Seems Iran tried (and failed) to kidnap US soldiers

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: dahunan
Iran is a terrorist state

Look at what the Shiits in Iraq are doing with Irans SUPPORT

Look at the dumb ****** Hamas does with IRans SUPPORT

Why doesn't Iran actually help with educating the people of Palestine instead of using them as pawns in their religious war with Israel

I also don't believe one word these soldiers are being forced to say on TV.. It is also ILLEGAL to parade them around like TERRORISTS WOULD

They kidnapped these soldiers to USE -- the same way terrorists would.. Can you deny that?

oh please

U.S gave chemical weapons to Iraq to use on Iranians who were defending their country from an Arab invasion. Iraq used those chemical weapons and it eventually killed hundreds of thousands of people

Fast forward years later and the U.S invaded Iraq because of those very chemical weapons

The actions of the U.S have resulted in millions of people dead.

so Iran gives weapons to certain groups. Big deal. China and Russia do the same exact thing. Neither Iran or China or Russia are handing around chemical weapons.

It is the U.S who has done so.
So the U.S has ZERO right to call Iran a terrorist state.

I change my wording.. U.S is a terrorist/dangerous state when Republicans are in power.

Would you get off it already? You can spout the anti-American garbage all day long, it doesn't mean it's true. Look up the modern definition of terrorism, and explain to me how the US giving Iraq chemical weapons falls into that definition. Hell, the way Iran is behaving lately, I wish Iraq would've used more of it. Iran is our enemy, plain and simple.

So Iran is a terrorist state by giving Hezbollah weapons &

the U.S is NOT a terrorist state by giving a terrorist state chemical weapons?

What is your level of education ntdz? Seriously.

Iran acting lately? U.S invaded a country. Iran took 15 British soldiers hostage. Yeah Iran is much worse than the U.S again.

Iraq did not use the chemical weapons to terrorize anyone, they used them to win a war. Hezbollah is an organization built on terrorism. Iran took 15 BRITISH soldiers hostage, on a mission in Iraqi waters with a mandate from both Iraq and the UN...I don't think any other country would have the audacity to do such a thing. Now I read about some incident where Iran thought they were going to kidnap some American soldiers...are they are out of their mind? They would have the wrath of god brought upon them if they touched one of our soldiers.

win what war?
Saddam's goal was to murder every Persian on the planet.

Why the hell do you think Saddam invaded Iran?

Do you know anything about the things you post?

Iraq was listed as a terrorist state by the U.S. They then give this state chemical weapons.

You are saying Hezbollah is a bigger threat than Saddam's Iraq? YOU ARE CLUELESS.

You are living in a fantasy world. Must be nice. Hot women there?

 

[ntdz]

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: dahunan
Iran is a terrorist state

Look at what the Shiits in Iraq are doing with Irans SUPPORT

Look at the dumb ****** Hamas does with IRans SUPPORT

Why doesn't Iran actually help with educating the people of Palestine instead of using them as pawns in their religious war with Israel

I also don't believe one word these soldiers are being forced to say on TV.. It is also ILLEGAL to parade them around like TERRORISTS WOULD

They kidnapped these soldiers to USE -- the same way terrorists would.. Can you deny that?

oh please

U.S gave chemical weapons to Iraq to use on Iranians who were defending their country from an Arab invasion. Iraq used those chemical weapons and it eventually killed hundreds of thousands of people

Fast forward years later and the U.S invaded Iraq because of those very chemical weapons

The actions of the U.S have resulted in millions of people dead.

so Iran gives weapons to certain groups. Big deal. China and Russia do the same exact thing. Neither Iran or China or Russia are handing around chemical weapons.

It is the U.S who has done so.
So the U.S has ZERO right to call Iran a terrorist state.

I change my wording.. U.S is a terrorist/dangerous state when Republicans are in power.

Would you get off it already? You can spout the anti-American garbage all day long, it doesn't mean it's true. Look up the modern definition of terrorism, and explain to me how the US giving Iraq chemical weapons falls into that definition. Hell, the way Iran is behaving lately, I wish Iraq would've used more of it. Iran is our enemy, plain and simple.

So Iran is a terrorist state by giving Hezbollah weapons &

the U.S is NOT a terrorist state by giving a terrorist state chemical weapons?

