Sec Def and the DC NG

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
Please explain specifically how this use of executive authority is a violation of "checks and balances." The executive branch already had this power on January 6, 2021, but the persons in the chain of authority were terrified of acting against Trump. They should have acted and forced him to countermand their orders so the responsibility would have been clear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shortylickens
Nov 17, 2019
13,432
7,904
136
^^ If SecDef is sympathetic to an action, they may refuse to activate to thwart that action. If DCPD needs help, they need it now. They should not have to wait for approval from someone who might deny them for the wrong reasons.

A political appointee should not be the last word on something like this.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,905
6,788
126
^^ If SecDef is sympathetic to an action, they may refuse to activate to thwart that action. If DCPD needs help, they need it now. They should not have to wait for approval from someone who might deny them for the wrong reasons.

A political appointee should not be the last word on something like this.
One question. Couldn't a non political appointment still be political and couldn't a politican appointment act in a non-political manner?
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
Personally (and the aberration of the Trump Administration notwithstanding) I'm personally a LOT more comfortable with civilian control of the police and military forces than having the final authority rest in a benevolent autocracy. That is one of the genius' of the American system-the recognition by all the military that the Constitution is the ultimate authority.

OTOH when or if we reach the point that the Constitution becomes a meaningless document, no bureaucracy is going to save us. I still ask what sort of "checks and balances" are you looking for and shouldn't the ultimate authority over police and military powers reside under civilian control and ultimately by elected officials, subject to the constraints of the Constitution?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and Ken g6