Amazon does this all the time. They had all of their WP7 phones for a penny right after launch, Galaxy S too. They must get solid kickbacks from the carriers for the contracts.
Amazon does this all the time. They had all of their WP7 phones for a penny right after launch, Galaxy S too. They must get solid kickbacks from the carriers for the contracts.
Now the question I have: if I'm already on a family share plan, but my contract is up, can I grab a new discounted phone on Amazon and renew my contract that way? Without changing anything, simply re-upping as if I were in a Verizon store doing the same?
If they charge even 5 dollars more per month then its not worth it.
The problem is carriers arent honest about their prices. If I set up the plan I want right now they'll say it costs 70 dollars. But when the bill comes it will be closer to 85 with all their bullshit fees.
If its 90 cuz of Amazon, over two years it will be 120 more, which brings it back up to normal price.
Yeah being here in NOVA, you gotta go with the 4G Shorty. No reason to go with anything 3G. I'm wondering if there's a way I could get my family plan revamped through amazon so I could get this $99 phone. Could I just do a new 2 year contract through amazon w/out paying an ETF?
LTE aside, the Thunderbolt is 2009 phone, sold as a 2011 high end $$$ phone and that's why the price dropped.
Never mind that Thunderbolt's SoC (or any other) simply isn't capable of taking advantage of LTE speeds. Run browsing tests at 2, 3, 5 Mbps and you will see that the CPU bottleneck prevents faster site rendering, advantage of fast connection is negated by the SoC.
If you have deep pockets and can afford the tethering charge, Thunderbolt can be used as a hotspot but financially it isn't w
LTE aside, the Thunderbolt is 2009 phone, sold as a 2011 high end $$$ phone and that's why the price dropped.
Never mind that Thunderbolt's SoC (or any other) simply isn't capable of taking advantage of LTE speeds. Run browsing tests at 2, 3, 5 Mbps and you will see that the CPU bottleneck prevents faster site rendering, advantage of fast connection is negated by the SoC.
If you have deep pockets and can afford the tethering charge, Thunderbolt can be used as a hotspot but financially it isn't wisest path to choose.
Few problems with your statements. The SoC in the TB is a second generation Snapdragon/Adreno 205. Qualcomm didn't become sampling these until mid 2010. The first phones to use the 1st gen snapdragon were the Nexus One(Jan-2010) and Incredible(April-2010). Not exactly a 2009 phone when its silicon didn't get minted until mid-2010 and didn't launch in phones until early 2011. The TB isn't a top of the line phone, but its hardly a 2009 device.
Your second statement about the SoC being bottle necked with the LTE speeds was also proven false in the Galaxy S2 thread. Web browsing on 3G vs LTE is considerably faster and very noticeable. The only bottle necking that might occur would be in loading an 'intense' website, flash heavy, etc.,
I was going to post something similar, The TB is a very fast phone.
Tweaking a high performance phone is a bit of an art...
Am using this leaked radio: http://rootzwiki.com/showthread.php...r-Thunderbolt-versatile-for-GB-Leak-and-Froyo
And this rom: http://rootzwiki.com/showthread.php?176-Flyweight-Final-by-b16-and-birdman&p=1759
Add launcher pro or another launcher and it's even faster...
Wrong. Those were the first *Androids* to use Snapdragon.The first phones to use the 1st gen snapdragon were the Nexus One(Jan-2010) and Incredible(April-2010).
Wrong. Those were the first *Androids* to use Snapdragon.
HD2 = 2009. HTC had been coasting on that hardware platform between then and the Sensation.
