Sequester so catastrophic that the DOW hits record high.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
ADP Jobs Report this morning: http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?play=1&video=3000152486 (500,000 - 750,000 jobs lost or not created over 10 months because of sequester later this year)

Sequester: http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?play=1&video=3000152238



Ask the English about harsh austerity, especially when everyone else in the world would like to do the same thing at the same thing (triple dip recession).

We have 50 states right here that some had to go through extensive Austerity measures and we didn't have doom and gloom. Why must you continue to compare us with England? Also our debt vs gdp is over 100%, England's is not.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
If you want to stand my that sig and then call others morons than more power to ya.



Meaning the sequester is not bad news as far as the stock market is concerned. A little reading comprehension would serve you well.

1. Again, read lee at water and the GOP southern strategy.

2. HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHA, the effects of the sequester won't be felt for a while, are you that stupid? How could it be part of the economic data that came out?
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Whether you agree or not, journalists and politicians all over use the stock market to create whatever narrative they please.

Here is an article about how the stock market declined from fear over a full month prior to the original sequestration deadline:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/27/wall-street-stumbles-afte_n_2200617.html

I tried to find a direct clip or quote of Harry Reid prophesizing great declines in the stock market back in 2008 multiple times when the Senate would not initially pass some large spending or bailout package (articles from 5 years ago based off very generic search terms are difficult to find):
http://www.nationalreview.com/planet-gore/16536/harry-reid-bailout-vote/greg-pollowitz
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
Adding my sig back on, i think i meet the length guidelines now since i cut out all that other stuff. Matt, you're so stupid, i could explain to you till i'm blue in the face how my sig makes sense, but it doesn't matter because you have an iq of a turnip.

Scroll down to lee atwater you dummy and my sig makes total sense:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy

There's the stupid we know and love. And you could explain to you till your blue in the face how your sig makes sense, but nobody will understand it.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
Good god, this is so embarrassing for you Matt, you should throw in the towel.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
1. Again, read lee at water and the GOP southern strategy.

2. HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHA, the effects of the sequester won't be felt for a while, are you that stupid? How could it be part of the economic data that came out?

Because it is part of the current economic data. Or are you the only one who supposedly knows about it?
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,922
7,952
136
The DJIA is not a good indicator of how the overall economy is doing.

It's a good indicator of the billions per month the feds are printing... I mean loaning. The policy since last year has been non-stop open ended quantitative easing.

The bubble will inflate... and then hell will follow.
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,684
8,875
146
It's an interesting issue. What exactly does the DJIA mean today and in what ways does it serve as an indicator of the health of the nation's economy? What if it is an indicator of the health of foreign economies? What if it's an indicator of the health of the wealthy at the expense of the lower classes? Perhaps if some businesses were loss profitable but paid higher wages to more people the economy would be better but the DJIA would be lower?

The market is more of a future indicator. Think 8 months, a year into the future of where investors believe the economy will be.

Things like the sequester impact, credit downgrade etc... are priced into the market well in advance.

It would appear the sentiment is that investors believe the economy is showing strong, positive indicators for where it will in a years time.
 
Last edited:

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
What "CURRENT" economic data, you dummy?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324128504578344013987327702.html

Notice how they talk about jobs from LAST month, not since the sequester?

There's no economic data as it relates to the sequester, 'genius'.

Just stop, i'm seriously embarrassed for you.

The economic data Obama is using, the economic data that the sequester is going to “bring an economic catastrophe”. What part do you now understand? You can me embarrassed all you want for me, that doesn’t change the fact that the info regarding the sequester is out there and it doesn’t seem to be effecting the stock market.

Maybe you would understand if I used a different font?
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
The market is more of a future indicator. Think 8 months, a year into the future of where investors believe the economy will be.

Things like the sequester impact, credit downgrade etc... are priced into the market well in advance.

It would appear the sentiment is that investors believe the economy is showing strong, positive indicators for where it will in a years time.

Exactly.
 

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
The economic data Obama is using, the economic data that the sequester is going to “bring an economic catastrophe”.

I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with your OP claims, but the above is not data. Your arguments would have more credibility if you learned what data actually is.
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with your OP claims, but the above is not data. Your arguments would have more credibility if you learned what data actually is.

Obama isn't using data? When he goes out and claims X amount of jobs are going to be lost, that isn't data?
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Good questions. All this shows us is large Corps/Businesses and wealthy investors doing well. It is yet to be determined the impact to the middle class and lower class (economic) wise.

How about the fact that 401K's and Pensions are impacted by the growth of the Dow and Nasdaq. Where do you think they invest monies in these plans? Under their mattresses?
 

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
How about the fact that 401K's and Pensions are impacted by the growth of the Dow and Nasdaq. Where do you think they invest monies in these plans? Under their mattresses?

Come on, everyone knows that only the uber rich are invested in the stock market when it rises. It's when it falls that magicly it's 401K's and Pensions.
 

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
Obama isn't using data? When he goes out and claims X amount of jobs are going to be lost, that isn't data?

Data are records of things that have already happened, genius. Things that may happen on the future are not data, but nice work doubling down on the stupid.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
12,224
9,026
136
Data are records of things that have already happened, genius. Things that may happen on the future are not data, but nice work doubling down on the stupid.

I think it's actually a triple at this point, but who's counting?