• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Seems like someone has had a problem handling classified documents

Brainonska511

Brainonska511

Lifer
A secret U.S. military investigation in 2010 determined that Michael T. Flynn, the retired Army general tapped to serve as national security adviser in the Trump White House, “inappropriately shared” classified information with foreign military officers in Afghanistan, newly released documents show.

Although Flynn lacked authorization to share the classified material, he was not disciplined or reprimanded after the investigation concluded that he did not act “knowingly” and that “there was no actual or potential damage to national security as a result,” according to Army records obtained by The Washington Post under the Freedom of Information Act.
Click to expand...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...nn-705a:homepage/story&utm_term=.f79863b17fd2

Guess people didn't really care about inappropriately handled classified information after all.
 
Its one of their people so they won't care. Remember, no such thing as intellectual honesty amongst righties.
 
The story demonstrates the consistency of the application of law under the Obama administration more than anything. Flynn screwed up in the handling of classified info, Clinton screwed up in the handling of classified info, neither got hanged.
 
John Connor said:
Don't try and defend the Washington compost. You will fail more than Hillary winning an election. LOL
Click to expand...
I'm not defending anything. I'm just pointing out the utter hypocrisy. Y'all were so shrill over Clinton and her e-mails for the last few years, but not a peep about Flynn.
 
fskimospy said:
The FBI also concluded that Clinton did not knowingly transmit classified information and we saw the conservative reaction to that, haha.
Click to expand...


That's a ruse, and you know it. She knew full well why that server was created. It forms a bridge between that old Latin phrase: quid pro quo.
 
Brainonska511 said:
I'm not defending anything. I'm just pointing out the utter hypocrisy. Y'all were so shrill over Clinton and her e-mails for the last few years, but not a peep about Flynn.
Click to expand...


Do you honestly think that Flynn would knowingly give classified information to some half-ass dimwitted A-rab Afganys?

I don't think so.
 
John Connor said:
Do you honestly think that Flynn would knowingly give classified information to some half-ass dimwitted A-rab Afganys?

I don't think so.
Click to expand...
Sounds like you're making excuses for him and his improper handling of classified information, something that was integral to his job at the time.
 
John Connor said:
Do you honestly think that Flynn would knowingly give classified information to some half-ass dimwitted A-rab Afganys?

I don't think so.
Click to expand...

Arabs?! Arabs?!

d7118037f70b2a1cb97ca69afaa4164f.jpg
 
John Connor said:
Once again.




Sounds like you are trying to toss him under the buss for no fault of his own.
Click to expand...
Yeah - so he was ignorant about it. That's so much better when it was part of his job to know. Why do you keep covering for Flynn? Do you get a prize for each unique excuse you can come up with?
 
John Connor said:
Is ignorance now malice?
Click to expand...
Who cares about intent? I've heard it was only about what happened - he was found to be ignorant of a key responsibility of his job and now is going to be put back in a position where he can once again "accidentally" mishandle classified material. Where's the outrage and excoriation? You were so gungho when it was your political enemy...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top