SB Stats 1/29/06

Spacehead

Lifer
Jun 2, 2002
13,067
9,858
136
Last Updated 2006-01-29 23:10:03 EST


Yesterday
Members on team: 383
Returned results yesterday: 32 (8.4%)
Members in Top 10: 1
Members in Top 25: 1
Top producer: shmapty (5.230 T cEMs)
Highest climber: strates (130 spots)

Yesterday's Milestones
shmapty crossed 726 T cEMs
WX crossed 66 T cEMs
erikvw crossed 36 T cEMs
pcjjman crossed 12 T cEMs
raysun2be crossed 5 T cEMs
diegoalcatraz crossed 5 T cEMs




Overall
1 TeamPrimeRib 14.652 P
2 Dutch_Power_Cows 6.900 P
3 TeamRetro 6.589 P
4 Anandtech 6.397 P
5 FreeDC 4.026 P

Last 24 Hours
1 Dutch_Power_Cows 16.003 T
2 TeamPrimeRib 13.623 T
3 TeamRetro 9.063 T
4 Anandtech 8.827 T
5 FreeDC 7.061 T

Overall
1 spacom 1.828 P
2 DVNT1 1.802 P
3 sturle 1.291 P
4 maefly 1.225 P
5 wizbones 1.078 P

Last 24 Hours
1 ML 7.722 T
2 shmapty 5.230 T
3 birdman2584 4.152 T
4 unionpacific59 2.480 T
5 xdanaux 2.263 T



Last 24 Hours _____ Name
cEMs _____
5.230 T _____ shmapty
415.418 G _____ OberonBob
350.865 G _____ WX
336.556 G _____ raysun2be
291.426 G _____ tolsen
220.851 G _____ TeAmDeception
206.240 G _____ Memnoch
177.889 G _____ Esquire
145.222 G _____ Tetsuo316
132.733 G _____ pcjjman
131.240 G _____ silverpig
122.741 G _____ macgyver
122.239 G _____ sv2003
116.483 G _____ diegoalcatraz
97.745 G _____ strates
82.246 G _____ BOLt11
75.245 G _____ ssvegeta1010
65.489 G _____ diapickle
53.998 G _____ BigJames
50.993 G _____ NicColt
50.493 G _____ CyberWire
49.497 G _____ erikvw
47.496 G _____ slowbones
45.242 G _____ allio
41.248 G _____ Coquito
40.746 G _____ DnetMHZ
35.495 G _____ TwilightZone77
33.748 G _____ EvilWobbles
24.247 G _____ WireX
18.999 G _____ GhettoFob
14.499 G _____ SinfulWeeper
 

shmapty

Member
Jan 12, 2006
25
0
0
thanks for the stats Spacehead.

out of curiosity, where do you and ssvegeta1010 get the raw numbers for these statistics?
 

RaySun2Be

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
16,565
6
71
Congrats! to the Milestone Makers! :D

Thanks for the stats, Spacehead! :D

my main SOB cruncher was down most of yesterday. Got the 2.4Ghz CPU in, installed, nothing. Put the 1.6Ghz back in, updated to the latest bios, reinstalled the 2.4ghz, nothing.
Brought in my P4 MB, will try to see if it works with that. But I suspect I was sold a bad CPU. :(
 

shmapty

Member
Jan 12, 2006
25
0
0
Got the 2.4Ghz CPU in, installed, nothing. Put the 1.6Ghz back in, updated to the latest bios, reinstalled the 2.4ghz, nothing.

That's too bad. is the 2.4 chip a "C" or higher processor/stepping? maybe there's an
incompatibility with mobos with narrower front-side bus?
 

RaySun2Be

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
16,565
6
71
It's supposed to be compatible with my MB. it's supposed to be a P4, 2.4Ghz, 512K L2, 400 FSB CPU. Which the Intel D845BG MB supports, from BIOS version P04 on.

The good news is the CPU isn't bad, as it works in my Matsonic MS9337C MB. (I'm posting from it now) :)

So there may be an issue with the Intel board. :(

There's a few more things I'm going to try before I give up on the Intel MB.
 

ssvegeta1010

Platinum Member
Nov 13, 2004
2,192
0
0
Thanks a ton for doing the stats! Ill try and get more computer access and hopefully will be back around consistently at least before March.
 

RaySun2Be

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
16,565
6
71
Originally posted by: ssvegeta1010
Thanks a ton for doing the stats! Ill try and get more computer access and hopefully will be back around consistently at least before March.


