Sapphire Radeon x850 XT running badly. worse than my old PCI(not pci-e) card. mind boggling.

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
Ok. Ima try to make this short. So I used to have this Nvidia GeForce fx5700 LE PCI card. i didnt have an agp slot at the time, so i could only use pci. it ran fine, but i needed a better comp for gaming. so i got a new mobo and proc, a p4 1.9 ghz, which did indeed have an agp slot, albeit 4x. ive heard it wasnt a big deal, and the mobo and proc were free from my friend, so hey. i also got a gig of pc133 ram, cause the mobo used SDRAM.

so, i had:
Intel Pentium 4 1.9 ghz
1 GB (2x512) pc133 SDRAM
120 BG hardrive
550W "A Power Supply". yes, as far as i can tell, the company is called 'A'. no i dont understand. maybe i shouldnt have gotten it, just because it was $28 :p
Sapphire Radeon x850 XT AGP

with my pci card, i could easily run games like Counterstrike CZ, Halo, AvP2, Tribes 2, Painkiller, and Americas Army at good settings at a good framerate. but, when i got into stuff like Riddick EFBB, hl2, and css, they only ran ok. and doom3 and the F.E.A.R. beta were pretty much out of the question.

so, i was savin up for a new gfx card, and i had a birthday and stuff, so i had a ton of cash... and i decided to blow it all on an x850, cause i expected the thing to eat these games whole with no problem. well hmph.

i get my x850 and put it in. the cd with the drivers refused to work, it kept complaining about needing standard VGA drivers before i could use it... the disk with the drivers... yeah...
so im like 'whatever' and i go to the ati site and i download the drivers, and the catalyst version 5.7 . i ran into some trouble during the installation. when it wanted me to reset the computer, i said yes, and then my computer stopped at the blue "windows shutting down" screen for like the 20 minutes i gave it. its not supposed to do that, so after that time it was safe to assume it wasnt going to shut down, so i was forced to hold down the power button. i started my computer again, and it seemed to have worked fine. the card was recognized, nothing seemed out of place, no error messages. after i install the catalyst control center, just for kicks, i try the disk, which still doesnt work. ive pretty much given up on the cd that came with it.

so i try to run the FEAR beta, to see what happens. it auto detects at good settings, 1024x760, everything on medium or max, and it runs at a great framerate. so, thats not bad. i try to run doom3... and at medium detail, 800x600, no AA, everything else high, it lagged a lot. if i was in a corridor with nothing happening, it would run fine. but if anything was going on, the framerate dropped, and battles were unplayable. so yeah, i was irked to say the least. i try hl2 , which at same settings (800x600, 6x AA, everything high but no shader detail) runs worse than before. i try CS CZ, and at same settings (everything high, 1920x1440) and after running it for a few minutes, the framerate deteriorated to way too much noticable lag, whereas with my fx5700 i got none at all, ever. wolfenstein still ran awesome, no trouble. Americas Army ran like crap with everything turned up (1600x1200 tho) and before, it ran great. We ran riddick So. thus begins the quest to find the problem

i messed around with catalyst control center, and eventually ended up turning off the catalyst AI and telling it to let the application decide for what it could, and i turned up the overdrive as much as it would go.

We first think it was a driver problem because of the trouble during the installation. so i uninstall the drivers and reinstall them, and this time it works. unfortunately, the games do not. the games still run badly, no change.

So, i let my friend take the wheel. i completely forgot that i had the old pci card in. we took out the old card and removed those drivers. still no change in performance. So, we uninstall the ati drivers again, use Driver Cleaner Pro to remove everything ATI and NVIDIA, and re-download and re-install the ati drivers.

We then played riddick, which ran awesome, at 1600x1200 everything at max settings at a good framerate. THATS more like it. but, we had to leave, so we shut down the computer and left. when i came back a while later, everything had returned to the way is was before the cleanup, and riddick was unplayable at the same settings as before.

so, we decided to juggle gfx cards. We took my x850 xt and replaced my friends Radeon 9600 xt, and tested it on his computer. he has a 3.0 ghz P4 with 8x agp, pc 3200 ram, and 300W PSU. We ran Doom3, HL2, Riddick, and FEAR at max settings while running fraps at never less than 40 fps. usually between 60 and 150. theres something weird about running HL2 with reflect world water effects on, with a giant lake, at 100 fps. so yeah. thats how the x850 is SUPPOSED to work. even with the barely barely adequate PSU (i believe the card wants 300W).

