- Nov 12, 1999
Clueless and typical yet again. Another sniveling whiner paralleling comfort and support for the suffering Iraqi people with the 3rd reich......You are Rightous, are part of the new Master Race, in effect.
Pathetic and wholly expected. I should have quit reading after that 3rd sentence of your post quoted above.
LOL, well when one uses the argument of a liberal............Interesting how those who are agains this have to be liberal. You nicely pigenhole people for your own purposes.
This question has been answered before: of course not, however; these same people would be tortured or starved instead. So you tell me, does it matter to the dead if they were killed because they were overheard saying something negative about Saddam or because Saddam used them as cannon fodder to slow an advancing army?Now the question is this, and answer is yes or no if you have the wit. If US troops were not invading, would people be blowing themselves and US soldiers up?
The debate isn't whether or not these people would be killed absent our invation, but who is to blame for this sad reality. Your contention is that we are to blame, a more reasonable person believes that Saddam is to blame--especially since in effect he is flipping the switch, pulling the trigger, or training and sending off children to the front.
I am not "claiming" anything, I am hoping. I will hold Bush accountable to his promise to the Iraqi people. I have friends and a sister-in-law with family who still live in Baghdad.We are killing people there for all the good you claim will come from it.