SETI RamDrive question

JWMiddleton

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2000
5,686
172
106
Ragic, This questions comes up every once in a while and the general consensus is that it does not help. I think it is mostly due to the fact that SETI only accesses the drive once every minute and Windows does a good job with disk caching.
 

networkman

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
10,436
1
0
Depends on your definition of "help" - I ran some fairly extensive tests a while back just for my own edification, and I determined that I could get a performance increase anywhere between 1 and 4 percent, depending on what the previous standard configuration had been.

In other words, the performance increase wasn't enough to justify implementing the solution. :(
 

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,250
3,845
75
Been there, done that. When the CLi wrote to the disk once a second, it was worth it; but it doesn't seem to be now.

NWM, when did you run those tests? On the current client? What OS? It might be worth it to me.
 

networkman

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
10,436
1
0
Current client: 3.03 CLI
OS was Win98SE
Tried both a Microsoft solution and a 3rd party utility - I'd have to do a search to see if I can find the 3rd party program again.