No problems, ssvegeta1010! Do what you need to do. :)

Well, The good news is that the CPU is good. Fired up fine in my Matsonic MB. Will not fire up, beep, or anything else in the Intel. :(

When I get a chance, I'm going to scrape off the thermal paste and double check the CPU. I'm wondering if they sent me a 533FSB proc instead of the 400FSB. That's the only difference between the 2. The Matsonic supports 533fsb, the Intel only the 400FSB.
 

shmapty

Member
Jan 12, 2006
25
0
0
SOB stats from GeoffS

Does anybody else see inconsistencies between tb-stats and the primary SoB stats pages?
For example, in the last 24 hours, AgafonovKY's (TSC) work rate at seventeenorbust.com
is 8.559 M cEMs/sec (~740 G cEMs/day), but is 7.492 T cEMs/day at tbstats.

on Jan 29, ML (DPC) is ranked top (7.722 T cEMs/day) at tbstats, but according to
seventeenorbust.com, he only actually computed 4 M cEMs/sec (~345 G cEMs/day)

GeoffS has a great interface. I guess I'm just having trouble understanding how some of
the numbers are generated. Thanks.
 

Coquito

Diamond Member
Nov 30, 2003
8,559
1
0
Different periods of time. A 24hr cycle might start at 5am for some, midnight for others.
 

GeoffS

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
11,583
0
71
Originally posted by: shmapty
SOB stats from GeoffS

Does anybody else see inconsistencies between tb-stats and the primary SoB stats pages?
For example, in the last 24 hours, AgafonovKY's (TSC) work rate at seventeenorbust.com
is 8.559 M cEMs/sec (~740 G cEMs/day), but is 7.492 T cEMs/day at tbstats.

on Jan 29, ML (DPC) is ranked top (7.722 T cEMs/day) at tbstats, but according to
seventeenorbust.com, he only actually computed 4 M cEMs/sec (~345 G cEMs/day)

GeoffS has a great interface. I guess I'm just having trouble understanding how some of
the numbers are generated. Thanks.

I probably need to revisit those stats and check them out... they were, I think, the 2nd set of stats that I did after D2OL and they probably need an overhaul to catch them up to the changes I made as I brought on new projects. I know they get a bit squirrely if there isn't an update file at the time I go out to look for one. Hoping to get some down time soon to work on getting a BOINC stats interface up and running, to update the user interface a bit, experiment with running the database off a server at my home, but the pages off a hosted service (I want to keep the lifetime stats, but can't affort to pay for a hosted service for that much data), and make the update process more reliable... in my spare time! lol :p
 

shmapty

Member
Jan 12, 2006
25
0
0
Originally posted by: Coquito
Different periods of time. A 24hr cycle might start at 5am for some, midnight for others.

You're right, but the discrepancy that I think I see is far too large of a gap. the ML user,
for example, submitted no work for several days (according to SoB) but somehow became
the #1 contributor.
 

shmapty

Member
Jan 12, 2006
25
0
0
Originally posted by: GeoffS

experiment with running the database off a server at my home, but the pages off a hosted service (I want to keep the lifetime stats, but can't affort to pay for a hosted service for that much data), and make the update process more reliable... in my spare time! lol :p

I agree. The lifetime stats that you're maintaining are very nice. Your work is much
appreciated here.

My guess is that the SoB team uses something like rrdtool which maintains a fixed size
db file per resource (user, team, etc) at the expense of losing the kind of granularity
that you have.
 

GeoffS

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
11,583
0
71
Originally posted by: shmapty
Originally posted by: Coquito
Different periods of time. A 24hr cycle might start at 5am for some, midnight for others.

You're right, but the discrepancy that I think I see is far too large of a gap. the ML user,
for example, submitted no work for several days (according to SoB) but somehow became
the #1 contributor.

That, I think, is one of the holes I have to plug... hard to explain the details, but generally if a user doesn't appear in my yesterday or previous-day tables, the software treats the user as a new user... same if they change their name... that was reworked in some of the newer stats pages and the change didn't get replicated down to the SoB stats. :eek:
 

BOLt

Diamond Member
Dec 11, 2004
7,380
0
0
I've started DIMES in addition to SoB. I've heard that the former does not have a negative effect on the latter, so I went ahead and took the plunge with DIMES.

I'm running SoB on one of the 18 FX-57 Alienware computers in the university gaming lab. If it stays crunching for more than a few hours (it stopped for some reason on my other attempts), I'll recruit more machines. If you take a look at my stats, you'll notice the huge jump. That's two of those Alienware rigs plus mine. When it falls off by about 50%, that's one of the machines quitting the program for some reason. The second drop is the other quitting. As you can see, it's a pretty major boost. Hopefully I can eventually run it on like 5 or 6 of them. I hope the university officials don't mind...
 

Spacehead

Lifer
Jun 2, 2002
13,067
9,858
136
Originally posted by: BOLt

I'm running SoB on one of the 18 FX-57 Alienware computers in the university gaming lab.
I hope the university officials don't mind...
I hope you have written permission.

 

BOLt

Diamond Member
Dec 11, 2004
7,380
0
0
Originally posted by: Spacehead
Originally posted by: BOLt

I'm running SoB on one of the 18 FX-57 Alienware computers in the university gaming lab.
I hope the university officials don't mind...
I hope you have written permission.

Haha, moot point. Looks like the machines are set up to re-image every few hours. Wouldn't be worth the time to keep reloading it. I don't even wanna try running it as a service on those computers because of all of the security they put on it.

Oh well. Just a shame to see all of that computing power wasted like that.