the extra 1 ghz would not make that big of a difference. i should have at least been able to run an old game like CS CZ on my 1.9. the drastically different ram might be a problem, but again, i would still be able to run games i could run before, like CS CZ. Now, the AGP slot. we went into the catalyst control center and set the agp speed to 4x to see what effect it would have. we went back to Doom3, and *gasp* it went down to 35 to 40 fps in intense battles! and 50 to 130 in hallways and small battles! oh snap! So, the agp slot doesnt seem to make that big of a difference. we ran 3d mark 2002 with the card in his rig with 8x agp on, and it scored 18,000. his 9600 scored 13,000. im not sure what they're supposed to score, and 02 is out of date anyway. i just DLed 05, and im going to install it and run it with my comp soon.

So kinda as a thanks for his efforts i let him keep the card for a while. i went to put my good ol' fx 5700 back in. i boot the computer, i remove the ati drivers, and restart like it wants me to. when it reboot, and it gets to the desktop, my monitor stops showing the desktop and gives me this " 92k / 58 Hz Frequency out of Range" message. the 'frequency out of range' reminded me of the message you get when you set the resolution is too high for your monitor. i waited like 10 minutes to give it some time to recover, but nothing happened. the monitor was plugged in, the gfx card was running. i was sick of messing with my computer and played xbox for a couple of hours. when i came back, the monitor worked fine. yeah, whatever. i had no video drivers at all, so i downloaded the nvidia drivers and went to install them. in the middle of the installation menu, the part where you click next after the agreement, my monitor again goes black and gives me the same error message.

i give up on the pci card, and put in the x850 again. i remove the nvidia drivers, and install the ati drivers again. the games still run as crappy as ever. i uninstalled the drivers again, cleared them out with Driver Cleaner Pro, and re-installed them, with no effect. i was going to download the drivers from the sapphire site instead of ati, but i noticed they had catalyst 5.5 and ati had 5.7 i had thought at the time that the higher version would be better, but at this point i would try anything. i am going to run 3d mark 2005 with my current settings and 5.7 catalyst drivers from the ati site, and see what happens. then im going to try the 5.5 drivers from the sapphire site. ill post back with results.

so, i am DESPERATE! i just want to play my pc games, lol. this is so complicated, and the x850 wasnt cheap. i really feel i didnt get what i paid for. it might be other hardware problems. i dont know. if you have ANY thoughts, suggestions, personal expericences, questions, ANYTHING, i would appreciate it.
 

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
Ok, 3D mark 2005 gave me 2676. better than i expected. but apparently it doesnt show framerate numbers between 0 and 1. the second showing of the air ship and the giant sea monster thing was less than 50 frames total, heheheh.
 

Spineshank

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2001
7,728
1
71
Yea you got somethng bad going on there. I would try a better powersupply. A no name brand powersupply can be running half of what it says it is for all you know. Not saying go out and buy one but see if you can throw the card into your buddies if he has a better one.
 

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
OK. i ran 3d mark 2005. like a billion times. very different results each time

first: 2676
second: 1578
third: 1775
fourth: 2568
fifth: 1934

yeeeeah. 1578 to 2676.
 

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
i tried the card on my friends computer... it ran doom3 at max settings like its supposed to... his PSU is only 300W. mines 550W, a random brand yes.... but would it seriously make THAT much of a difference? thats crazy. isnt there some way in bios i could check voltage?
just as a note, i know artifacts can be a sign of power deprivation, but i dont see any artifacts during games or anything, but the past few times ive started my rig ive seen some lines at the top of the screen for a sec... i might be able to borrow my friends PSU, and since the card ran fine on his comp we'll see if the PSU makes a difference on mine.

if the power was fluctuating, that might explain the crazy 3d mark scores. i dont think ive ever run 3d mark more than once per time ive changed my computer, tho... is it supposed to vary so much each time?
 

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
More tests. i ran doom3 at 640x480, everything turned down, no AA, low detail, and it ran crappy as ever. i then turned it up to 1600x1200, ultra detail, everything up all the way, 16x AA, and it ran just as bad. no worse, no better. ima sum this up in a 3 letter acronym. wtf.
 

brikis98

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2005
7,253
8
0
i'd like to help, but honestly don't have time (at work) to read through your whole post. however, you mentioned something about your power supply.

take a look at the PSU, and find out how many amps are on the +12V line(s). If it is 18A or less, you need a better PSU.

