Save water and Utilities reward you with huge water fee hikes

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DucatiMonster696

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2009
4,269
1
71
Several Arizona communities have competing private water companies. The model still doesn't account for the cost of the water as the utilities don't have to replace the water they pump. Long term groundwater depletion continues with no cost to current users.

Care to provide some additional information and citation?

In addition the additional costs seen in Las Vegas in this instance stem not from increased water usage, as growth has slowed to a crawl, but instead from maintenance of the entire water delivery infrastructure itself which is being passed onto businesses but not residents despite a drop in demand via the slowed population growth.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,412
32,996
136
Care to provide some additional information and citation?
The one I'm most familiar with is Sierra Vista, AZ, population ~45,000 plus maybe another 15,000 in its unincorporated suburbs. The city and adjacent communities are serviced by private water utilities. Most (all?) were established by land developers as the area grew. Some of the water companies are Bella Vista, Arizona Water, and Huachuca Water.
 

DucatiMonster696

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2009
4,269
1
71
The one I'm most familiar with is Sierra Vista, AZ, population ~45,000 plus maybe another 15,000 in its unincorporated suburbs. The city and adjacent communities are serviced by private water utilities. Most (all?) were established by land developers as the area grew. Some of the water companies are Bella Vista, Arizona Water, and Huachuca Water.

So far I've yet to find any recent info on the claims you've made. Can you provide any substantial links to back up your post?

There is however a ton of information available in relation to the state government and water providers working toward solutions for the water issues they face which are specific to their state along with the laws in play but none of it relates to your claim of wantonly reckless waste by private water providers or that there are no ongoing attempts made to reclaim and recharge local water supplies.

http://www.azwater.gov/azdwr/default.aspx
 
Last edited:

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally Posted by dmcowen674
What would you have the bar do, charge $20 for a glass of beer?

Providing water costs money. Who do you propose should pay for it and why?

So only the rich could afford a beer in Las Vegas, gotcha.

That's pretty much the whole country will be based on your thinking.

When us peasants are all gone who is going to man the bar and serve you 1%ers?
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
The size of the water meter is supposed to be based on how much water the building uses. The solution is to get a smaller meter
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
Water IMO is going to be THE most critical commodity over the next century. Energy/Oil are important, but the clean water supply is dwindling rapidly while the world's population expands rapidly. Couple that with the fact that a lot of water usage is not really optional (drinking water), and you see how big of a problem it will be.

So only the rich could afford a beer in Las Vegas, gotcha.

You did not answer his question. Who should pay for the real cost of water, and why?
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Water IMO is going to be THE most critical commodity over the next century. Energy/Oil are important, but the clean water supply is dwindling rapidly while the world's population expands rapidly. Couple that with the fact that a lot of water usage is not really optional (drinking water), and you see how big of a problem it will be.



You did not answer his question. Who should pay for the real cost of water, and why?

I did answer the question, apparently $20 for a beer ought to cover it.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,412
32,996
136
So far I've yet to find any recent info on the claims you've made. Can you provide any substantial links to back up your post?

There is however a ton of information available in relation to the state government and water providers working toward solutions for the water issues they face which are specific to their state along with the laws in play but none of it relates to your claim of wantonly reckless waste by private water providers or that there are no ongoing attempts made to reclaim and recharge local water supplies.

http://www.azwater.gov/azdwr/default.aspx

Huh? I made no claim of wanton or reckless waste. I stated that the private companies do not have fee structures that reflect the actual cost of providing sustainable water supplies and that current rates do not reflect the long term impacts of groundwater depletion.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
Huh? I made no claim of wanton or reckless waste. I stated that the private companies do not have fee structures that reflect the actual cost of providing sustainable water supplies and that current rates do not reflect the long term impacts of groundwater depletion.

Neither do public entities. Nobody is paying for the true cost of sustainable water in the US. We're just lucky that for the most part there is enough fresh water in the US to support the population. That's not going to be the case much longer, especially if the major drought cycle we're in continues.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
What the fuck? What kind of brain damaged crackhead came up with this stupid idea? What next, the electric company sets its charges based on your shoe size?

We rarely agree, but we do on this issue.

The fee structure is designed to shelter high consumption users (giant hotels/casinos/golf courses) by putting the cost off onto low usage customers, at least in part. Those swimming pools, giant fountains & acres of greenery use up an enormous amount of water.

