highland145
Lifer
Opinion then.
the Rottweiler, which is widely believed to be an aggressive dog, scored average to below average ratings for its hostility toward strangers.
Opinion then.
the Rottweiler, which is widely believed to be an aggressive dog, scored average to below average ratings for its hostility toward strangers.
Opinion then.
According to the Telegraph, the Rottweiler, which is widely believed to be an aggressive dog, scored average to below average ratings for its hostility toward strangers.
The newspaper reported that some of the lowest scoring breeds for aggression included the Basset hound, golden retriever, Labradors, Siberian huskies and greyhounds.
Aside from the killing of the dog, who the hell wants someone firing a weapon in and around their property? Someone else could of been hurt or killed, and the sad thing is we would still have cop defense squad in full force.
You are obviously not from earth.
Protect its property/territory is what the dog did by barking. It treated the cop as an intruder, and an intruder is exactly what the cop is. He/she could have called out and waited for someone that the dog is familiar to to introduce them.
exactly. bullets could ricochet off the ground and hurt someone in the area. that cop who murdered the woodcarver in the other thread fired about 5 times on a busy street. he could have hit a car or a window and committed other murders as well
You are obviously not from earth.
Protect its property/territory is what the dog did by barking. It treated the cop as an intruder, and an intruder is exactly what the cop is. He/she could have called out and waited for someone that the dog is familiar to to introduce them.
I'm not condoning violent dog behavior, but in this case it would have justified if the fucking cop were mauled buy a pack of pit bulls or huskies.
You obviously have no reading comprehension skills. The cop was not an intruder, he was on foot patrol, and the dog ran after him. It didn't say the cop was on their property.
It didn't state that the cop were on the side walk or in the dog yard. However the dog was killed in its yard and the family had an electric fence.You obviously have no reading comprehension skills. The cop was not an intruder, he was on foot patrol, and the dog ran after him. It didn't say the cop was on their property.
The officer ordered the dog to stop and when it didn't, the officer shot and killed the animal in its yard, Daniel said.
Boomer was killed about 25 feet from his spot on the front porch, close to her front door, King said. He was not on a leash.
The family had an electric fence, but there was not a sign alerting the officer it was there, Daniel said.
I wonder what would happen if my sausage dog and chihuahua ran up to a cop in my driveway. Probably call in the SWAT team.
Just because the cop says it was charging doesn't make it true. The lying dirtbag in this case said the same thing about the 12-pound min-dachshund he killed. His buddies who performed the initial investigation suppressed physical evidence that contradicted his lies and cleared him of wrongdoing, but public outrage led to a second investigation that resulted in his termination.
SWAT shoot corgis on sight, so I'd assume your sausage dog would be the same.
It didn't state that the cop were on the side walk or in the dog yard. However the dog was killed in its yard and the family had an electric fence.
So what does the cop has to fear if the dog was behind a fence?correct. it certainly doesnt say he walked on to the property and busted a cap in the dogs ass then raped the family like some on here seem to think he did :whiste:
DB cop does something pussy-like and dumb (and not at all typical of all cops! contrary to what these stories make it sound, most cops are smart/sane) : instant flame-bait to authoritarian bootlickers who want to suck the cop's dick over it, and the rampant blinded cop-haters on the other side. We are all jack's complete lack of surprise.
Points that need to be restating :
(1)- Mailmen don't carry .40 caliber semiautomatic pistols, and seem to manage just fine. A cop should be well versed in the different breeds and situations in dealing not just with dogs, but all probable animals he might encounter in a given area of duty. Common sense.
(2)- A golden retriever can be medium to large, but they are instantly identifiable as a mild breed. If it were a black lab or something, I could understand having trouble mistaking it for possibly a rott in a split-second decision time. Speaking of Rotts :
(3)- Anyone who's spent time with dogs knows full well that Golden Retrievers and Rotts are vastly different sort of dogs. GR are very friendly, energetic, and notably smaller than Rotts on average (~60-80lbs vs. 85-135lb typical). A rott chasing you is second only to a Pit chasing you, if you don't know the dog, in terms of immediate physical danger. Rotts are MUCH stronger than GRs, much more muscular dog, particularly the jaws and shoulders. GR is more of a running dog. You may as well compare a goldfish to a barracuda (not saying Rotts are bad dogs, but they can be one dangerous cuss if they are after you with malice).
(4)- Vague article is vague. Taken at face value, this cop made a rash decision and killed this dog needlessly. HOWEVER, perhaps this GR was waaaaay out of the norm, and instead of being happy/friendly, was really pissed off and ready to attack something. This behavior is much more common in abused animals, and it's not just Pits that are abused, that's for sure.
Seriously? What a fucking moron. How goddamn stupid do you have to be to think that dog is actually going to attack you?
There's a huge difference between a dog barking just to bark at shit and a dog looking to attack something. If my dog bit everything she barked at then every car, person, bird, tree, family member, and breeze to come within a hundred yards of our house would be covered in teeth marks. But they aren't.
Oh please. I'm not the one who needs to stop and think, the cop needed to do that. You don't just go around with a gun in a neighborhood and shoot at anything that moves. You need to think and assess the situation, including the threat. Considering that the dog was still IN THE YARD and that the officer was OUTSIDE THE YARD, I have a difficult time thinking that the officer didn't have time to take other action, including waiting or backing up. If the dog actually comes out of the yard, then yes, it's unrestrained and I can see taking action to protect himself from the dog.
I wasn't there, so I don't know. We're all speculating based on the information provided, and based on what I've read, I think the action was very inappropriate and I don't think I'd be confident with such a trigger happy (or incompetent) individual walking my neighborhood armed and ready to blast anything that might move.
So what does the cop has to fear if the dog was behind a fence?
WWYBYWB?
And all wrong. Bottom line, you don't put leash or fence up your dog and it charges me, if I feel like it's gonna hurt me, I will take it down. Don't like it, put up a fucking fence.
BTW the bolded part has to be one of the dumbest things I've seen posted and I've seen tons of stupidity on these forums 😀
no leash is fair game.
<---- dog owner