The overall wattage rating on a PSU is meaningless. For modern day systems, what counts is how many amps are on the +12V line(s).
 

farscape

Senior member
Jan 15, 2002
327
0
0
The voltage requirement of the 850 is what? 1.5 volts and is an 8Xcard.
Your motherboard is an older 4X card - supplying 3+volts(?). Maybe it no likes the voltage supplied.

Power supply is another consideration - cheap is never the way to go. You need lots of good clean 12V

Your buddies put the card in much faster machines than yours. You could also be starving your card with lack of CPU horsepower and lack of memory bandwidth.

EDIT - did you plug in the molex on the 850? and if you did, was it sharing the same line with other stuff?
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: Mij1124
More tests. i ran doom3 at 640x480, everything turned down, no AA, low detail, and it ran crappy as ever. i then turned it up to 1600x1200, ultra detail, everything up all the way, 16x AA, and it ran just as bad. no worse, no better. ima sum this up in a 3 letter acronym. wtf.

So at low rez and very high the frame rate stayed the same. Sounds more like a cpu problem. A CPU limits you at low rez, your card limits you in high rez. So, since they are both the same it's you CPU I'm thinking

Now it did seem that in above novela, it did run fine for a little while, then went downhill.

So, if I was you I would focus on the CPU. Sorry, don't fool with Intel much these days but do they have any type of thermal throttling? Which would kick it down to a lower speed.

Can you run any cpu benchies to prove whether or not it's running like it should?

Fern
 

ProdigyXL

Junior Member
Aug 2, 2005
5
0
0
You probably already thought of this, but man your CPU is completely bottlenecking your videocard. A super fast card is wasted when a CPU can't feed it the data fast enough. You should really consider upgrading the CPU now if you want to see really dramatic peformance increases. Also getting a sub 30 dollar power supply doesn't bode well at all. I paid 90 for my Antec Trublue 480Watt one over a year ago. It might serfice for now, but quality power will make sure you don't undervolt your card and damage it.

I've run into poor performance myself recently. Do a memory check asap. Goto Majorgeeks.com and try Memtest or Memtest86. Let them run for a few hours (goto bed) and see what results you get. Having that older system could mean maybe your ram has gone bad and the system is trying to read/write data to it and getting caught up in that. I removed by bad 512 stick, and the 1.5Gig I have now is running many times better, no weird lock ups and lags.

But again, firstly check out a faster processor. If you are running on the old Willemette core you may need to look at a new motherboard too. Still you can get a decent entry level board and CPU for 200 bucks or less.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Ahhh, here's the part I was looking for:

We then played riddick, which ran awesome, at 1600x1200 everything at max settings at a good framerate. THATS more like it. but, we had to leave, so we shut down the computer and left. when i came back a while later, everything had returned to the way is was before the cleanup, and riddick was unplayable at the same settings as before.

So, it will perform well. But something's hosing it on & off.

Check your CPU or do a reinstall. Looks like you've switched back and forth between drivers many times.
 

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
ok. taking in all this...

the mobo/ram and maybe the psu seem to be the weak point of my comp. my cpu isnt THAT bad, there are worse things, like my slower-than-molases-in-winter pc133 ram. the next thing i would replace would be the mobo or ram, and if i want to upgrade one i gotta upgrade the other too. so it looks pretty clear.

according to the label on the psu, ive got 20A for +12v and 40A for 5v. So going by that, my psu is ok. im a little uncomfortable that the brand is so retarded, but i dont think the psu is the first thing im going to try and upgrade. if anyone has any more tests they think would help reveal something new about the psu, that would be cool.

back to mobo and ram. mobos are not my strong point... im running half blind here. i need something cheap yet effective.

ok, heres a mobo thats a maybe. its REALLY cheap tho.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813186047
i need a 478 socket so i can keep my proc, cause i dont want to spend the money on a new one at the moment. the 3 pci slots is a bit irksome, but i wont need any more than that. i dont plan to have too much pci stuff... looks like it has network and sound in it, so i dont need any pci slots except for the 1 that the 850 uses. even when i get around to upgrading to 5.1 and if i need a new network card, 3 is enough. the ram is nice, pc 3200. i can deal with that :p the micro atx is odd but fine, i dont really care. it'll fit. and the 8x agp which will help, too. cheap, but it should get the job done, as far as i can see. so for all you who know a lot more about mobos, advice welcome.

