Senator Leland Yee trying to ban more CA guns

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
Playing devil's advocate, you could interpret that as "the people" not "each individual person." Kind of like "the people of this country have a right to create taxes on themselves" but you can't go tax your neighbor. It's the collective that has the right, in this case enacted through well-ordered militias, not necessarily every citizen period.

Would you argue that the word "people" means the same thing in the following text:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures"
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
> But the way it reads to me is we only need guns in armories and only for the local militia and only if somebody invades us.

To me "keep and bear arms" doesn't imply having them locked up away from the citizen militia, but this might be a debate for another thread.

Why would it read like that when the guys who wrote it just finished a war with the country that ruled them? If that "law" was in effect and properly enforced the people who wrote that amendment likely wouldn't have been able to defeat England because they would have been very short on arms.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Provided they ran drills once in a while, the citizenry could access them quickly in event of Chinese invasion or whatever.

The founding fathers were as concerned for freedom from despotic rule in their own country as from foreign invaders. Protections for speech and against search and seizure had nothing to do with the Chinese.

Having the government keep all arms locked up puts us at the mercy of that government.
 

Pneumothorax

Golden Member
Nov 4, 2002
1,181
23
81
Supposing this law never passes, how much is a legal AR15 going for in CA these days? Need some riot protection when the welfare checks bounce.
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,967
140
106
..and with the same breath let more murdering MS-13 gangsters into "sanctuary" cities in Calif.
 

runzwithsizorz

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2002
3,497
14
76
Playing devil's advocate, you could interpret that as "the people" not "each individual person." Kind of like "the people of this country have a right to create taxes on themselves" but you can't go tax your neighbor. It's the collective that has the right, in this case enacted through well-ordered militias, not necessarily every citizen period. 07-21-2012 07:59 PM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Would you argue that the word "people" means the same thing in the following text:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, confiscating just half of all weapons, searching just a few of the cars driving through a check point, frisking just a few of the people walking down the street, kicking down the doors of just a couple of houses on the the block, and wire tapping just a few phones makes it OK? Hmmmm,
Seems the, *devils advocate*, has the ear of our leaders
 

runzwithsizorz

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2002
3,497
14
76
This will never happen. These debates kick up after any shooting, and promptly disappear after a week. Thankfully we have a quick news cycle.
Ah, my friend, here you are wrong. For it has already happened, and will continue, 1 law, 1 ban, 1 ordinance, 1 code, 1 Czar, 1 panel, 1 new bureau, 1 more power, and one executive order at a time, and all begins with a,"debate". Started years ago where it was easy, (San Fransisco, etc), expanded to an easy State, (Cal./NY, etc). The march to disarm, dumb-down, re-train, distract, brainwash, control, incarcerate, confuse, demoralize, dechristianize, enslave, misinform, and exterminate was started long ago. Does not matter who is in charge, the president, cabinet, administration, house, senate, or supreme courts, THE goal(s), and the march continues. Have you not been paying attention these last 2 decades? Have you ever thought that just maybe, the job/goal of say;
Chris Mathews, and Rush Limbaugh and their networks is actually one, and the same? They're evil, No no, they're evil, lol, meanwhile back on topic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlhIW8X5cRU&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LQZI9COOU4&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH_TR6fRic8&feature=relmfu
How the march was conducted in my State; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1Vhqd7RlKs&feature=related