Scientists want a BIGGER Hadron Collider

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ScottyB

Diamond Member
Jan 28, 2002
6,677
1
0
Of course scientists want a bigger hardon. Why do you think they became scientists in the first place?
 

tatteredpotato

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2006
3,934
0
76
The US should start building the Superconducting Super Collider again and not fuck it up this time. It's a shame we've given up the lead in areas like this.

This. Our government would rather fund dead-end social programs as opposed to scientific research that (along with other things) actually made the US the superpower that it is.

I just hope Fermi gets the Higgs before LHC.
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
This. Our government would rather fund dead-end social programs as opposed to scientific research that (along with other things) actually made the US the superpower that it is.

I just hope Fermi gets the Higgs before LHC.

It would be awesome to see the guys at Fermilab find these things before the folks at Cern.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,407
17,939
126
The 270,000km one would be circular too though :p


my point was that it would be kindda hard to build a linear 270,000km accelerator :p

Notice the mention of gravitational variance and earth's curvature :p


It can double as a space elevator while not accelerating particles :p
 
Last edited:

AyashiKaibutsu

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2004
9,306
4
81
They should just upgrade the current LHC. They already have a planned upgrade that would increase the visibility of the results 10X. Just do it now bitches.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Large_Hadron_Collider

All colliders have planned upgrades since you get diminishing returns on the same tests (less to learn after doing it a few times). There's a limit to how much you can upgrade them though and then you need to move to a bigger one.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
I wouldn't say the LHC has been "fraught with problems." Sure there have been issues, but that's to be expected considering that nobody has ever built anything like this before.
That, and I believe they refer to it as "the most complex machine humanity has ever built."
 

Patranus

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2007
9,280
0
0
Maybe they should work on getting the current one fully operations and then we can talk about building another one.
 

darkxshade

Lifer
Mar 31, 2001
13,749
6
81
Maybe they should work on getting the current one fully operations and then we can talk about building another one.


That one has already been destroyed by rebel scum... it's time to build a new and fully operational hardon collider!!! Fire at will commander!
 

phoenix79

Golden Member
Jan 17, 2000
1,598
0
0
my point was that it would be kindda hard to build a linear 270,000km accelerator :p

Notice the mention of gravitational variance and earth's curvature :p


It can double as a space elevator while not accelerating particles :p
A VERY fast space elevator. Not one I'm sure I'd want to ride in it.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,407
17,939
126
A VERY fast space elevator. Not one I'm sure I'd want to ride in it.

na, as mass goes up, the speed drops dramatically.

come to think of it, maybe we should be thinking rotary acceleration of package and release at the right time to sling the package up into space.

Not for humans of course :p
 

TecHNooB

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
7,458
1
76
In a video I saw, Michio Kaku explains that a larger collider was originally what physicists had proposed but Congress rejected it so they had to settle with the current LHC. So it's not hard to see why they want a bigger one.
 

Kelvrick

Lifer
Feb 14, 2001
18,422
5
81
That one has already been destroyed by rebel scum... it's time to build a new and fully operational hardon collider!!! Fire at will commander!

Yea, the current security system is a little weak.

sp_1306_02.jpg