Russian patrol kills Japanese fisherman

[Trianon]

Originally posted by: albatross
"Russia claimed them as result of WWII operations":exactly.and since japan and russia are still at war japan could "claim" them back.

And therefore eat lead, as happened yesterday. Your POV strikes as hypocritical, interpreting laws in whatever way "proves" your point. The fact that SF treaty wasn't signed by the USSR means that it didn't agree with its terms at the time, who was going to force the USSR to do it? Anyway, moot point arguing about it until the territorial question is resolved.
If Japanese felt they weren't poaching in Russian waters, why run and throw away the catch??? That is not a proper diplomatic way to resolve disputes.

 

[Albatross]

Originally posted by: Trianon

Originally posted by: albatross
"Russia claimed them as result of WWII operations":exactly.and since japan and russia are still at war japan could "claim" them back.

And therefore eat lead.

russia or japan?

 

[Albatross]

Originally posted by: Trianon

Originally posted by: albatross
"Russia claimed them as result of WWII operations":exactly.and since japan and russia are still at war japan could "claim" them back.

And therefore eat lead. Your POV strikes as hypocritical, interpreting laws in whatever way "proves" your point. The fact that SF treaty wasn't signed by the USSR means that it didn't agree with its terms at the time, who was going to force the USSR to do it? Anyway, moot point arguing about it until the territorial question is resolved.

you said that that russia didn`t steal those island and when proven wrong,you project your own hypocrisy on me. good job.

 

[Trianon]

Originally posted by: albatross
you said that that russia didn`t steal those island and when proven wrong,you project your own hypocrisy on me. good job.

your ridiculous argument makes no sense.

Japanese admit they were poaching