if im upgrading to pc3200 ram, then i'd most likely get:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820145440
looks fine, and everyone else seemed to love it. the 5 out of 5 rating with 563 reviews is nice to know, too.

the cpu upgrade will come later, i think the decent ram/mobo would go father right now. ill get the cpu before 5.1 tho. i need a job. XD

ok. just for fun, i was checking out procs. i can get a 478 pin 3.0 ghz, 800mhz fsb with heatsink and fan, for 160$. the downside is its refurbished. from newegg, i think its worth it. ill definately keep that pcu in mind for when i have the money.

thats what im considering. a penny for your thoughts?
 

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
ok, a few more questions. in the catalyst control center overdrive section, and in the information center section, it lists the memory clock as 540. which is half of what newegg says it is. on newegg its 1080. its kinda weird. also, the AGP Write section in smartgart in catalyst control center is off. my friend has a radeon card, a 9600xt or 9800xt i forget which, and its set to on in his computer. it says is writes stuff to the comp memory and saves graphics memory for "other data"... not sure what affect it has on gaming. kinda odd. ive never had an ATI card before, and i never had to mess around with my nvidia ones, lol.

ok, those are just a couple of oddities i was curious about. im gonna install and use this 'intel active monitor' to check like voltage and stuff some more, then ill prolly do another uninstall, cleanup, and reinstall of all drivers. ill prolly run that memtest thing tonight, but i dont think my ram is bad, i bought it fairly recently. just slow. but hey, you never know. ill be sleepin, its not wasting time :p
 

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
according to active monitor, my power supply voltages are as such:

+3.3V standby: 3.317, fairly constant
+5V : 5.156 sometimes 5.182
+3.3V mostly 3.300, sometimes 3.317
CPU core(+1.75V): 1.718 max, sometimes as low as 1.694
CPU I/O(+1.5V): 1.484 usually, sometimes down to 1.471

yeah. some of those are a tiny bit low... most are fluctuating slightly. whats that mean for my psu?
 

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
CRAP

so like, i had just installed active monitor, and the temps looked fine, the processor zone at like 42C. a little warm but ok. then while i was uninstalling the drivers, active monitor started beeping at me for temp. i checked, and the proc zone was at 70C, and rising fast. in a minute it was 80. then 85. i took my giant fan, cranked it up, and stuck it 6 inches in front of the open side of my case and blew the crap out lf it. it cooled down a little, but didnt cool down much past 71C, so i shut down my comp. i watied half an hour and restarted my comp, and it was at 42C, and rose to 46C, and now its fluctuating around 46C, but not really going anywhere.

i didnt have anything that so clearly monitored temp before, so i its possible it was a problem. hahah. i would try a game now, but i dont have any drivers, so i gotta finish cleaning them up then installing them again. the temp is mostly stable for now, i dare not move the giant fan. so yeah. new proc time, anyone? :p

and btw, i had nothing overclocked. i didnt even have overdrive unlocked in the catalyst control center. nothin. so somethins weird. maybe somethings funky with my heatsink, i dunno. my case was open the whole time with like 4 fans in it, so it should have been adequately ventilated... any suggestions as to how to tell what went wrong?
 

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
LOLOLOLOLOL
ignore the overheating thing

the 550W psu is new, i got it a few days ago when my old one started to smell like something burning. apparently, you shouldnt hook up the power in your computer with friends in the room and you being distracted. i kinda forgot to hook up the fan on the cpu heheheheh. so yeah, now its at a healthy 33C. yeah. i know, shut up.


EDIT: I still like the record of 85 degrees celsuius for my proc. lol thats hot. and it still worked too :p
 

thegimp03

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2004
7,420
2
81
That 1.9A is definitely bottlenecking your x850 xt. There's no question about it. You're in serious need of a new cpu and motherboard with that card my friend. :) I'd recommend at least an a64 3000+ or a P4 3 ghz if you want to go Pentium again.

An x850 xt on one of those processors will hit at least 5800 in 3dmark05, which is about right.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
I still think you outta read my post about your cpu. Check out thermal throttleing. Run benchies on it. If fine, try gaming after reinstalling drivers, or an OS reinstall.

I'm betting it will perform fine.

If were you, for the time being I'd forget about the PSU, ram and upgrades etc.

As you forgot about the CPU fan header, I'm still thinking as stated above in my first post it's a CPU thingy and you likely have solved it now.