What is your level of education ntdz? Seriously.

Iran acting lately? U.S invaded a country. Iran took 15 British soldiers hostage. Yeah Iran is much worse than the U.S again.

Iraq did not use the chemical weapons to terrorize anyone, they used them to win a war. Hezbollah is an organization built on terrorism. Iran took 15 BRITISH soldiers hostage, on a mission in Iraqi waters with a mandate from both Iraq and the UN...I don't think any other country would have the audacity to do such a thing. Now I read about some incident where Iran thought they were going to kidnap some American soldiers...are they are out of their mind? They would have the wrath of god brought upon them if they touched one of our soldiers.

win what war?
Saddam's goal was to murder every Persian on the planet.

Why the hell do you think Saddam invaded Iran?

Do you know anything about the things you post?

Iraq was listed as a terrorist state by the U.S. They then give this state chemical weapons.

You are saying Hezbollah is a bigger threat than Saddam's Iraq? YOU ARE CLUELESS.

You are living in a fantasy world. Must be nice. Hot women there?

Since you obviously believe Saddam was a big threat and Iraq a terrorist state, you must be for the war in Iraq then, right?

I can promise you right now that Saddam didn't invade Iran to murder every Persian on the planet, just like he didn't invade Kuwait to every ever Kuwait citizen.

On a side note, who would you want to win a war between the US and Iran?

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: dahunan
Iran is a terrorist state

Look at what the Shiits in Iraq are doing with Irans SUPPORT

Look at the dumb ****** Hamas does with IRans SUPPORT

Why doesn't Iran actually help with educating the people of Palestine instead of using them as pawns in their religious war with Israel

I also don't believe one word these soldiers are being forced to say on TV.. It is also ILLEGAL to parade them around like TERRORISTS WOULD

They kidnapped these soldiers to USE -- the same way terrorists would.. Can you deny that?

oh please

U.S gave chemical weapons to Iraq to use on Iranians who were defending their country from an Arab invasion. Iraq used those chemical weapons and it eventually killed hundreds of thousands of people

Fast forward years later and the U.S invaded Iraq because of those very chemical weapons

The actions of the U.S have resulted in millions of people dead.

so Iran gives weapons to certain groups. Big deal. China and Russia do the same exact thing. Neither Iran or China or Russia are handing around chemical weapons.

It is the U.S who has done so.
So the U.S has ZERO right to call Iran a terrorist state.

I change my wording.. U.S is a terrorist/dangerous state when Republicans are in power.

Would you get off it already? You can spout the anti-American garbage all day long, it doesn't mean it's true. Look up the modern definition of terrorism, and explain to me how the US giving Iraq chemical weapons falls into that definition. Hell, the way Iran is behaving lately, I wish Iraq would've used more of it. Iran is our enemy, plain and simple.

So Iran is a terrorist state by giving Hezbollah weapons &

the U.S is NOT a terrorist state by giving a terrorist state chemical weapons?

What is your level of education ntdz? Seriously.

Iran acting lately? U.S invaded a country. Iran took 15 British soldiers hostage. Yeah Iran is much worse than the U.S again.

Iraq did not use the chemical weapons to terrorize anyone, they used them to win a war. Hezbollah is an organization built on terrorism. Iran took 15 BRITISH soldiers hostage, on a mission in Iraqi waters with a mandate from both Iraq and the UN...I don't think any other country would have the audacity to do such a thing. Now I read about some incident where Iran thought they were going to kidnap some American soldiers...are they are out of their mind? They would have the wrath of god brought upon them if they touched one of our soldiers.

win what war?
Saddam's goal was to murder every Persian on the planet.

Why the hell do you think Saddam invaded Iran?

Do you know anything about the things you post?

Iraq was listed as a terrorist state by the U.S. They then give this state chemical weapons.

You are saying Hezbollah is a bigger threat than Saddam's Iraq? YOU ARE CLUELESS.

You are living in a fantasy world. Must be nice. Hot women there?

Since you obviously believe Saddam was a big threat and Iraq a terrorist state, you must be for the war in Iraq then, right?

