Originally posted by: SacrosanctFiend
Simply bringing me an offer letter isn't going to make me want to increase the offer. I wouldn't disqualify them (or penalize them in any way) for doing so, but I care about the value they will bring, not what others are willing to pay them.
As I stated before, there is plenty of room to negotiate, but the candidate needs to negotiate based off of their KSA, not what others are willing to pay. Money shouldn't be the only factor, and I'm willing to wait for someone who believes that. You usually end up with higher engagement from those ee's.
1.) But if others are willing to pay them more than you are, then that means they recognize the value that the "prospective employee" will bring compared to if they worked at your firm otherwise they wouldn't offer them more. Correct?
2.) Usually yes, but that is not always the case.
I will work my hardest to rise to the top regardless of where I'm at. Sitting there like a penguin, regardless of what a company is willing to pay me won't achieve anything or help me climb the ladder.
Scenario:
Company A is 10mins away and offers higher salary, benefits, and compensation.
Company B is 10mins away and offers lower salary, benefits, and compensation.
Would you automatically assume that because I have a neighbor who goes to work at Company B that he would bring higher value and engagement than I would?
I think that would be a gross generalization on your part.
You don't know if my neighbor goes there simply because his GF works there, or because the fine females at the firm gives him a hard on every morning and he's looking to date one of them, or because he simply has a family member/friend who already works there, or because it's a laid back job in which he can browse ATOT when he's supposed to be working.
An even better example:
Government jobs "generally" pay less in salary/benefits/compensation compared to the private sector, but yet they're still "generally" regarded as more lazy and produce much less products, especially when comparing products/employee(which in turn will affect revenue/employee) and many other statistics etc...
Money shouldn't be the only factor of course, that's why I also compared other factors such as vacation days, and other numerous benefits/discounts/compensation structure when I went to my interview.
I'm sure your firm does it's own analysis and I'm not here to argue that.
Just letting you know that you shouldn't make such generalizations about me if I decide to apply for your firm sometime in the future and do the same thing that I did at my current job.
