• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Seti Enhanced

January 4, 2006
Happy New Year! SETI@home Enhanced 5.0 is released (and will go to public if no problems show up). Still no graphics on Linux due to dynamic symbols not being properly exported. If any Linux hackers want to take a whack at it, please do.


i just got the new optimised client 5.0

i will inform you what is going on ...

Sir Ulli



 
for Info

The reason the most recent tape was split was around March 05 is not because we have a huge backlog of data - it's because we couldn't afford any more DLT tapes and stopped recording data around that time. Plus all our old DLT drives are broken - we have only one left up here at the lab that reasonably works - that's what I use to read these old data tapes.

I think I have about 50 tapes left in my pile to split. At the current "burn rate" this should last about a month.

However! We are releasing SETI enhanced, which should slow everything down, and this current set of data should last many more months - hopefully long enough to get the new data recorder down to Arecibo and get that all working.

And! Due to one reason or another we do have many tapes that were split and sent out but we have only about 10% scientific return - so we may throw those back into the pipeline if we otherwise run out of workunits to send out.

- Matt

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=26793#228431

btw my P4 3.2 with HT and Version 5.0

http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/results.php?userid=212

about 11:30 for two WUs not bad i think 🙂

Sir Ulli
 
Probably because the number of "flops" was the same ... I s this not the version which really calculates the number of floating point operations? Then the credits should be the same for identical WUs and the completion times should be different....Slower computer, longer time, less total credit (in a month or so...) Please correct me if I am wrong! :Q
 
Yes, the point of "flops-counting" is that different computers should still get the same claimed credit for same wu.

A quick look on this wu reveals total variation in claimed credits was 0.0042%. 😎

More generally the results from beta indicates ocassionally 1% variation in claimed credit, but more common seems to be less than 0.1% variation.
 
Originally posted by: SirUlli
January 31, 2006
We've released SETI@home Enhanced version 5.05. The results will probably differ from 5.02, so I've cancelled outstanding workunits and am updating credits. It'll probably take a few days for credits to catch up.

http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/

and more Info

http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/forum_thread.php?id=217#2159

Sir Ulli
Click to expand...

So ... is this a BETA ONLY release or is this a GOLD/PRODUCTION release to everyone?

Thanks

 
everyone can join the Fun

http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/

for Info

i just take my Hands on an optimised Client 5.05, which is at this time only for Inhouse testing

...

btw it is one from crunch3r................


if someone want to be a Beta Tester

a PM to me and, i will look, but

BETA, is Beta, no one can say that all credits here are going to Zero

that is Beta testink

for Info
Sir ulli

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top