- Jul 10, 2006
- 29,873
- 463
- 126
Mo' debinitely. But while it's good to walk the straight and narrow, you can't do that if you start in a hole.Were - You don't think something is strange about a philosophically individualist party going after groups?
The GOP doesn't need to target blacks as a group; that would be a problem. Instead it needs to find like-minded individuals who make could attractive candidates and whose physical characteristics happen to fall within the grouping we classify as black. In almost any district there are a number of qualified and electable candidates with views within the mainstream of conservative beliefs. Some of those will be black. But it's hard for those potential candidates to see the GOP as a possible venue. It's also hard for conservative blacks to believe they can be elected. This is what the GOP needs to fix. Put it this way: I know no members of the New Black Panther Party. I therefore do not necessarily know that they are racist. But as they are a monochromatic party, I presume that they are racist. The GOP has the same perception problem with blacks. It's not enough for them to SAY they aren't racist, they need to actively work at proving it. True, it's quite ironic that in order to prove oneself colorblind one must sometimes be color-sensitive.
The few GOP outreach programs have started with the question "What do black people want and how can we promise it to them?" The problem is with this question, you'll never get the right answer. Black people more or less want what non-black people want - opportunity, prosperity, a better life for their children. The problem isn't message or principles; one cannot compromise principles. The problem is the perception of inclusion. The Democrats actively worked to get most blacks away from the party of Lincoln; the Republicans must actively work to get them back.