Sentimental attachment to lenses?

fuzzybabybunny

Moderator<br>Digital & Video Cameras
Moderator
Jan 2, 2006
10,455
35
91
I just sold my Sigma 50-500mm. Man, we had some good times together.

When I was just starting out in DSLR photography, running around with my Rebel XT and Canon 50mm f/1.8 MKII, I stumbled upon someone's gallery of what I thought were the sharpest, most beautiful wildlife shots I had ever seen. I was blown away by the pictures, and saw that the lens was the Sigma 50-500mm. Being a telephoto nut, I was drooling over its reach and so impressed by how crisp the pictures were and how good of an eye the person who took them had.

Fast forward half a year and I had enough money to get the lens, used. I bought it on eBay of all places for $650. But here's the kicker... when I looked at the sample shots that were provided I quickly realized that they were the same beautiful wildlife shots that I had drooled over half a year ago! This was the same photographer selling LITERALLY the exact lens I had wanted.

Now the thing has given me lots of pictures I can be proud of, many days of enjoyment, and lots of blown away looks and comments by the average populous. And now it comes to an end. Sold on eBay for $575, quite the bargain for such a quality lens with an exciting history. It feels sad passing this sentimental thing down, and I can only hope that the next owner gets as much satisfaction from it as its two previous owners.

*sigh*

:(

Any stories of your's to tell?
 

996GT2

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2005
5,212
0
76
Lol...I don't keep my stuff long enough to get sentimentally attached. But I have basically gotten all the gear I have now for free. At least I can say that while most people lose money selling camera equipment, I MADE money doing it

Here's my camera history:

Canon Digital Rebel (300D) with 18-55 and 70-300 III USM:
Purchased for $190, sold for $400

Total profit to date:$210
----------
Canon Rebel XTi with 18-55 II (brand new in box, a guy already had a DSLR and got this as a gift, so I snapped it up on Craigslist. Definitely wasn't stolen since he showed me the gift receipt):

Purchased for $220, sold for $500

Total profit to date: $210-$220+$500=$490
----------
Nikon D70 with 50mm f/1.8D:
Purchased for $300

-Purchased new 18-55mm VR for D70: $120. Later sold for $135 (net profit $15)

Sold D70 body for $250, 50mm lens for $110

Total profit to date: $490-300+15+250+110=$565
----------
Nikon D200 with Sigma 24-60mm f/2.8 EX, Wireless remote set, and other accessories

Purchased for $690 ($455 body after 30% ebay cashback, $235 lens)
Sold for $975

Total profit to date: $565-690+975=$850
----------

CURRENT:
Canon EOS 40D, Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 EX, Canon 50mm f/1.8
Purchased ALL for $695 ($491 body after 25% ebay cashback, $149 lens after 25% cashback, $55 on Canon lens in package with 40D).

Total profit to date: $850-$695=$155 in pocket and all the FREE gear in my sig

The 40D is going to be a keeper though. Unless...I see some really really great deal for a 50D or D300 :D
 

996GT2

Diamond Member
Jun 23, 2005
5,212
0
76
Originally posted by: andylawcc
996GT2 = cold hearted bastard ;p

Hey, as long as I keep getting free equipment with a little extra cash in my pocket to boot, I'll accept that :p
 

Shimmishim

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2001
7,504
0
76
I don't think i can get rid of my 40D even though I just got a 1D Mark III. It's taken way too many quality pictures for me.

As for my lenses... I don't think I'll ever sell my 70-200 f/2.8IS. This thing stays on one of my bodies at all times!!!
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,078
136
In a roundabout sorta way.
My dad was much more into photography than me. He had a hundred dollar pentax 35mm and about 2000 bucks in lenses. Probably another 1000 in misc junk like flashes and pods.

He died when I was 23. In addition to straightening out the house and the hospital bills I also had to take care of personal effects. Ended up selling lots of nice stuff and lots of junk. Mostly because I needed the money but also because I had no place to keep all of his stuff.
I kept the jewlery box and his old switchblade and some pipestone.

Had to sell off the camera stuff for much less than it was worth.

So I guess you could so I had a sentimental attachment to some lenses, but not as much as I had to my dad.
 

soydios

Platinum Member
Mar 12, 2006
2,708
0
0
I have a sentimental attachment to my D50, yes. I took a lot of nice photos with that camera before I recently upgraded to a D90. I still have the D50 as a backup/secondary.
 

Deadtrees

Platinum Member
Dec 31, 2002
2,351
0
0
Just sold 24-70mm f/2.8 L. Had no feelings at all.
I may feel something when I let go of 5D that I've been using for 2 years.
Lenses come, lenses go, and I actually make money when I sell them.
Cameras, on the other hand, stay and stay and I lose great deal of money (not counting the value of pictures taken.)
 

randomlinh

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,846
2
0
linh.wordpress.com
Damn 996GT2, too much work, haha. And switching systems all the time? You don't find that a hassle? And skip the 50D, it's not worth it IMO. Just go for the D300, and then D700 =P The way canon is going, I almost want to do that. But my 20D/40D serve me well. No point to switch for switching's sake.
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
I rarely sell my cameras and lenses when I upgrade or change. I pass them on to two sons, two daughters-in-law, annow grandkids.

I always remember what my mentor told me back when I was seriously into horses. He said, "Never fall in love with your horse - it can keep you from getting a better one." It is possible that applies to cameras and lenses in some cases.

I still have my dad's Leica IIIC complete with manual. It was his pride and joy, and it got me started in photography - he game me his old Kodak 35. :)

III-C

It has an F2 Summitar lens - hot stuff back in 1948 when he bought it.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,354
8,444
126
Originally posted by: corkyg

I still have my dad's Leica IIIC complete with manual. It was his pride and joy, and it got me started in photography - he game me his old Kodak 35. :)

III-C

It has an F2 Summitar lens - hot stuff back in 1948 when he bought it.

my offer of $10 still stands
 

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,767
32
81
Nah, I've had no trouble selling my Tamron 28-75, Sigma 30, Canon 17-85, and Canon 24-105.

They were all sold for better equipment.

 

Koing

Elite Member <br> Super Moderator<br> Health and F
Oct 11, 2000
16,843
2
0
I want a D700 with video :p

Koing
 

scott916

Platinum Member
Mar 2, 2005
2,906
0
71
I used to be like that with my car audio equipment. I almost cried when I sold my Eclipse Ti 15. Wwwah. So FBB, are you glad you switched to Nikon?