SETI-Q Question (Updated - SETI Driver is causing it)

LANMAN

Platinum Member
Oct 10, 1999
2,901
134
106
Anyone notice SETI Q generates network traffic continuous? It isn't alot, but it never stops. Why?

--LANMAN
 

LANMAN

Platinum Member
Oct 10, 1999
2,901
134
106
I'll setup a sniffer tomorrow and see where things are going. :)

--LANMAN
 

MaxSiren

Senior member
Feb 19, 2001
355
0
0
It doesn't seem to create any traffic on my system when idle...

You sure it's SetiQ?
 

LANMAN

Platinum Member
Oct 10, 1999
2,901
134
106
Ah ha! I found it's actually SETI Driver doing it.

How about you all? Does yours?

--LANMAN
 

JWMiddleton

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2000
5,686
172
106
I shutdown my monitoring programs (FREEping and SetiPRO) and watched my 8-port Linksys switch that is daisy-chained with other switches to include 14 systems. There was little or no traffic for the few minutes I watched it. There will always be some low-level network traffic, but the only time SETI should be talking is when it is sending results and/or getting WUs.
 

Marrkks

Senior member
Jun 9, 2001
309
0
0
I have 3 machines running seti driver with setiQ on one of them. I don't have any traffic when they're not transmitting. seti driver ver. 1.6.3.3, two running ver 1.6.3.5.
 

LANMAN

Platinum Member
Oct 10, 1999
2,901
134
106
One thing I noticed, it doesn't happen all the time like I thought. (Until I started really paying attention to it) However, when I know I have nothing else running but SETI Driver, I'll shut it down and network traffic will cease. In one week I had only a RC5 proxy, SETIQ and SETI Driver going and it listed over 8Gig worth of data through the NIC. That's a little bit above normal that what I would think SETI Driver should transmit.
rolleye.gif


I'll leave just the RC5 Proxy, SETIQ and a command line SETI running this weekend and see what changes. :)

Stay tuned!

--LANMAN
 

Smoke

Distributed Computing Elite Member
Jan 3, 2001
12,650
207
106
I forgot who has been recommending it but I've been running SetiHide on one of my rigs for several weeks now and it is really smooth.

I wouldn't recommend one over the other but if you are having some issues with SetiDriver you could:

1. Delete it completely and start over with a new install of SetiDriver
2. Delete it completely and start over with a new install using SetiHide

The two programs do the same primary thing, cache WUs, but SetiHide does allow you to run it on a computer without any icon showing up in the startup tray (hence its name). I'm looking forward to the next version which is supposed to have the additional feature of installing it as a service for Win2000/XP.

I don't have a clue about your current problem but just wanted to give you a couple of alternative ideas. ;)