Am I wrong in believing there is no benefit in going with SAS over SATA for the setup below?
I'm looking at upgrading a file server with a four drive RAID 10 set on a PERC 5/i controller. Leaning towards the Seagate ES.2 500GB drives. They come with the exact same specs outside of the interface but the SAS drive is $173 vs SATA for $90.
The differences I'm aware of between SAS and SATA is the queue depth and cable length. Sata allows 32 requests in the queue compared to 60k+ for SAS. The max I've seen in perfmon on the current three drive RAID 5 set is 24.
I'm looking at upgrading a file server with a four drive RAID 10 set on a PERC 5/i controller. Leaning towards the Seagate ES.2 500GB drives. They come with the exact same specs outside of the interface but the SAS drive is $173 vs SATA for $90.
The differences I'm aware of between SAS and SATA is the queue depth and cable length. Sata allows 32 requests in the queue compared to 60k+ for SAS. The max I've seen in perfmon on the current three drive RAID 5 set is 24.