• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X OC techpowerup review

I think I'd pay $80 more for a next level card, to be honest.

true. currently I see two stellar cards in terms of value for money aka perf/$. R9 390 and GTX 980 Ti. I would say if somebody wants a reasonably good 1440p performance they should get R9 390. If they want the best 1440p performance that money can buy they should get a custom GTX 980 Ti OC like the MSI GTX 980 Ti Gaming or ASUS GTX 980 Strix. Everything in between is a neither here nor there choice. The cards in between don't fundamentally change the gaming experience over a R9 390 the way a 980 Ti OC does.
 
Last edited:
I would be curious about the unlock rate. Price still a tad high it seems.
 
I think I'd pay $80 more for a next level card, to be honest.

This. It makes no sense when you are spending this level of money $$ for this type of tier of GPU power. IMO a $550 pricing level GPU doesn't make sense compared to the high end Fury X/980 TI options for the dollar difference.
 
This. It makes no sense when you are spending this level of money $$ for this type of tier of GPU power. IMO a $550 pricing level GPU doesn't make sense compared to the high end Fury X/980 TI options for the dollar difference.

You must have missed all of the people saying the Fury X would be awesome @ $550. Or they would never want liquid cooling. I think for the current market the perf/$ is right where it belongs. Thus why 980/ti have dropped in price since Fury's release.
 
Back
Top