SataII Raid- card recommendations?

marcuri

Junior Member
Nov 19, 2004
24
0
66
thinking about doing raid 5 with 3 hitachi 160 gig hard drives that support SATAII. anyone know what cards are out there that are *good* and do sata II?

thanks.
 

marcuri

Junior Member
Nov 19, 2004
24
0
66
also a site where i could get the card from or a price would be helpful as well.
 

Gannon

Senior member
Jul 29, 2004
527
0
0
SATA-II isn't going to buy you any more performance over a regular SATA card, most RAID 5 cards are currently PCI, I do not believe there are any low cost PCI-E cards yet.

(** Please note the prices are outdated)

Highpoint Tech RocketRAID 1640 - 4 channel, PCI, Software Only RAID 5, NO cache memory
US$ 88 from NewEgg

Promise FastTrak S150 SX4 - 4 channel, PCI, Hardware Assisted RAID 5 Processor, Cache slot (user to install, takes standard PC100/133 SDRAM modules)
US$ 170 from NewEgg

LSI Logic MegaRAID SATA 150-4 - 4 channel, 64-bit PCI, Hardware RAID 5, 64MB Cache
US$ 247 from NewEgg

Adaptec SATA RAID 2410SA - 4 channel, 64-bit PCI, Hardware RAID 5, 64MB Cache
US$ 325 from NewEgg

3Ware Escalade 8506-4LP - 4 channel, 64-bit PCI, Hardware RAID 5, 64MB Cache
US$ 329 from NewEgg


Which card you choose in the end depends on your budget. But I highly recommend you NOT to get the Highpoint Tech card because its a pure Software RAID 5 implementation and the performance will depend on your CPU (which isn't too nice if you plan to use the machine other than a pure file server). The LSI Logic card right now has the best price/performance ratio IMO. If you have a spare stick of PC100/133 RAM around the Promise card is also OK as its even cheaper (I myself uses it and has a RAID 5 array of 3x160GB HDDs at the moment).

64-bit PCI cards are backwards compatible with your normal 32-bit 33MHz PCI slots on almost all motherboards (and it will operate at 32-bit mode).
 

marcuri

Junior Member
Nov 19, 2004
24
0
66
thanks for the advice. however i thought the only time that SATAII *DID* give a preformance increase was in raid. i was probably mistaken.