Originally posted by: LegendKiller
2b. Two democrats guilty of accepting paltry gifts.
$100,000 is a paltry gift?
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
2b. Two democrats guilty of accepting paltry gifts.
true!Originally posted by: OrByte
Both sides do take money/things
and no it is not OK.
If he got busted he should be kicked to the curb.
More and more of these stories keep coming out and it amazes me that these crooks help run this country.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Meuge
Oh for ******'s sake. I'd much rather my leaders took free boxing tickets, rather than take away my freedoms and get thousands of people killed.
Usually one of the steps in taking your freedoms away. Once they are corruptable anything is possible.
I think it's naive to expect politicians to remain uncorruptible. It never happened in history, and is unlikely to come about.
We must operate with an assuption that to a degree every leader is corruptible. Therefore, as far as corrupting events go, I'll buy them tickets myself, rather than continue seeing the utter shame that our government has become now.
That may be true but to condone it as part of the job is the source of the problem imo.
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
The part I love- "several ethics experts said..."
Which experts are these? The ones who work for the NRO, Heritage Foundation, Independence institute, AEI, or any number of other rightwing think tanks?
The part none of the critics want to mention is that Reid's efforts and votes have always followed the interests of his own state wrt regulating their big money making enterprises, or that it's not like laundering money thru various non-profits to get very high dollar golfing junkets in Scotland... or thru the RNC to get illegal money back to local Texas candidates...
Gotta divert attention from the Abramoff scandal, and the obvious foot-dragging from the DOJ in that regard- Quick, Look over there! Harry Reid went to a Boxing Match, for free! With tickets from a Nevada State Agency! Oh, the Horror!
Shows how desperate they've become, and how picayune their issues really are wrt to Reid...
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Meuge
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: Meuge
Oh for ******'s sake. I'd much rather my leaders took free boxing tickets, rather than take away my freedoms and get thousands of people killed.
Usually one of the steps in taking your freedoms away. Once they are corruptable anything is possible.
I think it's naive to expect politicians to remain uncorruptible. It never happened in history, and is unlikely to come about.
We must operate with an assuption that to a degree every leader is corruptible. Therefore, as far as corrupting events go, I'll buy them tickets myself, rather than continue seeing the utter shame that our government has become now.
That may be true but to condone it as part of the job is the source of the problem imo.
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
The part I love- "several ethics experts said..."
Which experts are these? The ones who work for the NRO, Heritage Foundation, Independence institute, AEI, or any number of other rightwing think tanks?
The part none of the critics want to mention is that Reid's efforts and votes have always followed the interests of his own state wrt regulating their big money making enterprises, or that it's not like laundering money thru various non-profits to get very high dollar golfing junkets in Scotland... or thru the RNC to get illegal money back to local Texas candidates...
Gotta divert attention from the Abramoff scandal, and the obvious foot-dragging from the DOJ in that regard- Quick, Look over there! Harry Reid went to a Boxing Match, for free! With tickets from a Nevada State Agency! Oh, the Horror!
Shows how desperate they've become, and how picayune their issues really are wrt to Reid...
I just plane disagree with this sh!t. There is no reason politicians have to be corrupt or take bribes and there is no excusing any of this in any way. Reid should be out on his ass or doing time, in my opinion. Congress should accept nothing at all for free. Absolutely nothing at all, period. Accepting gifts should be put up there with treason with the penalty being shot on in public.
Clearly the average ethical evolution of the average American and his average politician is on a par and that's why this crap is tolerated. I say they should be shot for violating the public trust which should be sacred. You don't sh!t on God and you don't f#ck the people. Get yourselves some f#cking morals.
You are either unfamiliar with the basic tenets of human nature, or have never lived outside of the U.S.Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Clearly the average ethical evolution of the average American and his average politician is on a par and that's why this crap is tolerated. I say they should be shot for violating the public trust which should be sacred. You don't sh!t on God and you don't f#ck the people. Get yourselves some f#cking morals.
Originally posted by: wetech
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
2b. Two democrats guilty of accepting paltry gifts.
$100,000 is a paltry gift?
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Several ethics experts said Reid should have paid for the tickets, which were close to the ring and worth between several hundred and several thousand dollars each, to avoid the appearance he was being influenced by gifts.
