• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Second Amendment

AFB

Lifer
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

How do you personally define "arms"? Clubs? Knives? Pistols? Rifles? ARs? Granades? Mortars? RPGs? Nukes?
 
question, why would a non collector civilians need mortars, RPGs, nuke, Granades, and fully automatic assault rifles and machine guns?
 
Some people would like that to mean muskets & bows and arrows.

I prefer to think of it as any non-military firearm
 
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

How do you personally define "arms"? Clubs? Knives? Pistols? Rifles? ARs? Granades? Mortars? RPGs? Nukes?

Whatever arms are necessary for a well-regulated militia to be able to defend the security of a free state.
 
Anything that would give the people a fighting chance against their government should they decide it shouldn't be in place anymore.
 
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
question, why would a non collector civilians need mortars, RPGs, nuke, Granades, and fully automatic assault rifles and machine guns?

But who's right is it to determine what civilians need as far as arms? The same liberals who don't want others defining when life starts, or who you can marry, want to choose what arms you can and can't own. :roll:

(I have never owned a gun in my life. Just a strong supporter of freedom.)
 
When you graduate high school take some classes in college about interpretation of laws and amendments.
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

How do you personally define "arms"? Clubs? Knives? Pistols? Rifles? ARs? Granades? Mortars? RPGs? Nukes?

Whatever arms are necessary for a well-regulated militia to be able to defend the security of a free state.


HURRAY!!!
:beer: :beer: :beer:
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

How do you personally define "arms"? Clubs? Knives? Pistols? Rifles? ARs? Granades? Mortars? RPGs? Nukes?

Whatever arms are necessary for a well-regulated militia to be able to defend the security of a free state.

and to turn an intruder into a fine pink powdered mist....
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

How do you personally define "arms"? Clubs? Knives? Pistols? Rifles? ARs? Granades? Mortars? RPGs? Nukes?

Whatever arms are necessary for a well-regulated militia to be able to defend the security of a free state.

:beer:
 
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
How do you personally define "arms"? Clubs? Knives? Pistols? Rifles? ARs? Granades? Mortars? RPGs? Nukes?
Whatever arms are necessary for a well-regulated militia to be able to defend the security of a free state.
WINNER! :beer:

The well-regulated militia btw is the common men, allowed to keep arms and to train themselves in the use of arms (not the national guard or any other professional or semi-professional military). In other words, the regular citizens, those same brave men who helped the Founding Fathers win the Revolutionary War, aka citizen soldiers, the same ones that were also considered indispensible in America winning WWII.

In general, "arms" are defined as those weapons that the common military infantry would carry on their persons; rifles, pistols, swords, etc. Grenades are considered to be explosives, which are ordinance. Cannons were not considered to be arms in Revolutionary War times, but artillery, and today that would include mortars, rpgs, nukes, tomahawk cruise missiles, etc.
 
Originally posted by: Rob9874
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
question, why would a non collector civilians need mortars, RPGs, nuke, Granades, and fully automatic assault rifles and machine guns?

But who's right is it to determine what civilians need as far as arms? The same liberals who don't want others defining when life starts, or who you can marry, want to choose what arms you can and can't own. :roll:

(I have never owned a gun in my life. Just a strong supporter of freedom.)

you compairing gun control to gay rights and abortion?😕
 
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: Rob9874
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
question, why would a non collector civilians need mortars, RPGs, nuke, Granades, and fully automatic assault rifles and machine guns?

But who's right is it to determine what civilians need as far as arms? The same liberals who don't want others defining when life starts, or who you can marry, want to choose what arms you can and can't own. :roll:

(I have never owned a gun in my life. Just a strong supporter of freedom.)

you compairing gun control to gay rights and abortion?😕

I do not separate political issues concerning rights. That is correct.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
How do you personally define "arms"? Clubs? Knives? Pistols? Rifles? ARs? Granades? Mortars? RPGs? Nukes?
Whatever arms are necessary for a well-regulated militia to be able to defend the security of a free state.
WINNER! :beer:

The well-regulated militia btw is the common men, allowed to keep arms and to train themselves in the use of arms (not the national guard or any other professional or semi-professional military). In other words, the regular citizens, those same brave men who helped the Founding Fathers win the Revolutionary War, aka citizen soldiers, the same ones that were also considered indispensible in America winning WWII.

In general, "arms" are defined as those weapons that the common military infantry would carry on their persons; rifles, pistols, swords, etc. Grenades are considered to be explosives, which are ordinance. Cannons were not considered to be arms in Revolutionary War times, but artillery, and today that would include mortars, rpgs, nukes, tomahawk cruise missiles, etc.

Winner #2!!! :beer: :beer:

This is exactly right, folks. The "arms" in the Second Amendment are those commonly carried by an infantry soldier and the like.
 
Back
Top