I can promise you right now that Saddam didn't invade Iran to murder every Persian on the planet, just like he didn't invade Kuwait to every ever Kuwait citizen.

uhm.. Iraq was on the list of terrorist states because it supported groups against Israel

Iran is on that list for the very same reasons.

Both are identical. Israel is what they have (had now) in common.

U.S gave weapons to a terrorist state that was conducting an illegal war to exterminate a population.

Saddam's last words were that he hates every Persian on the planet
Chemical weapons are illegal weapons. You are not allowed to use chemical weapons during war

 

[Narmer]

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: dahunan
Iran is a terrorist state

Look at what the Shiits in Iraq are doing with Irans SUPPORT

Look at the dumb ****** Hamas does with IRans SUPPORT

Why doesn't Iran actually help with educating the people of Palestine instead of using them as pawns in their religious war with Israel

I also don't believe one word these soldiers are being forced to say on TV.. It is also ILLEGAL to parade them around like TERRORISTS WOULD

They kidnapped these soldiers to USE -- the same way terrorists would.. Can you deny that?

oh please

U.S gave chemical weapons to Iraq to use on Iranians who were defending their country from an Arab invasion. Iraq used those chemical weapons and it eventually killed hundreds of thousands of people

Fast forward years later and the U.S invaded Iraq because of those very chemical weapons

The actions of the U.S have resulted in millions of people dead.

so Iran gives weapons to certain groups. Big deal. China and Russia do the same exact thing. Neither Iran or China or Russia are handing around chemical weapons.

It is the U.S who has done so.
So the U.S has ZERO right to call Iran a terrorist state.

I change my wording.. U.S is a terrorist/dangerous state when Republicans are in power.

Would you get off it already? You can spout the anti-American garbage all day long, it doesn't mean it's true. Look up the modern definition of terrorism, and explain to me how the US giving Iraq chemical weapons falls into that definition. Hell, the way Iran is behaving lately, I wish Iraq would've used more of it. Iran is our enemy, plain and simple.

So Iran is a terrorist state by giving Hezbollah weapons &

the U.S is NOT a terrorist state by giving a terrorist state chemical weapons?

What is your level of education ntdz? Seriously.

Iran acting lately? U.S invaded a country. Iran took 15 British soldiers hostage. Yeah Iran is much worse than the U.S again.

Iraq did not use the chemical weapons to terrorize anyone, they used them to win a war. Hezbollah is an organization built on terrorism. Iran took 15 BRITISH soldiers hostage, on a mission in Iraqi waters with a mandate from both Iraq and the UN...I don't think any other country would have the audacity to do such a thing. Now I read about some incident where Iran thought they were going to kidnap some American soldiers...are they are out of their mind? They would have the wrath of god brought upon them if they touched one of our soldiers.

win what war?
Saddam's goal was to murder every Persian on the planet.

Why the hell do you think Saddam invaded Iran?

Do you know anything about the things you post?

Iraq was listed as a terrorist state by the U.S. They then give this state chemical weapons.

You are saying Hezbollah is a bigger threat than Saddam's Iraq? YOU ARE CLUELESS.

You are living in a fantasy world. Must be nice. Hot women there?

Since you obviously believe Saddam was a big threat and Iraq a terrorist state, you must be for the war in Iraq then, right?

I can promise you right now that Saddam didn't invade Iran to murder every Persian on the planet, just like he didn't invade Kuwait to every ever Kuwait citizen.

On a side note, who would you want to win a war between the US and Iran?

And you obviously believe in Bush's stupid mantra of "you're either with us or you're against us." Iran thought Iraq was a terrorist state, but they were also against Operation "Iraqi Freedom". The world isn't black and white, you know.

 

[ntdz]

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: dahunan
Iran is a terrorist state

Look at what the Shiits in Iraq are doing with Irans SUPPORT

Look at the dumb ****** Hamas does with IRans SUPPORT

Why doesn't Iran actually help with educating the people of Palestine instead of using them as pawns in their religious war with Israel

I also don't believe one word these soldiers are being forced to say on TV.. It is also ILLEGAL to parade them around like TERRORISTS WOULD

They kidnapped these soldiers to USE -- the same way terrorists would.. Can you deny that?

oh please

U.S gave chemical weapons to Iraq to use on Iranians who were defending their country from an Arab invasion. Iraq used those chemical weapons and it eventually killed hundreds of thousands of people

Fast forward years later and the U.S invaded Iraq because of those very chemical weapons

The actions of the U.S have resulted in millions of people dead.

so Iran gives weapons to certain groups. Big deal. China and Russia do the same exact thing. Neither Iran or China or Russia are handing around chemical weapons.

