Ragic, This questions comes up every once in a while and the general consensus is that it does not help. I think it is mostly due to the fact that SETI only accesses the drive once every minute and Windows does a good job with disk caching.
Depends on your definition of "help" - I ran some fairly extensive tests a while back just for my own edification, and I determined that I could get a performance increase anywhere between 1 and 4 percent, depending on what the previous standard configuration had been.
In other words, the performance increase wasn't enough to justify implementing the solution.
Current client: 3.03 CLI
OS was Win98SE
Tried both a Microsoft solution and a 3rd party utility - I'd have to do a search to see if I can find the 3rd party program again.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.