It's based on the English constitution so yeah, i think i do.
No, it's not. It has also undergone centuries of refinement and understanding.
Note, it's not based on the beloved patriot constitution which is non exiastant or the Indian constitution which is non existant.
Of course they have volountarily accepted the constitution of the comonwealth.
They abolished the monarchy. They shit upon the Queen. That doesn't seem like embracing the UK.
I'm not even sure how you can make a claim that their constitutions embraced that of the inbred Queen's constitution. They have the concept of judicial review, which is an interpretation from the US Constitution. The UK system is about parliamentary supremacy. They are very different models. Like most countries, they probably adopted from many sources and created their own ideas as well.
Yes, after we left they embraced our constitution...
Saying that they left is putting it lightly. The UK was beaten and subdued by third-world civilians all over the world! It's one of the greatest stories of humanity - evil being denied. A half-naked, skinny, old, and sickly man basically subdued a supposed mighty Empire.
I suppose you hate them over doing that though, don't you?
Now sod off until you have anything worth while to add.
I think correcting you is something that is worthwhile to add.