It is the U.S who has done so.
So the U.S has ZERO right to call Iran a terrorist state.

I change my wording.. U.S is a terrorist/dangerous state when Republicans are in power.

Would you get off it already? You can spout the anti-American garbage all day long, it doesn't mean it's true. Look up the modern definition of terrorism, and explain to me how the US giving Iraq chemical weapons falls into that definition. Hell, the way Iran is behaving lately, I wish Iraq would've used more of it. Iran is our enemy, plain and simple.

So Iran is a terrorist state by giving Hezbollah weapons &

the U.S is NOT a terrorist state by giving a terrorist state chemical weapons?

What is your level of education ntdz? Seriously.

Iran acting lately? U.S invaded a country. Iran took 15 British soldiers hostage. Yeah Iran is much worse than the U.S again.

Iraq did not use the chemical weapons to terrorize anyone, they used them to win a war. Hezbollah is an organization built on terrorism. Iran took 15 BRITISH soldiers hostage, on a mission in Iraqi waters with a mandate from both Iraq and the UN...I don't think any other country would have the audacity to do such a thing. Now I read about some incident where Iran thought they were going to kidnap some American soldiers...are they are out of their mind? They would have the wrath of god brought upon them if they touched one of our soldiers.

win what war?
Saddam's goal was to murder every Persian on the planet.

Why the hell do you think Saddam invaded Iran?

Do you know anything about the things you post?

Iraq was listed as a terrorist state by the U.S. They then give this state chemical weapons.

You are saying Hezbollah is a bigger threat than Saddam's Iraq? YOU ARE CLUELESS.

You are living in a fantasy world. Must be nice. Hot women there?

Since you obviously believe Saddam was a big threat and Iraq a terrorist state, you must be for the war in Iraq then, right?

I can promise you right now that Saddam didn't invade Iran to murder every Persian on the planet, just like he didn't invade Kuwait to every ever Kuwait citizen.

uhm.. Iraq was on the list of terrorist states because it supported groups against Israel

Iran is on that list for the very same reasons.

Both are identical. Israel is what they have (had now) in common.

U.S gave weapons to a terrorist state that was conducting an illegal war to exterminate a population.

Saddam's last words were that he hates every Persian on the planet
Chemical weapons are illegal weapons. You are not allowed to use chemical weapons during war

And what was the soldier to civilian casualty ratio from chemical weapons in Iran during the Iran-Iraq war?

 

[Aimster]

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: dahunan
Iran is a terrorist state

Look at what the Shiits in Iraq are doing with Irans SUPPORT

Look at the dumb ****** Hamas does with IRans SUPPORT

Why doesn't Iran actually help with educating the people of Palestine instead of using them as pawns in their religious war with Israel

I also don't believe one word these soldiers are being forced to say on TV.. It is also ILLEGAL to parade them around like TERRORISTS WOULD

They kidnapped these soldiers to USE -- the same way terrorists would.. Can you deny that?

oh please

U.S gave chemical weapons to Iraq to use on Iranians who were defending their country from an Arab invasion. Iraq used those chemical weapons and it eventually killed hundreds of thousands of people

Fast forward years later and the U.S invaded Iraq because of those very chemical weapons

The actions of the U.S have resulted in millions of people dead.

so Iran gives weapons to certain groups. Big deal. China and Russia do the same exact thing. Neither Iran or China or Russia are handing around chemical weapons.

It is the U.S who has done so.
So the U.S has ZERO right to call Iran a terrorist state.

I change my wording.. U.S is a terrorist/dangerous state when Republicans are in power.

Would you get off it already? You can spout the anti-American garbage all day long, it doesn't mean it's true. Look up the modern definition of terrorism, and explain to me how the US giving Iraq chemical weapons falls into that definition. Hell, the way Iran is behaving lately, I wish Iraq would've used more of it. Iran is our enemy, plain and simple.

