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Nebor
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Triumph
Now if he had gotten out of prison, and THEN the courts said, "Oh yeah, and we decided to tack on another 100 years of probation," then that would be wrong and would be considered double jeopardy. But nothing wrong here with lifelong probation for a sex offender.</end quote></div>

Yes, I'm saying that every free man should be just as free as the next. Don't let them out of prison if you don't trust them to be party of society like everyone else. Lifelong probation is wrong on so many levels. That's a lifetime of persecution they're being put through.

Once someone has done their time, they should be free just like anyone else. Free to not be hassled by the police, free to get any job they want, free to purchase firearms, FREE.</end></div>

I agree 100%. Probation is costly and is the main reason criminals keep going back to jail and flooding our prisons/jails.

What you just said doesn't make any sense. If everyone who committed a crime got a life sentence, the jails would be MORE flooded than if everyone got probation, and some percentage of those went back to jail.

How does being on probation cause someone to go back to jail?

How is being on probation more costly than supporting someone with 3 meals a day, clothing, housing, facilities, showers, beds, 24/7 guard duty, etc.?

 

[Nebor]

Originally posted by: Triumph
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: BlancoNino
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Nebor
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Triumph
Now if he had gotten out of prison, and THEN the courts said, "Oh yeah, and we decided to tack on another 100 years of probation," then that would be wrong and would be considered double jeopardy. But nothing wrong here with lifelong probation for a sex offender.</end quote></div>

Yes, I'm saying that every free man should be just as free as the next. Don't let them out of prison if you don't trust them to be party of society like everyone else. Lifelong probation is wrong on so many levels. That's a lifetime of persecution they're being put through.

Once someone has done their time, they should be free just like anyone else. Free to not be hassled by the police, free to get any job they want, free to purchase firearms, FREE.</end></div>

I agree 100%. Probation is costly and is the main reason criminals keep going back to jail and flooding our prisons/jails.</end quote></div>

What you just said doesn't make any sense. If everyone who committed a crime got a life sentence, the jails would be MORE flooded than if everyone got probation, and some percentage of those went back to jail.

How does being on probation cause someone to go back to jail?

How is being on probation more costly than supporting someone with 3 meals a day, clothing, housing, facilities, showers, beds, 24/7 guard duty, etc.?

We're not saying give everyone a life sentence. We're saying if you're not willing to give them all their rights back, you shouldn't be letting them out of prison.

 

[Nebor]

Originally posted by: TallBill
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: compuwiz1

Your logic works quite well, until one of these whack jobs kills, rapes, and dismembers someone, maybe this time it will be one of your next of kin, or perhaps your own daughter or son. It's been proven over and over, through time, through generations......these people are not curable. Please do not sympathize with them. Their disease causes them to progress into more violent crimes as time goes on. This week he may only fondle. Next week, he gropes. Next week he rapes. Next week he kills. See the patern? :|

</end quote></div>

lol, you just argued Nebor's point. Probation aint gonna stop them, so if they really are still a danger to society why are the out and about? And if they are out and about, why bother with probation?

😀

 

[BlancoNino]

Originally posted by: Triumph

Originally posted by: BlancoNino
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Nebor
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: Triumph
Now if he had gotten out of prison, and THEN the courts said, "Oh yeah, and we decided to tack on another 100 years of probation," then that would be wrong and would be considered double jeopardy. But nothing wrong here with lifelong probation for a sex offender.</end quote></div>

Yes, I'm saying that every free man should be just as free as the next. Don't let them out of prison if you don't trust them to be party of society like everyone else. Lifelong probation is wrong on so many levels. That's a lifetime of persecution they're being put through.

Once someone has done their time, they should be free just like anyone else. Free to not be hassled by the police, free to get any job they want, free to purchase firearms, FREE.</end></div>

I agree 100%. Probation is costly and is the main reason criminals keep going back to jail and flooding our prisons/jails.

What you just said doesn't make any sense. If everyone who committed a crime got a life sentence, the jails would be MORE flooded than if everyone got probation, and some percentage of those went back to jail.

How does being on probation cause someone to go back to jail?

How is being on probation more costly than supporting someone with 3 meals a day, clothing, housing, facilities, showers, beds, 24/7 guard duty, etc.?

Because if somebody does a sentence for like 3 years for theft or something, they're hit with a "No drinking, no this, no that, random UA, etc" crap for like an extra year and take it from somebody who's mother worked at a jail for years...a very high percentage of hte guys in there are there because they did their sentence for their crime but then decided to get high or drink beer or drive a car. They keep going back because they have their freedoms taken away that they are used to having.