This is my very first post on AT, but believe me im a long long time lurker.
finally decided to join the big game after catching the bug to go CONROE
I have almost completed my rig, just waiting to get the P5B del with REV 1.04g. i also picked up the X1950XT 256MB. now my local retailer also had the 512 MB version from sapphire that was an extra $35.
since then i was googling 256 vs 512 & basically make to the understanding 512 would be advantages on settings 1600 and beyond. is this rite?
I couldnt get the specs of the 512MB on the sapphire site? weird? & then i came across this article "http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-1...0-XT-256mb.html", which indicates the 512 mem freq is abt 200 MHz (1600) less than the 256 mem freq (1800) . is this true? if so is there a possibility the MEM modules used for the 512 are different from the 256 ver? a possible performance penalty?
any suggestions and pointing towards the rite direction would be appreciated
a very excited gamer..itching to game @ MAX settings
finally decided to join the big game after catching the bug to go CONROE
I have almost completed my rig, just waiting to get the P5B del with REV 1.04g. i also picked up the X1950XT 256MB. now my local retailer also had the 512 MB version from sapphire that was an extra $35.
since then i was googling 256 vs 512 & basically make to the understanding 512 would be advantages on settings 1600 and beyond. is this rite?
I couldnt get the specs of the 512MB on the sapphire site? weird? & then i came across this article "http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-1...0-XT-256mb.html", which indicates the 512 mem freq is abt 200 MHz (1600) less than the 256 mem freq (1800) . is this true? if so is there a possibility the MEM modules used for the 512 are different from the 256 ver? a possible performance penalty?
any suggestions and pointing towards the rite direction would be appreciated
a very excited gamer..itching to game @ MAX settings