Scott Walkers Austerity measures have brought job creation down to 44th in two years

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
If you want to know how much worse our economic recovery could be, check out Scott Walker’s austerity-rocked Wisconsin — which has gone from 11th in job creation to 44th in just two years.

Walker stormed into office in 2011 on the crest of a Tea Party wave and immediately added $117.2 million to the budget deficit with a series of tax cuts that did nothing to spur job creation. He “paid” for these cuts in part with an attack on public workers that he failed to mention in his campaign that he was going to pursue.

The governor and his Republican majorities cut workers’ salaries by about eight percent across the board, eliminated collective-bargaining rights and essentially tied any future wage increases to the rate of inflation.

The growing budget deficit Walker inherited was mostly the result of the financial crisis. Investors enabled by conservative politicians had collaborated to create the worst economic crash since the last time investors and conservative politicians had crashed the economy.

But who was Walker going to make pay for this downturn? Teachers — and other state and local workers — because they still had decent jobs, unlike the millions who lost their livelihoods thanks to Wall Street.

Where did Walker get the idea to go after workers? It was a well-concealed fact in the run-up to the 2010 election — as Republicans were still trying to pretend their goal was to “protect” Medicare — that the Tea Party was a sleeper cell for some of the nation’s most powerful anti-tax, pro-corporate billionaires who had been trying to trigger a “non-partisan” populist movement for decades to destroy the one thing standing in the way of completely privatizing the American government — unions.

Walker saw himself as a new Ronald Reagan — who had led the assault on public workers when he fired all of America’s air traffic controllers during his first year in office. We know this because Walker made the comparison himself when he was crank-called by someone posing as billionaire David Koch.

The state erupted, triggering recalls, including one of Walker himself. Walker won — thanks to voters rejecting the idea of a recall and Walker’s right-wing allies outspending Democrats and labor by an 8-1 margin.

So Wisconsin still has Scott Walker and Wisconsin has fallen to 44th in job creation.

Why? Let’s ask the governor.

“The first year we had a lot of protests in the state,” Walker said recently. “We had two years’, almost, worth of recalls. A lot of employers here I think can relate to the fact (that) uncertainty is one of the biggest challenges for employers big or small or anywhere in between. There was a lot of uncertainty. The good news is that’s passed.”

LOL.

It couldn’t be Walker’s policies — it has to be the way people reacted to his deception and assault on workers.

Of course, people have other opinions.

“The only question is, ‘Why are we doing so poorly?’” said Jack Norman, former research director of the liberal Institute for Wisconsin’s Future. “The plunge in job growth, compared with other states, coincides exactly with Scott Walker’s time in office. This is no mere coincidence. . . . Act 10 led to large cuts in public workers’ take-home pay, which was a blow to the state’s economy.”

One thing Scott Walker clearly promised to do in his campaign was create 250,000 jobs. So far he’s created between 44,600 and 60,000, depending on which report you believe.

So now that no more recalls are planned Walker and there isn’t any more “uncertainty,” certainly things will get better. To make sure of this, Walker is proposing a tax cut that — of course — would disportionately help out the rich:

Screen-Shot-2013-03-31-at-9.21.33-AM.png


Despite his failure to live up to his promise of creating jobs, Walker is still a hero in conservative circles.

He received some of the loudest applause at CPAC, and the right sees him as such an important national figure (and potential Republican 2016 nominee for president) that he’s weighing in on national issues. For example, he thinks same-sex marriage should be left to the states — because they’re so much better at discrimination.

How could such an epic failure of a governor, literally ranked 44th out of 50 in the criterion that matters most to voters, be considered a hero? It’s simple. In every way that matters to the major donors of the Republican Party, he’s a champ.

He took on the unions, cut worker pay and proposed a tax cut that mostly helps the rich.

Heck, in 2012 the GOP nominated a guy who was 47th in job creation as governor — a guy who cared so much about destroying unions that he said “Let Detroit Go Bankrupt,” just to try to make that happen a little faster.

