Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Physx is way overhyped imho. Why spend the money before games that require physx are out?
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Physx is way overhyped imho. Why spend the money before games that require physx are out?
Originally posted by: shangshang
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Physx is way overhyped imho. Why spend the money before games that require physx are out?
might wanna try google
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Physx is way overhyped imho. Why spend the money before games that require physx are out?
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Physx is way overhyped imho. Why spend the money before games that require physx are out?
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Physx is way overhyped imho. Why spend the money before games that require physx are out?
Why do the same people come into every physx thread to crap it?
There ARE games out already, and more on the way. Holy smokes.
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Physx is way overhyped imho. Why spend the money before games that require physx are out?
Why do the same people come into every physx thread to crap it?
There ARE games out already, and more on the way. Holy smokes.
Originally posted by: ajaidevsingh
I am a bit confused, Do u not need an SLi m/b to hook up two Nvidia's even if its for Physx??
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: shangshang
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Physx is way overhyped imho. Why spend the money before games that require physx are out?
might wanna try google
There aren't too many AAA titles that require PhysX hardware (lots support software PhysX) to get a great playing experience. The only "game" I've seen that might need it is Warmonger. Something like GRAW2 was unimpressive IMO.
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
PhysX doesn't seem to be very taxing on the shaders. I have a 780A motherboard that I can use the onboard graphics to run Physx. I think the onboard is either an 8200 or 8300 equivalent. Maybe 16 shaders. I'll have to check up on that.
But until I get to that, I guess I can disable the shaders on my 8800GTS 512 here and use it for PhysX only. I'm guessing I can get it all the way down to 16, or maybe even 8 shaders to try it out. Only problem is, Riva Tuner 2.09 has no idea what these new drivers are yet. 177.83's. So, we may have to wait for the next update for RT.
Originally posted by: shangshang
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Physx is way overhyped imho. Why spend the money before games that require physx are out?
Why do the same people come into every physx thread to crap it?
There ARE games out already, and more on the way. Holy smokes.
insecurity, jealousy, penis envy, mine is bigger than yours, etc,
Sometimes I question people who say something is overrated or overhyped. Do these people ever stop to think, "Overrated and overhyped compared to what?"
IMO, for people with an Intel P35 mobo and an existing NV card, adding an el cheapo 88xx card in an otherwise unused pcie slot is a brilliant upgrade for physx games.
Tell you what I wouldn't wanna be an ATI fanboy when more physx titles are released in mass!
Originally posted by: Azn
Originally posted by: shangshang
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Physx is way overhyped imho. Why spend the money before games that require physx are out?
Why do the same people come into every physx thread to crap it?
There ARE games out already, and more on the way. Holy smokes.
insecurity, jealousy, penis envy, mine is bigger than yours, etc,
Sometimes I question people who say something is overrated or overhyped. Do these people ever stop to think, "Overrated and overhyped compared to what?"
IMO, for people with an Intel P35 mobo and an existing NV card, adding an el cheapo 88xx card in an otherwise unused pcie slot is a brilliant upgrade for physx games.
Tell you what I wouldn't wanna be an ATI fanboy when more physx titles are released in mass!
Think for a minute what this does? It really doesn't do anything special except what we already get visually. The difference is so insignificant and drops your fps by a bunch.
I have a g92 and no way jealous of this feature. It's just another over hyped feature so Nvidia can sell more vid cards.
Who cares when CPU can do the exact same thing.
Originally posted by: nitromullet
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
PhysX doesn't seem to be very taxing on the shaders. I have a 780A motherboard that I can use the onboard graphics to run Physx. I think the onboard is either an 8200 or 8300 equivalent. Maybe 16 shaders. I'll have to check up on that.
But until I get to that, I guess I can disable the shaders on my 8800GTS 512 here and use it for PhysX only. I'm guessing I can get it all the way down to 16, or maybe even 8 shaders to try it out. Only problem is, Riva Tuner 2.09 has no idea what these new drivers are yet. 177.83's. So, we may have to wait for the next update for RT.
Out of curiosity, any word or info if it would be possible to run a PhysX compatible GeForce card solely for PhysX alongside an ATI card for video on an Intel chipset motherboard?