sandorski
No Lifer
- Oct 10, 1999
- 70,101
- 5,640
- 126
If no one has a God detector, how you know that a "God" doesn't exist?
Burden of Proof.
Can you answer my question?
If no one has a God detector, how you know that a "God" doesn't exist?
That circle you're running in is getting smaller and smaller.
Burden of Proof.
Can you answer my question?
Why don't you go find out if their interpretation is correct, and come tell me.
To find out which interpretation is correct, go read it yourself, and come back, and talk. There are a gazillion copies of the Bible out here. Stop being lazy.
Has science detected God yet via the scientific method?
I'm asking you. What was the result of your investigation of their interpretations?
I'm not lazy, I'm disinterested. You're the believer, so I figured this would be something you would have considered already.
I will if you let me know what kind/type of proof would be sufficent enough for you so that I could know where to start.
The world is filled with invisible pink unicorns. They are dancing on top of your monitor right now.
They're just not "detectable by the scientific method".
What is Proof to you?
How do you know "God" exists?
Would a book claiming to be 2000 years old be sufficient?Show me a ~2000 year old book that says it's true and then I'll believe it.
To find out which interpretation is correct, go read it yourself, and come back, and talk. There are a gazillion copies of the Bible out here. Stop being lazy.
I don't know anything about them nor their interpretation and frankly am "disinterested" in it as well, to be honest. All sarcasm aside.
You're wrong. I didn't consider it.
Show me a ~2000 year old book that says it's true and then I'll believe it.
I guess I'm mostly wondering why you think you got it right (assuming you have), the interpretation that is. Again, I'm assuming there is a "correct" interpretation, or at least a mostly correct one, since there appears to be a unique interpretation out there for each of those "gazillion" Bibles.
That's why I asked you about your opinion on the Westboro Baptist Church (the "God Hates Fags" church). You said I was lazy for not looking into it, but I'm just wondering how extensive your quest/efforts have been in discovering the "right" interpretation. Considering it's your personal eternity you're gambling with, which has got to be a helluva lot longer than your existence here on earth, I would think that search would continue for life. Have you already stopped looking? Have you settled into a permanent interpretation?
(snip)
I see you guys like talking Science here are words from a woman 2000 years ago . It gives me goosebumps The science thats in here . Now Imagine A system entering the event horizon of a black whole Pretty much what one would expect to see in science isn't it . Matter Aeon . Also note The soul and the spirit are in the same place , Its as I have told you many times SOUL= Flesh . The Spirit Is the Spirit and it doesn't belong exclusively to you . It is Christ or god in all men. Why this things are hidden is pretty easy to understand if your on the A team . If your a monkey it may be beyond your capacity to comprehend .
Being closer related to the Chimp than a Monkey, I suppose I may be more able to comprehend your attempt to ordain 'Mary's' gospel as authoritative. Or even that the analogy can be construed as you proclaim...
My questions would be: Since what you listed is not considered inspired by God, apparently, what value do you assign to it? Had every invitee attend the various settings to discuss these issues do you speculate on the outcome had they done so and do you think it was the will of God that they didn't all attend... Especially as it relates to the Divinity of Jesus from the First (Inspired?) Meeting in Nicaea given Your 'Mary' gospel seems to refer to Jesus as sorta special to her and the apostles. And finally, Since you assign the Spirit sorta on loan from God or at least shared, do you think folks having such might be preordained to accept as truth the writings of the bible (and the non biblical writings if you want) than those whose Spirit is corrupted by the reality they see about them?
As an after thought, are your goose bumps similar to Chris Mathews' 'tingling' up his leg over Obama? I get goose bumps when I'm cold so I'm trying to relate to your experience.
You want to debate something like this you best bring alot more than this to the Table . I suppose the Gosphel of peter is bogus also . PAUL was never an Apostle its a HRCC lie . Paul also goes against Christ own words . None can Attain Heaven least it come threw me . THE Paul Like another man in history was saved by the Holy spirit According to paul . Christ and The Spirit are opposing each other here . I think not ROME lied.
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/sbrandt/nicea.htm ROME the evil emperior had alot more to do with the Church and what went into the New testiment than you can imagine . The council was set up in Roman forum type. What went in and what didn't go in . Now this info is small comparred to what you can attain from any catholic school . In first grade the vary first religion lessons we recieved were about the Semerians . Imagine that . They also taught us this was were the eden was located. You going to come to a gun fight with a knife don't waste my time
I will lay wages you are not RH negitive blood . This blood type is the only type that doesn't contain Rhesus monkey dna. So you stand corrected
You know about Enoch write did you know it to was in the Torah but removed it was in the Roman bible (Jersulem Bible) also removed . Bless the works and wonders of man . It still to this day is in one bible . The Ethiopic version does how ever. The book of jjude quotes Enoch and that is good enough for me . Enoch was a decendent of cain is that not ass stomping?
Now back to the Rhesus Monkey blood 85% of all humans have . I will start you on the easy things that are easily understood by none monkeys . I know you will have a hard time wrapping your tail around this but do try .
http://www.lavistachurchofchrist.org/LVSermons/BookOfEnoch.htm
In a debate like this I always help my opponent just to even things up a bit .
Nope! I'm O+ and I'm closer related to the Chimp and Bonobo than to you, apparently. Well... according to the evolutionary biologists that I consulted when I found I really liked chimp food.
Assuming Noah and Mrs Noah are related to Adam, Eve and the boys... through Grandpa Enoch... hmmm.... Did Eve mess with Cain or did he find a cute monkey? Anyhow, I don't know much about those books Moses wrote or what Enoch wrote but I did see the movie with Chuck Heston being Moses if that counts and the script writer must have left that bit about Enoch liking monkeys out... or I was after pop corn when it was discussed.
Well, it is nice of you to provide help to this intellectually starved ape. I don't seem to have a tail so I'm hard pressed to consider myself competent to sail about in your tree.