[Sardonic]Israelis getting what they deserve[/Sardonic]

[Random Variable]

Front view of a pelvis imbedded with nails
Front view of an abdomen imbedded with nails
Side view of the neck and lower back imbedded with nails

 

[TheCoop]

Is this supposed to be funny somehow?

 

[Random Variable]

Originally posted by: TheCoop
Is this supposed to be funny somehow?

No.

 

[Moonbeam]

I think this is supposed to produce outrage that somebody is brutally murdered on one side of a conflict while ignoring the suffering on the other. Why not just list the numbers of dead on both sides?

 

[mrCide]

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think this is supposed to produce outrage that somebody is brutally murdered on one side of a conflict while ignoring the suffering on the other. Why not just list the numbers of dead on both sides?

but that would be.. *gasp*.. logical..

and what is it like 1500 palestinians vs 500 israelis?

 

[Orsorum]

Originally posted by: mrCide

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think this is supposed to produce outrage that somebody is brutally murdered on one side of a conflict while ignoring the suffering on the other. Why not just list the numbers of dead on both sides?

but that would be.. *gasp*.. logical..

and what is it like 1500 palestinians vs 500 israelis?

Any way you look at it, you can't blindly ignore one side of the conflict.

It begs the question, how do we stop all this?

 

[pyonir]

isn't there a thread already with the same title?

 

[pulse8]

Also, why try and be fancy? Why not just use the word 'sarcastic'?

Originally posted by: Vespasian

Originally posted by: TheCoop
Is this supposed to be funny somehow?

No.

Main Entry: sar·don·ic
Pronunciation: sär-'dä-nik
Function: adjective
Etymology: French sardonique, from Greek sardonios
Date: 1638
: disdainfully or skeptically humorous : derisively mocking <a sardonic comment> <his sardonic expression>

 

[zippy]

Originally posted by: mrCide

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think this is supposed to produce outrage that somebody is brutally murdered on one side of a conflict while ignoring the suffering on the other. Why not just list the numbers of dead on both sides?

but that would be.. *gasp*.. logical..

and what is it like 1500 palestinians vs 500 israelis?

How many of the Palestinians were killed because they were being used as a shield by terrorists and how many were killed at random?

 

[Moonbeam]

I don't know zippy, they all just looked dead.

 

[Colt45]

You guys should really just stop giving a sh!t.

 

[Moonbeam]

Oh no ya dont, Colt45. Can't fool me with that one. We care because we're better than you.

 

[rbhawcroft]

so, er are we supposed to give a sh*t about some dead israelies, they brought it on themselves just like the americans brought vietnam, militants and bin 'the joker' laden on themselves, if they are so dumb not to see it, then this is now the EU stance: If you die we dont give a sh*t, if you fight back and kill civilians then you will be heading for a life sentence at the ICC, cool isnt it?

 

[BrunoPuntzJones]

Why not just let em go at each other no holds barred instead of this tit for tat stuff?

 

[rbhawcroft]

well moonbeam you could just kick back, chill out, light up the bomg and try and pull some wretched ho.

 

[jlee]

Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones
Why not just let em go at each other no holds barred instead of this tit for tat stuff?

Because Israel would blow them away, no contest...

 

[ThePresence]

Originally posted by: mrCide

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think this is supposed to produce outrage that somebody is brutally murdered on one side of a conflict while ignoring the suffering on the other. Why not just list the numbers of dead on both sides?

but that would be.. *gasp*.. logical..

and what is it like 1500 palestinians vs 500 israelis?

So what? That'll teach 'em not to pick a fight with someone who can kick their collective @sses. But the sad thing is, it wont teach them. They'll continue to send their children to their deaths in crowded resturants and hotel lobbies untill they eradicate Israel.

 

[Random Variable]

Originally posted by: zippy

Originally posted by: mrCide

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I think this is supposed to produce outrage that somebody is brutally murdered on one side of a conflict while ignoring the suffering on the other. Why not just list the numbers of dead on both sides?

but that would be.. *gasp*.. logical..

and what is it like 1500 palestinians vs 500 israelis?

How many of the Palestinians were killed because they were being used as a shield by terrorists and how many were killed at random?

That number includes members of Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Al-Aqsa, Tanzim, etc.

Reuters, which keeps probably the most accurate numbers, says that at least 1,471 Palestinians and 566 Israelis have been killed.