Sarvis is a Democrat Ploy.

[Anarchist420]

[Link]

doesnt surprise me in the least since sarvis has said he was a moderate and has said he prefers more mainstream economics over Austrian economics. he also didnt seem very comfortable when i went to go see him answer questions from students at my alma mater. he didnt even have trouble getting on the ballot. and then dr. paul didnt endorse him either.

too fucking bad this didnt come out earlier because at least kucinelli isnt a fucking nixonian used car salesman. im considering voting for him now.

 

[Incorruptible]

I read your link and I checked the other article and this guy isn't a libertarian.

Reason interview, Sarvis explained that he was “not into the whole Austrian type, strongly libertarian economics,” preferring “more mainstream economics” instead. The candidate expanded on this during an oddly defensive interview with MSNBC’s Chuck Todd, in which he seemed put off not so much by “strongly libertarian economics” as by libertarian economics per se. As governor, Sarvis told Todd, he would be hesitant to cut taxes, unsure as to how he might “reduce spending,” and open to indulging the largest piece of federal social policy since 1965 by expanding Virginia’s Medicaid program.

This guy Sarvis and the people responsible for helping him get in are real pieces of shit. The guy isn't Libertarian and he is making Libertarians look bad.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/362690/sarvis-libertarian-nope-charles-c-w-cooke

 

[theeedude]

I don't see a problem. A PAC can endorse whoever they want with their money, or as Republicans call it "free speech."
If you don't like it, take it up with the Republican SCOTUS.

 

[Anarchist420]

This guy Sarvis and the people responsible for helping him get in are real pieces of shit. The guy isn't Libertarian and he is making Libertarians look bad. http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...rles-c-w-cooke

thanks man!