Originally posted by: RanDum72
Is it true that PS/2 mice has less CPU utilization compared to USB mice?
I wouldn't doubt it. Most USB ports still require an inordinant amount of CPU attention; plus, they usually share IRQs with the other USB ports and other onboard devices. Contrast that to PS/2 ports, which have their own dedicated IRQ (12), and a dedicated microcontroller (mini-CPU) to process the data.
An analogy could be made between a software-driven sound card, vs. one with an onboard audio-processor/DSP chip.
I've actually found that my Logitech OEMed Dell "Dove-bar" two-button PS/2 mouse, has higher resolution (800DPI?), than my 5-button Belkin optical scroll USB/PS/2 mouse (400DPI?).
Trying for a head shot in UT, and the mouse cursor jumps 3 pixels at once. Not good.
The back of the box mentions 800DPI, but I can't figure out how to adjust the DPI of a generic HID input device/HID mouse, in either Win2K or WinXP. Anyone know?