<<
Ha, sounds like all the "Linux" guys are pissed off because if this enjoys any success at all, it will mean less attention for their OS of choice, which is dead in the water anyway as a desktop. When I hear about how people should "learn the OS" it makes me wonder just how far out of touch with reality some people are. 95 percent of the computer using population has NO INTEREST in learning command lines, how to compile a kernel, or using a terminal to start a program, or editing LILO with vi. If you think Linux is so special that only 5 percent of the populace ever deserves to use it, FINE, but if that is that case, it will never be more than a marginal OS, and will never be commercially important, because it will never MAKE ANY MONEY, and the good games and software WILL NEVER BE PORTED, EVER. Look at what has happened to the stock prices of Red Hat and VA Systems if you don't believe that...you so-called Linux fans should be happy for ANY attention you get, its the ONLY thing that will help Linux grow into more than a 5 percent (who are we kidding, more like .5 percent, the rest is MacOS) margin. Don't complain about not being able to play your games on Linux or not having ports of programs you like...IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN...why?...because it doesn't MAKE ANY MONEY for the people who have tried it...(Loki Games). Lindows, if it ever gets off the ground, and thats a BIG if, may offer the last real hope of competing with Microsoft with ANYTHING. Its obvious all the Linux distros have failed miserably, (and I've noticed that over the last year most of them have disappeared from store shelves as well) not to mention that they aren't any more stable than the latest versions of Windows. Now I hear that AOL may buy Red Hat...hah! If that isn't the boomerang coming full circle, I don't know what is...the company that dumbed the internet down to the lowest possible level buying the "smart" OS....heh.
You "computer enthusiasts" should really quit arguing about what version of Linux or BSD or AmigaOS or whatever is best, or whether kernel 2.2.13.011.0034.000067 is better than 2.2.13.011.0034.000065, and maybe give a little support to someone who is really trying to compete against a monopoly, while there is still a point in anybody trying to. Why the hell do you think Microsoft is suing? They really see this as a threat, unlike Red Hat, SuSE, Mandrake, etc., etc., etc., because they think people in THEIR user base, the one they care about, THE 95%, might actually buy THIS, and not THEIRS.
Wake up. >>
hmm...you seem kind of angry, you should have that checked out

i dont think any linux geeks are going to lose any sleep if their 8 year old brother isn't using linux. and i dont see how you think that linux is going to go down the drain, obviously you don't understand it.
<<
The fact is that Linux lags far behind in all kinds of hardware support, and always will. >>
i dont think the "always will" argument is very valid. sure, linux hardware support isnt the same as windows, but you can get most things working just fine.
<<
I have no hardware newer than a year old, and I still can't get everything to work with any current Linux distro. >>
what piece of hardware isnt working?
<<
That, and the fact that things like 3d support are rudimentary or nonexistent, doesn't make for a compelling argument to switch, >>
obviously you don't know about wine/winex, like nothinman said in another thread, some games actually run faster on linux than windows. are you speaking from experience or assumptions?
<<
no matter how "superior" an OS it supposedly is... >>
you say that sarcastically, i guess if you want to think that windows is superior, you're entitled to your opinion
<<
and then there's the fact that you simply can't run your current software. >>
so what? some software is the same (netscape, mozilla), and most others have competent substitutes, and many times, more than are available for windows. go to freshmeat.net and search for "text editor" or anything else. theres plenty of software for linux.
<<
If you really think that your Windows software is bloated and doesn't function well, then Linux would not satisfy you, since the software offerings leave much to be desired. >>
once again, are you speaking from experience or assumptions? have you ever tried out different software besides the ones that gnome/kde give you?
<<
Sure, they are free, by and large, but companies don't make any money on free stuff, so there is no incentive to do any serious development. >>
its called personal acheivement. you don't become a good gardener because you can make alot of money, but you still become good right?
<<
The really good Linux software is the stuff ou have to pay for, just like for Windows. >>
you talk and talk about how linux users are stuck up and pissy and all that, yet you spew the most incorrect crap.
<<
Linux in the minds of many, if not most, of it's affficianados it seems, is mainly about them knowing more about it than you do...at least that seems to be the prevalent attitude. Its kind of like an exclusive club that doesn't really want you to join, even though they never stop telling you how great it is. >>
sure the linux community is a bit elitest, but i dont see them begging grandma to come watch them install slackware. keep in mind, the ones who want everyone and their brother using linux tend to be the people who will profit from it monetatarily. sure, i'd like to see everyone using linux instead of windows, but its not gonna happen for a while.
<<
Of course, when it can't do what you want it to, the attitude is that you don't really need to do that anyway. >>
what cant it do? game? nobody ever suggests to give up gaming for linux.
<<
If thats what they want, fine, they can run an Atari 400 and load their programs from cassettes if they want, just don't tell me its better to do it that way. The fact is, Unix as an architecture is burdened with a ton of irrelevant components, legacy of a multi-user mainframe envirionment, and is just as outdated as the Windows architecture is, and they should both be replaced with something better. >>
hmmm..ok. the fact is, with linux you can get rid of all of the crap you find unnecessary. with windows, what do you have a choice about? you can uninstall pinball and wordpad, but you're stuck with their gui, and their whole architecture. like elledan said, linux can run on a pda, or something even smaller. its totally customizable. ever heard of those distros on a floppy like the linux router project? try doing that with windows. oh, and i think theres more than enough benchmarks to prove linux's worthiness.