- Jan 4, 2005
- 2,184
- 0
- 0
I have to say, I had to spend $1800 to get it, but the Sandy Bridge upgrade (see sig) is the first time I've spent that kind of money and not had elements of disappointment in the build. This is the first machine I've done where I have everything fully balanced, there are no significant I/O bottlenecks, and the system literally does everything I want without a hiccup. (Photoshop opens in 2 sec.! Framemaker 10, with 800 fonts installed - a stitch more than two seconds! On my quad-core i5 laptop from work, the same thing takes 30 seconds!)
I didn't even have to spend that much cash to get this. I'm not a serious gamer so I won't be running SLI, and 30-inch monitors hurt my neck esp. in portrait mode.
To really build a fully responsive system you need a reliable SSD. Period. Without it the remaining $1500 I would have spent still would have left me with significant I/O bottlenecks in my OS. The SSD is what tied the whole system together. One of the guys (I think Edrick) told me I was stupid if I bought an i7-950. I have to admit - he was right. Running at 4.7 GHz, IBT Standard stable, is completely ridiculous. A 42% OC is the best I've ever achieved, and it wasn't really that hard. (I hit a stable 3.71 GHz on an Intel 65nm E6750, which really wasn't bad at all.)
Even memory overclocking, with the right RAM, is now shamefully straightforward. Intel took all the rocket science out of OCing, but at least they gave us cheap K chips to play with. All in all this turned out to be the machine of my dreams (knock on wood). At some point I may make an effort to reseat my HSF and that was by far the hardest part of the build (temps are average 36-38-39-38 idle, OS running) but other than that this thing is just creamy soft.
I think the last time I was that satisfied was when I built a 286-20 with 8 MB of RAM to run Windows 3.0. That thing lasted me almost five years, running NetWare afterwards.
I didn't even have to spend that much cash to get this. I'm not a serious gamer so I won't be running SLI, and 30-inch monitors hurt my neck esp. in portrait mode.
To really build a fully responsive system you need a reliable SSD. Period. Without it the remaining $1500 I would have spent still would have left me with significant I/O bottlenecks in my OS. The SSD is what tied the whole system together. One of the guys (I think Edrick) told me I was stupid if I bought an i7-950. I have to admit - he was right. Running at 4.7 GHz, IBT Standard stable, is completely ridiculous. A 42% OC is the best I've ever achieved, and it wasn't really that hard. (I hit a stable 3.71 GHz on an Intel 65nm E6750, which really wasn't bad at all.)
Even memory overclocking, with the right RAM, is now shamefully straightforward. Intel took all the rocket science out of OCing, but at least they gave us cheap K chips to play with. All in all this turned out to be the machine of my dreams (knock on wood). At some point I may make an effort to reseat my HSF and that was by far the hardest part of the build (temps are average 36-38-39-38 idle, OS running) but other than that this thing is just creamy soft.
I think the last time I was that satisfied was when I built a 286-20 with 8 MB of RAM to run Windows 3.0. That thing lasted me almost five years, running NetWare afterwards.