So Iran is a terrorist state by giving Hezbollah weapons &

the U.S is NOT a terrorist state by giving a terrorist state chemical weapons?

What is your level of education ntdz? Seriously.

Iran acting lately? U.S invaded a country. Iran took 15 British soldiers hostage. Yeah Iran is much worse than the U.S again.

Iraq did not use the chemical weapons to terrorize anyone, they used them to win a war. Hezbollah is an organization built on terrorism. Iran took 15 BRITISH soldiers hostage, on a mission in Iraqi waters with a mandate from both Iraq and the UN...I don't think any other country would have the audacity to do such a thing. Now I read about some incident where Iran thought they were going to kidnap some American soldiers...are they are out of their mind? They would have the wrath of god brought upon them if they touched one of our soldiers.

win what war?
Saddam's goal was to murder every Persian on the planet.

Why the hell do you think Saddam invaded Iran?

Do you know anything about the things you post?

Iraq was listed as a terrorist state by the U.S. They then give this state chemical weapons.

You are saying Hezbollah is a bigger threat than Saddam's Iraq? YOU ARE CLUELESS.

You are living in a fantasy world. Must be nice. Hot women there?

Since you obviously believe Saddam was a big threat and Iraq a terrorist state, you must be for the war in Iraq then, right?

I can promise you right now that Saddam didn't invade Iran to murder every Persian on the planet, just like he didn't invade Kuwait to every ever Kuwait citizen.

uhm.. Iraq was on the list of terrorist states because it supported groups against Israel

Iran is on that list for the very same reasons.

Both are identical. Israel is what they have (had now) in common.

U.S gave weapons to a terrorist state that was conducting an illegal war to exterminate a population.

Saddam's last words were that he hates every Persian on the planet
Chemical weapons are illegal weapons. You are not allowed to use chemical weapons during war

And what was the soldier to civilian casualty ratio from chemical weapons in Iran during the Iran-Iraq war?

You are not allowed to use chemical weapons at all.

Everyone fighting inside Iran was a soldier. Iran volunteered everyone to fight. It was a country united.

Everyone who died inside Iran was innocent. It was an illegal war started by the Arabs supported by the U.S

 

[tomywishbone]

Are people in *Sweden as scared of Iran, as America seems to be?

*insert any normal county

 

[Jhhnn]

Reminds me of the runup to the invasion of Iraq, where old intelligence was re-evaluated in the false light of 9/11.

Which is pretty much what's happening here, with the months old incident be re-examined in the false light of the capture of the British sailors...

Drag it out of obscurity, put some fresh spin on it- obvious cause for war, right?

Why, them Eye-raynians have been trying to kidnap our boys all along- Let's nuke 'em!

 

[jpeyton]

I'm seeing a common thread in all these Iran threads.

Republican mouthpieces running around like Chicken Little, suggesting Iran is responsible for everything wrong in the world, and how we should be dropping bombs by tomorrow.

People with a secondary education chiming in about how the situation is a bit more complex, how neither Iran nor the US are 100% right, and how diplomacy is the likely outcome for this conflict.

 

[BarneyFife]

Gotta love all of these new leaks appearing to get the American public to support another war. Look at all the suckers that fell for it in this thread. Next story is going to be about how Iran kidnapped 4 soldiers last summer and they sent in the Army Rangers in the middle of the night to rescue them in a downtown Tehran Nuclear facility. I'm sure they are sending that piece to Newsweek to be published next week.

 

[ProfJohn]

Originally posted by: Narmer

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Narmer
Where in that article does it say that the Iranians were trying to kidnap Americans? Did you even read what you posted?

Did you read it? Apparentely you missed the part where the Iranians told them if they tried to leave they'd be fired upon (this is in Iraqi territory).

I'm so sick and tired of Iran and all their BS...

How does that equate to kidnapping? Would you equate the capture of the Iranians in Iraq as kidnapping?

And if you're sick and tired of all their BS, report to your commander in chief, I'm sure he'll have no problem sending to the front line to die for him.

Do you think the Iranians didn't want the Americans to leave because they were about to have a BBQ?

"How does that equate to kidnapping? " What the hell kind of stupid ass comment is that?

