- Jul 17, 2004
- 5,122
- 52
- 91
Originally posted by: BrownTown
well the bankruptcy judge could void all their union contracts so they don't have to pay absurd amounts of money for labor and then maybe they will be successful again...
Originally posted by: BrownTown
well the bankruptcy judge could void all their union contracts so they don't have to pay absurd amounts of money for labor and then maybe they will be successful again...
Originally posted by: dartworth
Originally posted by: BrownTown
well the bankruptcy judge could void all their union contracts so they don't have to pay absurd amounts of money for labor and then maybe they will be successful again...
they don't pay their workers "absurd" amounts of money...
Originally posted by: dartworth
Originally posted by: BrownTown
well the bankruptcy judge could void all their union contracts so they don't have to pay absurd amounts of money for labor and then maybe they will be successful again...
they don't pay their workers "absurd" amounts of money...
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: dartworth
Originally posted by: BrownTown
well the bankruptcy judge could void all their union contracts so they don't have to pay absurd amounts of money for labor and then maybe they will be successful again...
they don't pay their workers "absurd" amounts of money...
double what toyota pays down the street isn't absurd?
Originally posted by: dartworth
Originally posted by: BrownTown
well the bankruptcy judge could void all their union contracts so they don't have to pay absurd amounts of money for labor and then maybe they will be successful again...
they don't pay their workers "absurd" amounts of money...
Originally posted by: dartworth
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: dartworth
Originally posted by: BrownTown
well the bankruptcy judge could void all their union contracts so they don't have to pay absurd amounts of money for labor and then maybe they will be successful again...
they don't pay their workers "absurd" amounts of money...
double what toyota pays down the street isn't absurd?
you need to check your facts...
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
Originally posted by: dartworth
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: dartworth
Originally posted by: BrownTown
well the bankruptcy judge could void all their union contracts so they don't have to pay absurd amounts of money for labor and then maybe they will be successful again...
they don't pay their workers "absurd" amounts of money...
double what toyota pays down the street isn't absurd?
you need to check your facts...
IIRC, they get something like $30/hour not including benefits (though new hires are much lower).
$30/hour is 60k/year for "unskilled" labor.
i'm not putting anyone down.. but that's better than many "skilled" out of college jobs (ie, engineers start, on average, around 50k-ish)
Originally posted by: dartworth
Originally posted by: BrownTown
well the bankruptcy judge could void all their union contracts so they don't have to pay absurd amounts of money for labor and then maybe they will be successful again...
they don't pay their workers "absurd" amounts of money...
Originally posted by: ElFenix
oh sorry it was $48 total benefits per hour at toyota and $74 at GM. no idea if that considers GM's job bank. if it doesn't, then the GM number is ever worse in comparison to toyota. the latest contract might have helped that difference a bit but that's like letting someone have just enough air that they choke even more slowly.
Originally posted by: maddogchen
you guys are wrong in looking at the wages per hour. that is not what is killing GM, its the pensions they are still paying out.
From blogspot.com?
No automaker has ever emerged from bankruptcy. What do you feel would make this situation different? Why would GM emerge from bankruptcy when others didn't.Originally posted by: Jeeebus
they would file under Chapter 11, stock trading would freeze, they would be allowed to reject certain leases/contracts, unsecured debt would be traded, they'll re-emerge in a year or two and stock will begin trading again (new stock... old stock vanishes into the void, as well as all stockholders).
It's health care, not pensions. It's been health care for the longest time.Originally posted by: maddogchen
you guys are wrong in looking at the wages per hour. that is not what is killing GM, its the pensions they are still paying out.
Originally posted by: boomerang
It's health care, not pensions. It's been health care for the longest time.Originally posted by: maddogchen
you guys are wrong in looking at the wages per hour. that is not what is killing GM, its the pensions they are still paying out.
Pensions are relatively easy to fund and very easy to plan for.
Originally posted by: boomerang
No automaker has ever emerged from bankruptcy. What do you feel would make this situation different? Why would GM emerge from bankruptcy when others didn't.Originally posted by: Jeeebus
they would file under Chapter 11, stock trading would freeze, they would be allowed to reject certain leases/contracts, unsecured debt would be traded, they'll re-emerge in a year or two and stock will begin trading again (new stock... old stock vanishes into the void, as well as all stockholders).
Let me sum it up this way, would you buy a car from a bankrupt company and if so, why?