Other senators take different approach
Two senators who joined Reid for fights with the complimentary tickets took markedly differently steps.
Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, insisted on paying $1,400 for his ticket when he joined Reid for a 2004 championship fight. Sen. John Ensign, R-Nevada, accepted free tickets to another fight with Reid but had abstained from taking any votes or actions on the boxing bill because his father was an executive for a Las Vegas hotel that hosts fights.
"I'm not goody-two-shoes. I just feel these events are nothing I did wrong," Reid said.
MSNBC.com
So where's the line exactly? And did Reid cross it and if so, why?
US Senate Code of Conduct:
$49.99 maximum per gift, $99.99 maximum per year from each source (count gifts of $10 or more).
Gift means ANYTHING of monetary value: e.g., meals, entertainment, travel, lodging, tickets.
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
The part I love- "several ethics experts said..."
Originally posted by: TGS
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Several ethics experts said Reid should have paid for the tickets, which were close to the ring and worth between several hundred and several thousand dollars each, to avoid the appearance he was being influenced by gifts.
Other senators take different approach
Two senators who joined Reid for fights with the complimentary tickets took markedly differently steps.
Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, insisted on paying $1,400 for his ticket when he joined Reid for a 2004 championship fight. Sen. John Ensign, R-Nevada, accepted free tickets to another fight with Reid but had abstained from taking any votes or actions on the boxing bill because his father was an executive for a Las Vegas hotel that hosts fights.
"I'm not goody-two-shoes. I just feel these events are nothing I did wrong," Reid said.
MSNBC.com
So where's the line exactly? And did Reid cross it and if so, why?
He crossed the line when he took a gift worth more than $49.99. Anyone who disagrees with that needs to take their head out of the sand.
US Senate Code of Conduct:
$49.99 maximum per gift, $99.99 maximum per year from each source (count gifts of $10 or more).
Gift means ANYTHING of monetary value: e.g., meals, entertainment, travel, lodging, tickets.
The sad part is, we all know that nothing will come of this.
edit:
Originally posted by: Jhhnn
The part I love- "several ethics experts said..."
Yes, perhaps those experts are people who actually read the ethics rules. I know politicians don't have time to read every piece of paper that comes across their desks...
Originally posted by: moshquerade
true!Originally posted by: OrByte
Both sides do take money/things
and no it is not OK.
If he got busted he should be kicked to the curb.
More and more of these stories keep coming out and it amazes me that these crooks help run this country.
it would please me immensely if Reid took a fall for this off his pompous pedestal.
Originally posted by: Aisengard
Reid appeases to those with sticks up their asses.
There. Now, if you want to call him all corrupt and whatnot, whatever, just know that you were all lambasting a man who took free boxing tickets, and comparing him to high-criminals Cheney and Abramoff, who have done so much more to hurt this country than boxing tickets could ever do.
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Aisengard
Reid appeases to those with sticks up their asses.
There. Now, if you want to call him all corrupt and whatnot, whatever, just know that you were all lambasting a man who took free boxing tickets, and comparing him to high-criminals Cheney and Abramoff, who have done so much more to hurt this country than boxing tickets could ever do.
All of a sudden, under scrutiny, the asshole gets a spine and says he won't take bribes any more. What a slimy piece of crap. Everybody knows that it's all about appearances and that's not supposed to mean appearances that show up when somebody turns a spotlight into your filthy little worm hole.
Originally posted by: Aisengard
I can pretty much guarantee no one is even going to remember about this past next month. Sorry, but this is such small fries compared to any of the other scandals going on these days.
Besides, the only people he "extorted" was the Nevada Bureau of Boxing, or whatever it was called. Article said that since he's the guy from Nevada, it was a gift from the state. I guess it wasn't, but this is pretty much in no way comparable to the Cheneys and Delays and Jeffersons of this world. Face it, people got their panties in a twist over this one because they wanted the spotlight off of the real problems. Since there was pretty much nothing wrong, it didn't work.
Originally posted by: Aisengard
Face it, people got their panties in a twist over this one because they wanted the spotlight off of the real problems. Since there was pretty much nothing wrong, it didn't work.