 

[Narmer]

Originally posted by: ProfJohn

Originally posted by: Narmer

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Narmer
Where in that article does it say that the Iranians were trying to kidnap Americans? Did you even read what you posted?

Did you read it? Apparentely you missed the part where the Iranians told them if they tried to leave they'd be fired upon (this is in Iraqi territory).

I'm so sick and tired of Iran and all their BS...

How does that equate to kidnapping? Would you equate the capture of the Iranians in Iraq as kidnapping?

And if you're sick and tired of all their BS, report to your commander in chief, I'm sure he'll have no problem sending to the front line to die for him.

Do you think the Iranians didn't want the Americans to leave because they were about to have a BBQ?

"How does that equate to kidnapping? " What the hell kind of stupid ass comment is that?

You don't know what their intentions were? And you were not there. Furthermore, nothing was said about the Iraqis who did stood their ground and fought. Were they kidnapped?

I asked a question, now answer it? "How does that equate to kidnapping?" if they just told them not to leave? The answer is that it doesn't. I'm not surprised that you jumped to such a wild conclusion seeing that you bought the Iraq lie and still believe in the lie.

 

[ProfJohn]

Originally posted by: Narmer
You don't know what their intentions were? And you were not there. Furthermore, nothing was said about the Iraqis who did stood their ground and fought. Were they kidnapped?

I asked a question, now answer it? "How does that equate to kidnapping?" if they just told them not to leave? The answer is that it doesn't. I'm not surprised that you jumped to such a wild conclusion seeing that you bought the Iraq lie and still believe in the lie.

Ok, so I go into the house across the street with a gun and say "no body leaves, or I'll kill them"
What are the police going to charge me with? Kidnapping? Unlawful detention? etc etc.

Why would the Iranians tell them that no one leaves? The story reads like a set up. Get the attention of the Americans and the spring the trap with a platoon of men.
FIY a Platoon is about 30-50 troops, not a small amount and certainly more than any typical patrol I would guess.

 

[ntdz]

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: dahunan
Iran is a terrorist state

Look at what the Shiits in Iraq are doing with Irans SUPPORT

Look at the dumb ****** Hamas does with IRans SUPPORT

Why doesn't Iran actually help with educating the people of Palestine instead of using them as pawns in their religious war with Israel

I also don't believe one word these soldiers are being forced to say on TV.. It is also ILLEGAL to parade them around like TERRORISTS WOULD

They kidnapped these soldiers to USE -- the same way terrorists would.. Can you deny that?

oh please

U.S gave chemical weapons to Iraq to use on Iranians who were defending their country from an Arab invasion. Iraq used those chemical weapons and it eventually killed hundreds of thousands of people

Fast forward years later and the U.S invaded Iraq because of those very chemical weapons

The actions of the U.S have resulted in millions of people dead.

so Iran gives weapons to certain groups. Big deal. China and Russia do the same exact thing. Neither Iran or China or Russia are handing around chemical weapons.

It is the U.S who has done so.
So the U.S has ZERO right to call Iran a terrorist state.

I change my wording.. U.S is a terrorist/dangerous state when Republicans are in power.

Would you get off it already? You can spout the anti-American garbage all day long, it doesn't mean it's true. Look up the modern definition of terrorism, and explain to me how the US giving Iraq chemical weapons falls into that definition. Hell, the way Iran is behaving lately, I wish Iraq would've used more of it. Iran is our enemy, plain and simple.

So Iran is a terrorist state by giving Hezbollah weapons &

the U.S is NOT a terrorist state by giving a terrorist state chemical weapons?

What is your level of education ntdz? Seriously.

Iran acting lately? U.S invaded a country. Iran took 15 British soldiers hostage. Yeah Iran is much worse than the U.S again.

Iraq did not use the chemical weapons to terrorize anyone, they used them to win a war. Hezbollah is an organization built on terrorism. Iran took 15 BRITISH soldiers hostage, on a mission in Iraqi waters with a mandate from both Iraq and the UN...I don't think any other country would have the audacity to do such a thing. Now I read about some incident where Iran thought they were going to kidnap some American soldiers...are they are out of their mind? They would have the wrath of god brought upon them if they touched one of our soldiers.

win what war?
Saddam's goal was to murder every Persian on the planet.

