• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Scientists release report on climate change, subverting The Donald.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
If you truly believe that...you're a complete moron.

So you are going with bullshit rather than answering.

While saying that I realize that you may have been answering that as a question and you do actually realize that evolution, from a common ancestor, and man made climate change is real.

If so I have you pegged wrong and it's possible I have you confused with someone else but I could have sworn I have seen you arguing against reality in both topics.

If that is not the case then my apologies.
 
So you are going with bullshit rather than answering.

While saying that I realize that you may have been answering that as a question and you do actually realize that evolution, from a common ancestor, and man made climate change is real.

If so I have you pegged wrong and it's possible I have you confused with someone else but I could have sworn I have seen you arguing against reality in both topics.

If that is not the case then my apologies.
Thank you. You apparently have me confused with someone else....perhaps the boogeyman who lives under your bed.
 
i love how this thread isn't about global warming but is instead about the NYT.

Deflection is all they have and people are going with it.

They should consult fskimospy though, he's a real expert, had me discussing irrelevant bullshit for an hour and then pretended like he didn't even try to deflect.
 
i love how this thread isn't about global warming but is instead about the NYT.

I mean what else is there to say about climate change though? The premise of the thread turned out to be inaccurate so now it's DSF's time to declare the New York Times to be terrible because that's what conservative media told him.
 
It is indeed fake news....lol. It wasn't a leaked report as reported...as it's been in the public realm for months. And the NYT's reason why they published the "leaked" report (for fear Trump would suppress it) is pure unadulterated horseshit.

The NYT has become a fucking tabloid.

Yes, the NYT is a tabloid.

please pass the pipe, bro.
 
Yes, the NYT is a tabloid.

please pass the pipe, bro.
Reporter falsely indicates they've received a leaked report stating the reason it was "leaked" was because people were worried Trump would deep-six it. How embarrassing it must be to have the climate scientists involved who authored the report call you out on your shoddy reporting. False narrative is false narrative....with horrible fact checking to boot! Then you have Comey under oath exposing their bullshit narrative regarding Russia as well. But if you like this kind of reporting...go for it...I hear they're running a 2 for 1 subscription special with the National Enquirer!
 
The GOP is an extremist group. Out of the 181 countries that signed Paris, do the radicalized GOP base think all those governments that got on board are 'leftists' and none of them represent the right wing party of their country? Denying MMGW is no different than saying you believe in the Easter Bunny, total detachment from reality. Bonus points to those that have zero relevant education and have just got on board due to partisan sheep-hood or reading too many whacko pseudo-science blogs on the issue.
 
Reporter falsely indicates they've received a leaked report stating the reason it was "leaked" was because people were worried Trump would deep-six it. How embarrassing it must be to have the climate scientists involved who authored the report call you out on your shoddy reporting. False narrative is false narrative....with horrible fact checking to boot! Then you have Comey under oath exposing their bullshit narrative regarding Russia as well. But if you like this kind of reporting...go for it...I hear they're running a 2 for 1 subscription special with the National Enquirer!

Lol, you are trying so hard. I know conservative media tells you to hate the New York Times but if you take a step back and read it objectively you'll quickly understand why it has won more Pulitzer Prizes than any other newspaper. It's an excellent paper, but of course it makes mistakes from time to time. It's odd that I never see you so enraged by mistakes that conservative media make, especially considering their frequency and in some cases, transparent dishonesty. Can you explain why?

Also, Comey disputing one of their stories is kind of meaningless. They reported what well placed sources in the administration told them and specified that their story was based on these sources. If those sources turn out to be wrong, then they're wrong. Nothing particularly interesting there.
 
Forever curious...what sacred assumptions do you believe I hold dear?
My point wasn't that you have sacred assumptions. I was saying that my deepest wish and dreams that mine were true didn't make them happen for me. I couldn't hold on to then try as I did. I did in the end, however, discover something else different than I expected, but which passes all tests.
 
Reporter falsely indicates they've received a leaked report stating the reason it was "leaked" was because people were worried Trump would deep-six it. How embarrassing it must be to have the climate scientists involved who authored the report call you out on your shoddy reporting. False narrative is false narrative....with horrible fact checking to boot! Then you have Comey under oath exposing their bullshit narrative regarding Russia as well. But if you like this kind of reporting...go for it...I hear they're running a 2 for 1 subscription special with the National Enquirer!
Well, it's not quite up to the standards of Trump's Real News, but they do their best.
 
Reporter falsely indicates they've received a leaked report stating the reason it was "leaked" was because people were worried Trump would deep-six it. How embarrassing it must be to have the climate scientists involved who authored the report call you out on your shoddy reporting. False narrative is false narrative....with horrible fact checking to boot! Then you have Comey under oath exposing their bullshit narrative regarding Russia as well. But if you like this kind of reporting...go for it...I hear they're running a 2 for 1 subscription special with the National Enquirer!

So, uhh, what do you think about the report itself? Fake News? False narrative?

And what will our Dear Leader & his minions do with it other than blow it out their ass?
 
Given that the only thing being attacked by our resident "conservatives" is the NY times for initially saying the document was leaked when it was available to the public. I guess they are accepting of the conclusions actually reached in the document.
 
Given that the only thing being attacked by our resident "conservatives" is the NY times for initially saying the document was leaked when it was available to the public. I guess they are accepting of the conclusions actually reached in the document.

I doubt they care about the document itself, this is a chance to attack their imagined tribal enemy. That's what they care about.
 
Even the Washington Post called the New York Times on their story and the Times belatedly issued a "correction" also know as "we fucked up because we didn't check the story because it fit into our belief system"
 
Back
Top