Obviously, for the billionaires behind the Republican Party, attacking the unions and blaming them for the problems conservative economics have created is more important than anything — maybe even winning elections.

Link to article
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Walker stormed into office in 2011 on the crest of a Tea Party wave and immediately added $117.2 million to the budget deficit with a series of tax cuts that did nothing to spur job creation. He “paid” for these cuts in part with an attack on public workers that he failed to mention in his campaign that he was going to pursue.

He just got done what other states wish they could do. Look down at Illinois with our Democratic governor fighting to reduce the public pensions, Chicago's mayor fighting to get fiscal control to the school system against the unions. Wisconsin's unemployment rate is also 2% better than Illinois.

Where did Walker get the idea to go after workers? It was a well-concealed fact in the run-up to the 2010 election — as Republicans were still trying to pretend their goal was to “protect” Medicare — that the Tea Party was a sleeper cell for some of the nation’s most powerful anti-tax, pro-corporate billionaires who had been trying to trigger a “non-partisan” populist movement for decades to destroy the one thing standing in the way of completely privatizing the American government — unions.

Tea Party has zero power, zero influence in Illinois government, yet the state is fighting against the public sector unions.
 
Last edited:

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Since "protecting Medicare" was a part of this article too, I'll also mention that, well Medicare is dealt federally, Medicaid in Illinois is damn near collapsed, our state is so late in paying doctors, hospitals, nursing homes, etc., it's an absolute joke. Wisconsin with their budget surplus is protecting social programs a lot more than the liberal stronghold of Illinois.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
ausm - is that you?


It couldn&#8217;t be Walker&#8217;s policies &#8212; it has to be the way people reacted to his deception and assault on workers.

How much money did his opponents cause to be wasted because of sour grapes?
Given the fact that the recall failed; blame the opponents, not the people.

You are aware that people actually pay taxes from their wages to support public workers.
Public workers do not have printed money behind their paychecks.

The state budget had to be brought into balance; that meant either increasing taxes or cutting expenses.
Job losses occur in all states, some are hit harder than others because of how their economy is structured.

You found a hit piece in a liberal rag - Congrats - Head over to Madison and look up your counterpart.
 
Last edited:

2timer

Golden Member
Apr 20, 2012
1,803
1
0
Sigh. More hypocritical policy by the right wing, making the rich richer and the poor poorer. It makes me sad, honestly.
 

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
Sigh. More hypocritical policy by the right wing, making the rich richer and the poor poorer. It makes me sad, honestly.
Rise up and throw that bloody boot off your neck comrade! Words aren't going to get the job done. Progressive utopia will not be achieved from behind a keyboard. Surely there are some rich Democrats willing to cover your back.

John Kerry - $199 million
Mark Warner - $86 million
Jay Rockefeller - $83 million
Richard Blumenthal - $79 million
Dianne Feinstein - $41.8 million
Nancy Pelosi - $26.4
Claire McCaskill - $15.6 million

All of them and more just waiting to help out the little guy like yourself. Just think what you could achieve if they shared some of their wealth with you.

Psyche! They're not gonna do that. They didn't get where they are today by thinking small like you do. They learned a long time ago how to make the system work for them. They could care less about you. You're just a means for them to get more. You'll gladly pay that increased gasoline tax. You'll gladly pay higher income taxes and pay more than your share of Obamacare. You'll pay more for your utilities, more for food, more for everything because they tell you that's the road to prosperity.

They didn't tell it's the road to their prosperity. They're counting on you to not think for yourself and to follow their orders. I know you won't let them down.
 

Oldgamer

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2013
3,280
1
0
I honestly have no sympathy for Wisconsin, they voted him into office, and they didn't vote for the recall and believed all his nonsense. You get what you vote for.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
I honestly have no sympathy for Wisconsin, they voted him into office, and they didn't vote for the recall and believed all his nonsense. You get what you vote for.