Why the hell do you think Saddam invaded Iran?

Do you know anything about the things you post?

Iraq was listed as a terrorist state by the U.S. They then give this state chemical weapons.

You are saying Hezbollah is a bigger threat than Saddam's Iraq? YOU ARE CLUELESS.

You are living in a fantasy world. Must be nice. Hot women there?

Since you obviously believe Saddam was a big threat and Iraq a terrorist state, you must be for the war in Iraq then, right?

I can promise you right now that Saddam didn't invade Iran to murder every Persian on the planet, just like he didn't invade Kuwait to every ever Kuwait citizen.

uhm.. Iraq was on the list of terrorist states because it supported groups against Israel

Iran is on that list for the very same reasons.

Both are identical. Israel is what they have (had now) in common.

U.S gave weapons to a terrorist state that was conducting an illegal war to exterminate a population.

Saddam's last words were that he hates every Persian on the planet
Chemical weapons are illegal weapons. You are not allowed to use chemical weapons during war

And what was the soldier to civilian casualty ratio from chemical weapons in Iran during the Iran-Iraq war?

You are not allowed to use chemical weapons at all.

Everyone fighting inside Iran was a soldier. Iran volunteered everyone to fight. It was a country united.

Everyone who died inside Iran was innocent. It was an illegal war started by the Arabs supported by the U.S

Since when does what the UN or some stupid treaty says mean anything? None of hte countries enforce the treaties, rendering them useless (look at N Korea).

You never answered my question, who would you want to win a possible war between the US and Iran?

 

[Corbett]

Originally posted by: Aimster
I'm sorry that you are uneducated on the topic.

Wikipedia and Google are hardly an education.

Please provide proof you have an actual EDUCATION on the subject.

 

[thujone]

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: ntdz

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: dahunan
Iran is a terrorist state

Look at what the Shiits in Iraq are doing with Irans SUPPORT

Look at the dumb ****** Hamas does with IRans SUPPORT

Why doesn't Iran actually help with educating the people of Palestine instead of using them as pawns in their religious war with Israel

I also don't believe one word these soldiers are being forced to say on TV.. It is also ILLEGAL to parade them around like TERRORISTS WOULD

They kidnapped these soldiers to USE -- the same way terrorists would.. Can you deny that?

oh please

U.S gave chemical weapons to Iraq to use on Iranians who were defending their country from an Arab invasion. Iraq used those chemical weapons and it eventually killed hundreds of thousands of people

Fast forward years later and the U.S invaded Iraq because of those very chemical weapons

The actions of the U.S have resulted in millions of people dead.

so Iran gives weapons to certain groups. Big deal. China and Russia do the same exact thing. Neither Iran or China or Russia are handing around chemical weapons.

It is the U.S who has done so.
So the U.S has ZERO right to call Iran a terrorist state.

I change my wording.. U.S is a terrorist/dangerous state when Republicans are in power.

Would you get off it already? You can spout the anti-American garbage all day long, it doesn't mean it's true. Look up the modern definition of terrorism, and explain to me how the US giving Iraq chemical weapons falls into that definition. Hell, the way Iran is behaving lately, I wish Iraq would've used more of it. Iran is our enemy, plain and simple.

So Iran is a terrorist state by giving Hezbollah weapons &

the U.S is NOT a terrorist state by giving a terrorist state chemical weapons?

What is your level of education ntdz? Seriously.

Iran acting lately? U.S invaded a country. Iran took 15 British soldiers hostage. Yeah Iran is much worse than the U.S again.

Iraq did not use the chemical weapons to terrorize anyone, they used them to win a war. Hezbollah is an organization built on terrorism. Iran took 15 BRITISH soldiers hostage, on a mission in Iraqi waters with a mandate from both Iraq and the UN...I don't think any other country would have the audacity to do such a thing. Now I read about some incident where Iran thought they were going to kidnap some American soldiers...are they are out of their mind? They would have the wrath of god brought upon them if they touched one of our soldiers.

win what war?
Saddam's goal was to murder every Persian on the planet.

Why the hell do you think Saddam invaded Iran?

Do you know anything about the things you post?