Fern
 

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
aight. got any good links for benchmark programs?

active monitor gives me the proc being like 40C, and games still run just as crappy... i know thats a little hot, but i dont think the thermal throttling would really do THAT much at that temp. but im willing to check it out if you have an easy way to tell exactly whats going on...

im reinstalling driver for like the billionth time. i still dont know what happened differently that one time it worked. in a couple days ill be in an air conditioned room, and the temp should decrease a good chunk. im sure the heat outside right now isnt helping anything.

i cant run half-life 2 for crap.... but i just downloaded and played the new FEAR single player demo. it ran great, except for random sudden extreme lag, but thats definately just my ram. crappy pc133. even if i get my gfx card fixed, i really need better ram lol. but anyway. why does fear run so awesome and hl2 so crappy? they both use direct x... if anything, fear is more demanding. i couldnt run fear for my life with my old pci card, but i could run hl2 great with it. and now hl2 is outrageously laggy, and fear runs awesome. NO SENSE!!! any ideas? its the randomness of the games i can and cant run compared to what i could and couldnt run before that is driving me nuts. even if my cpu was bottlenecking my 850, it wouldnt run crappier than my pci would, would it? but even if it did, that would make all the games run worse. which isnt the case. i dont get it at all.
 

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
So. ive gotten a lot of answers and suggestions so far. i dont think any one thing is solely responsible.

what looks like the biggest problem is the cpu. either there is something wrong with mine right now and its abnormally slow, or 1.9 is just way too slow for a card of this calibur. one question remaining about this; if the cpu isnt good enough for my gfx card, and it is good enough for a much crappier card, would it make the good card run worse than the crappy card? but even if it would... why does fear run well? ok thats 2 questions :p

ram is contributing a little to the lag, being slow crap-for-crap pc133. it wouldnt have this drastic or erratic an effect, though. it needs to be replaced eventually, but its not the focus. however, if i upgrade my cpu or mobo, i gotta upgrade ram anyway.

my PSU might be a slight problem. according to the label the voltage is fine, but i dont know what its REALLY doing. if someone has a program to measur that, that'd be nice. active monitor is ok, it tells me a bit. some of the numbers are very slightly low, and most are fluctuating a bit. this could be a long term problem, but for now it wouldnt have too drastic effect.

my mobo could be a problem with the old 4x agp, and it might be screwing up voltage. its definately holding back the card a little with the 4x, but that alone should still let it run most games fine, and wouldnt have that big of an effect.

and quoting one of my old unanswered questions:
'in the catalyst control center overdrive section, and in the information center section, it lists the memory clock as 540. which is half of what newegg says it is. on newegg its listed as 1080. its kinda weird'
yeah im just curious about that.


but is it possible that there is nothing drastically wrong with any of my stuff, and its just a combination of small inadequacies that make it run so bad?

again i warmly welcome any links to places to get benchmarks to tell me more.
 

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
ok, i just uninstalled the drivers, used driver cleaner pro (more on that ina sec) and reinstalled them. now my card actually works! gasp! riddick, halo, americas army, morrowind, etc all ran awesome. the only lag in doom3, fear, and hl2 is obviously ram problems. so yeah. we'll find out what happens when i shut down, and next time i start my comp. last time this happened it went back to running crappy next time i started. ima try it now. i really need new ram lol.
 
May 31, 2001
15,326
2
0
Doom 3 is one of the few games where that card didn't beat out NVidia competition. The game is optimized for NVidia, for better or for worse. I have the same card.
 

Mij1124

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2005
16
0
0
ok, that makes me feel better. cause it lags way more than any other game. poor ati tho. =/

i was just testing out more games, and my comp is still running fine. i guess i solved the driver problem. kinda odd cause i got this system32 error, heheheheh. but hey it works. dunno for how long, i doubt its completely fixed. im still planning on upgrading my mobo and ram, though. that'll go a LONG way. but for now, my card finally runs better than my old one in every game. thats the biggest thing i was looking for. lets hope everything stays working at least as good as this. im counting on ati releasing much better drivers eventually, i mean this is a very new card. catalyst 5.7 is messed.
 

gorcorps

aka Brandon
Jul 18, 2004
30,739
454
126
you could try omegadrivers.net They make tweaked video drivers that are very stable and make things run more smoothly (might give ya a bit of a boost on doom3 until your upgrade ;))