I thought liberals were supposed to be empathetic to their fellow man and only conservative suffered some personality defect (EDD) that prevented them being that way. It appears that you have the same personality defect.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2309933
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Rise up and throw that bloody boot off your neck comrade! Words aren't going to get the job done. Progressive utopia will not be achieved from behind a keyboard. Surely there are some rich Democrats willing to cover your back.

John Kerry - $199 million
Mark Warner - $86 million
Jay Rockefeller - $83 million
Richard Blumenthal - $79 million
Dianne Feinstein - $41.8 million
Nancy Pelosi - $26.4
Claire McCaskill - $15.6 million

All of them and more just waiting to help out the little guy like yourself. Just think what you could achieve if they shared some of their wealth with you.

Psyche! They're not gonna do that. They didn't get where they are today by thinking small like you do. They learned a long time ago how to make the system work for them. They could care less about you. You're just a means for them to get more. You'll gladly pay that increased gasoline tax. You'll gladly pay higher income taxes and pay more than your share of Obamacare. You'll pay more for your utilities, more for food, more for everything because they tell you that's the road to prosperity.

They didn't tell it's the road to their prosperity. They're counting on you to not think for yourself and to follow their orders. I know you won't let them down.

Nice :thumbsup:

Just think how much could be done if they were do recycle 10-20% of that wealth back into the communities for social programs and/or projects

New money has a multiplier of 3 to 5. Dumping in 100M would be a value in the end of $500M moving through

But those rich DEMOCRATS do not want that to happen; they would rather have the taxpayer foot the bill.
 
Last edited:

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,475
16,933
136

I thought liberals were supposed to be empathetic to their fellow man and only conservative suffered some personality defect (EDD) that prevented them being that way. It appears that you have the same personality defect.

http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2309933

I'm sure you will respond to that post as well in the same manner, right?
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,475
16,933
136
Nice :thumbsup:

Just think how much could be done if they were do recycle 10-20% of that wealth back into the communities for social programs and/or projects

New money has a multiplier of 3 to 5. Dumping in 100M would be a value in the end of $500M moving through

But those rich DEMOCRATS do not want that to happen; they would rather have the taxpayer foot the bill.

Yes and the alternative is so much better: 31 of the top 50 are republicans, what's your point?

http://www.rollcall.com/50richest/the-50-richest-members-of-congress-112th-2012.html
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
I love that in liberals minds higher taxes are not austerity.

If only the public union workers had more money, and everyone else less, everything wo
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
The OP's article looks to have cherry picked one statistic and built a whole (misleading) story around it.

In Wisconsin, private sector employment fell by 6.8 percent from January 2008 to February 2010. Since February 2010, private sector employment has grown by 4.3 percent
http://www.jec.senate.gov/public//i...&File_id=44c513d6-b750-41e1-b6a0-510c759f5387

Wisconsin ranks in the upper half (24th) for unemployment. I noticed recent data show both a rise in jobs and unemployment. Could be that people are gaining hope and coming off the sidelines to again look for work.

http://www.bls.gov/web/laus/laumstrk.htm

http://www.bls.gov/eag/eag.wi.htm

Wisconsin's numbers aren't awesome, but they are a far cry from the OP's dismal representation.

Fern
 

*kjm

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 1999
2,222
6
81
And if they got the mine bill through it would create a ton of jobs up north and for Caterpillar.
 

zsdersw

Lifer
Oct 29, 2003
10,505
2
0
The funny thing is, Walker loves two of the biggest and costliest public-sector unions: police and firefighter unions. Those unions were not neutered like the teacher's union was.

I find that immensely hypocritical on his part.
 

desura

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2013
4,627
129
101
The funny thing is, Walker loves two of the biggest and costliest public-sector unions: police and firefighter unions. Those unions were not neutered like the teacher's union was.

I find that immensely hypocritical on his part.

agreed.

There's also subtle misogyny at work here.

The "laboratory of the states" makes for interesting viewing.

Anyone have info on Chris Christie in NJ? For all of his bluster, I get the impression that NJ is only doing so-so under him.