Nevada politics, and this is obviously political, always favor the casinos & other entertainment venues. Always. That's where the money comes from.

It's just another way to externalize the cost of doing business.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Neither do public entities. Nobody is paying for the true cost of sustainable water in the US. We're just lucky that for the most part there is enough fresh water in the US to support the population. That's not going to be the case much longer, especially if the major drought cycle we're in continues.

"Few" is the term you want, rather than "nobody". Denver's water is collected at high altitude from snowmelt, a renewable resource, as is that of many other cities in the region. Riverine water for agriculture is much the same. You are correct wrt water drawn from subterranean aquifers.
 

zanejohnson

Diamond Member
Nov 29, 2002
7,054
17
81
how the fuck are you people thinking water is going to run low... lol... is evaporation coming to an end ROFL...

this thread is so ridiculous...

the price of water SHOULD ONLY RISE WITH INFLATION.

the amount of water on this planet does not change.
 

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
We have the ability to build a pipeline system for fossil fuels spanning North America, imagine if we build a pipeline/aqueduct system to bring water from places that have excess to places that don't have enough.


north_america_pipelines_map.jpg






Couldn't cost more than a 2 trillion dollar war now;)
 

Doppel

Lifer
Feb 5, 2011
13,306
3
0
Water may be a problem in parts of the world, but not in the US. Now, Nevada is a dessert so who cares about them but most of the US is quite close to lakes and desalination of sea water provides a lot of water to others. Water will be an increasing challenge but I have no fear at all that in anybody's lifetime reading this the US is going to face a shortage of drinking water.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
how the fuck are you people thinking water is going to run low... lol... is evaporation coming to an end ROFL...

this thread is so ridiculous...

the price of water SHOULD ONLY RISE WITH INFLATION.

the amount of water on this planet does not change.

The issue is fresh water, delivered to your tap in a safe, consistent & palatable form. Drinking water isn't just "water", at all, but a highly processed commercial commodity, free of pathogens & most pollutants. Modern American drinking water is a triumph of science & technology-

http://www.denverwater.org/WaterQuality/

Well, some of it, anyway...
 

CallMeJoe

Diamond Member
Jul 30, 2004
6,938
5
81
how the fuck are you people thinking water is going to run low... lol... is evaporation coming to an end ROFL...
this thread is so ridiculous...
the price of water SHOULD ONLY RISE WITH INFLATION.
the amount of water on this planet does not change.
Do some reading on aquifers and their depletion. Not all people are supplied from renewable surface waters.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
I was reading something not too long ago about the advances in solar power technologies and projections that we could soon be entering an age of abundance of energy, and along with that comes an over-abundance of fresh water.

Just not today unfortunately.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
OK folks

It's not just Vegas. Water Thug Utilities are using the same language and excuse throughout the country.

Save water and get penalized and screwed for doing so.

7-10-2012

http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20120710/news/707109962

Buffalo Grove OKs 65 percent rate hike



On Monday, the village board approved a 35 percent increase in the rates beginning in January and a 30 percent increase the following year.

Water consumption is down due to such factors as energy efficient appliances.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,019
14,424
146
A few years ago, California passed a law requiring all residential properties to be on metered water service...so, a couple of years, we switched from a flat monthly rate for our water based on (a) size of water connection and (b) lot size, to water charged by the hundred gallons...PLUS a monthly "connection fee" that's based on (a) size of water connection and (b) lot size.

People started cutting back on how much water they used because of the higher costs...of course, that meant the city wasn't "selling as much water," so they recently announced an increase in the charge for water...
 

sao123

Lifer
May 27, 2002
12,653
205
106
Because the user which required the greater capacity may not use that greater capacity. The infrastructure to provide that capacity is a sunk cost to the utility. To recoup the cost of providing capacity the utility is charging a fee based on that capacity in addition to a charge for the water actually used.

If one buys a four seat car, one pays for the back seats even if one never uses them. It is the same idea here.


what a terrible analogy... sure you pay for the back seat... when you buy the car...

AKA when you pay your connect fee.

But other than paying for the car itself (a one time thing) You dont have to pay a continuing monthly fee just for the privilige of keeping your backseat... no you just pay for the gas you use.

This is more akin to paying a cable subscription service AND being charged for each program you watch.