Iraq was listed as a terrorist state by the U.S. They then give this state chemical weapons.

You are saying Hezbollah is a bigger threat than Saddam's Iraq? YOU ARE CLUELESS.

You are living in a fantasy world. Must be nice. Hot women there?

Since you obviously believe Saddam was a big threat and Iraq a terrorist state, you must be for the war in Iraq then, right?

I can promise you right now that Saddam didn't invade Iran to murder every Persian on the planet, just like he didn't invade Kuwait to every ever Kuwait citizen.

uhm.. Iraq was on the list of terrorist states because it supported groups against Israel

Iran is on that list for the very same reasons.

Both are identical. Israel is what they have (had now) in common.

U.S gave weapons to a terrorist state that was conducting an illegal war to exterminate a population.

Saddam's last words were that he hates every Persian on the planet
Chemical weapons are illegal weapons. You are not allowed to use chemical weapons during war

And what was the soldier to civilian casualty ratio from chemical weapons in Iran during the Iran-Iraq war?

You are not allowed to use chemical weapons at all.

Everyone fighting inside Iran was a soldier. Iran volunteered everyone to fight. It was a country united.

Everyone who died inside Iran was innocent. It was an illegal war started by the Arabs supported by the U.S

Since when does what the UN or some stupid treaty says mean anything? None of hte countries enforce the treaties, rendering them useless (look at N Korea).

You never answered my question, who would you want to win a possible war between the US and Iran?

people continue to break laws every day. many of these laws are old laws no longer upheald.

therefore i should be able to legally shoot someone in the face?

 

[International Machine Consortium]

Originally posted by: Mxylplyx

Originally posted by: Aimster
Border patrol in Iran is not the job of the Regular Iranian Army. It is the job of the average citizen who has been given 2 years to serve in the country.

There are numerous videos on the Internet with troops from Afghanistan (NATO) entering Iran. Iranian troops surround them and tell them to leave.

When you are patrolling borders, there is no white line to tell you where you are. I'm sure U.S patrols have crossed into Iran on numerous incidents. U.S already violates Iranian airspace which could be a sign of war.

Also it might not have been Iranian troops since Kurdish rebels operate near the Iraqi border.

Why dont you just move to Iran since you love it so much?

Settle down dear. Try to control your anxiety.

 

[International Machine Consortium]

Originally posted by: Aimster

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Tango

Originally posted by: dahunan
Iran is a terrorist state

Look at what the Shiits in Iraq are doing with Irans SUPPORT

Look at the dumb ****** Hamas does with IRans SUPPORT

Why doesn't Iran actually help with educating the people of Palestine instead of using them as pawns in their religious war with Israel

I also don't believe one word these soldiers are being forced to say on TV.. It is also ILLEGAL to parade them around like TERRORISTS WOULD

They kidnapped these soldiers to USE -- the same way terrorists would.. Can you deny that?

Well, actually the arrested soldiers do not fall within the Geneva convention as Iran and the US are not currently at war. So technically it is not illegal to show images of them on TV.

This doesn't make it less despicable, just not illegal.

Thank you ... then isn't there some sort of International Law surrounding their abuse of these soldiers and kidnapping for political purposes

It is very disgusting and I cannot believe the Iranian Govt thinks it is acceptable..

Maybe they forgot about the last time their RELIGION OF PEACE followers abducted innocent Americans?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_hostage_crisis

You lack an education in the topic you are discussing.

The hostage taking was not the action of the Iranian Regime.

It happened during a revolution. Students tookover the hostages. Those students were members of a group called MEK. MEK was seeking a different type of government inside Iran. Like I said during a revolution the government is not stable. The only reason Iran's government became stable was because the Arabs invaded.

Iran is now against MEK. So therefore, Iran appears to be against the very people who took the hostages.

One of their principle operators is the president now. They've hardly been sidelined. They're the ones holding the Brit hostages.
That's the only point I had to make. I don't totally disagree with everything you're saying.

 

[daniel49]

Originally posted by: tomywishbone
Are people in *Sweden as scared of Iran, as America seems to be?

*insert any normal county

no, because they know if there are any real problems, Sweden won't be the one dealing with them.
That is until there own muslum population starts being radicalized.