werepossum
Elite Member
- Jul 10, 2006
- 29,873
- 463
- 126
That first is a good point. I'd have no objection to removing consanguinity restrictions for same-sex couples who cannot procreate normally.The problem with that definition is that "not within prohibited bounds of consanguinity" only makes sense as a constraint if you embrace a traditional view of marriage being about procreation. A view which also naturally makes SSM nonsensical.
Because part of marriage is about demanding that the government or one's neighbors approve of your relationship.
That is an argument in favor of eliminating all marriage. Not in favor of SSM.
You are not required to approve of others' marriages, merely to recognize them and not discriminate against them.