• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Discussion Samsung Exynos SoC thread

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
There is huge gape between A5x and S series, they really need this phone, with proper upper midrange soc.
So that means that next year the A7X series will revive but means that the S26 FE might cost more than expecting... even the S26 might get a real jump in prices

PS: Just in case... the A77 IS REAL!!!!

1763818795663.png

But 8GB RAM?
1763818815895.png
 
Last edited:
internal evaluations indicated "AI engine" performance being about six times greater than on Apple's current flagship A19 Pro SoC.

When compared to the omnipresent Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset, Samsung's proprietary design (allegedly) did better in NPU and iGPU test scenarios—up to 30% and 29% faster, respectively.


Exynos 2600 SoC Could Power Galaxy Z Flip 8, Report Suggests Considerable NPU Performance

by T0@st Today, 01:09 Discuss (1 Comment)
Hours ago, Samsung Semiconductor's website was updated with an extensive Exynos 2600 splash page
 
internal evaluations indicated "AI engine" performance being about six times greater than on Apple's current flagship A19 Pro SoC.

When compared to the omnipresent Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset, Samsung's proprietary design (allegedly) did better in NPU and iGPU test scenarios—up to 30% and 29% faster, respectively.


Exynos 2600 SoC Could Power Galaxy Z Flip 8, Report Suggests Considerable NPU Performance

by T0@st Today, 01:09 Discuss (1 Comment)
Hours ago, Samsung Semiconductor's website was updated with an extensive Exynos 2600 splash page
Should be quite a good product if it plays out how its been rumored. Will be interesting to see the Geekbench AI scores to compare against each chipset.
 
internal evaluations indicated "AI engine" performance being about six times greater than on Apple's current flagship A19 Pro SoC.

When compared to the omnipresent Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset, Samsung's proprietary design (allegedly) did better in NPU and iGPU test scenarios—up to 30% and 29% faster, respectively.


Exynos 2600 SoC Could Power Galaxy Z Flip 8, Report Suggests Considerable NPU Performance

by T0@st Today, 01:09 Discuss (1 Comment)
Hours ago, Samsung Semiconductor's website was updated with an extensive Exynos 2600 splash page

What kind of strange math is this? The difference in TOPS in NPU between A19 Pro and 8 Elite Gen 5 is twofold (in practice, only 20-30%), but the statement says that Exynos 2600 is 6 times ahead of A19 Pro, and the difference with 8 Elite Gen 5 is the same 20-30%? Total BS.
 
Would be interesting to see the performance different. I doubt they’d release something inferior, but to get ahead of AMD also doesn’t seem likely.
It will be something inferior by far. Look at Huawei's Maleoon.

Samsung has an issue Huawei don't have: an own iteration of their OS. Apple has iOS, Huawei Harmony OS, but Samsung has Android and has to share with Qualcomm their marketshare.

The only way Samsung has to win is to make a own special Android version for that Exynos processors.
 
Last edited:
It will be something inferior by far. Look at Huawei's Maleoon.

Samsung has an issue Huawei don't have: an own iteration of their OS. Apple has iOS, Huawei Harmony OS, but Samsung has Android and has to share with Qualcomm their marketshare.

The only way Samsung has to win is to make an own special Android version for that Exynos processors.
I’d imagine they’d still want to have a competitive offering.
 
Link

A Samsung Electronics official stated, "GPU development has many variables, and it is difficult to give a definitive answer as to whether we will develop it ourselves in the future," and added, "The LSI division will continue to cooperate with AMD."


 
So this means more time with AMD. Maybe Samsung should start to think their own GPU idea on lower tiers processors first
 
So this means more time with AMD. Maybe Samsung should start to think their own GPU idea on lower tiers processors first

They will probably do it like Apple did with their modems. Apple even built the uncertainty into their last contract with Qualcomm, which was for four years with an optional two year extension (which they exercised, and will use about a year's worth of the two)

I still think Samsung needs to devote a lot more resources to their modem - that's a lot more important to their mobile unit's profitability than what GPU they use and how good it is. Even if they got their foundry roughly on par with TSMC, got a GPU roughly on par with AMD, and got ARM cores roughly on par with Qualcomm's they would STILL be using Qualcomm SoCs in much of the world until they fix their stupid modem!
 
New GB6 result for what looks to be a Samsung Galaxy 26+. There are two results which were posted today. This is the higher scoring one.
1769826780618.png
Pretty damn impressive PPC. At A19 Pro level (assuming this isn’t the peak of performance).
 
New GB6 result for what looks to be a Samsung Galaxy 26+. There are two results which were posted today. This is the higher scoring one.
View attachment 137664
Pretty damn impressive PPC. At A19 Pro level (assuming this isn’t the peak of performance).
Samsung should start to think to make a laptop with that processor. GPU wise would be competent too, and driver support might be helped by AMD.
 
These phone processors are getting stupidly powerful. About time they put these into laptops.

Apple is doing it with A18 Macbook.
not so simple. Nvidia's attempts to get WoA run on mediatek have been a miserable failure

there is a reason that x86 rules
 
Make a nice Linux laptop that aims to sell a few hundred thousand units and build a new market. Windows isn't anywhere near as relevant as it used to be.
You kinda underestimated Windows there.
Don't forget that Apple is giving Windows a run for their money.
Apple has the money to throw around to app developers, and a big userbase that is basically locked in their ecosystem. I'd argue Samsung has neither and they would need some very big breakthrough to push consumers toward their own Linux distro and hardware.
 
Back
Top