BaliBabyDoc
Lifer
- Jan 20, 2001
- 10,737
- 0
- 0
Latest news is that its a new type of coronavirus, so actually not really like pneumonia since that's bacterial (pneumococcus), although the end result of massive inflammation and damage to the lungs is pretty similar.
Actually it's almost exactly like a VIRAL pneumonia. My current clinical instructor, Division Chief of Pediatric Infectious Disease, is pretty worried. He's old as dirt, so when the fossils start to sweat you know there's trouble. Infectious Disease (ID) bigwigs (including my instructor) had a conference call last week. The problems as I believe Fausto1 noted:
1) New virus?
2) Uncertain mode(s) of transmission - some info out of Guangdong and HK implies it may be moving by airborne particles, water, and fomites (particles settle on an object and someone later has contact with the object).
3) Fatality rate of 3% is impressive . . . especially considering the ease with which the ailment spreads.
4) It is almost certainly viral so the only treatment is supportive care (food, fluids, rest, intubation if necessary).
5) Early symptomology is consistent with many community-acquired upper respiratory tract infections . . . but colds and the VAST majority of pneumonias RARELY kill otherwise healthy people . . . SARS apparently does not discriminate it takes the strong and the weak.
One perspective would be to compare it to VX exposure . . . the symptoms of a nonlethal and a lethal exposure are often difficult to discern . . . until you crump and die. Hence, EVERY exposure is treated like it is potentially fatal.
