Russia wants '100% proof' N.Korea sunk ship

[al981]

Not admitted.


Honestly. Not exactly the most important event in history.

Lol, you fail at english. NOT admitted. You have a consperiacy theory without any evidence to back it up "Oh noes, someone that wasn't Identified was on the scene!"


Link much?


Idiot. People saw something in the sky and claim it was a missile. That is NOT evidence. Human memory is unreliable.


Now I know your retarded. Tell me, Why and How.


Link?


rfk?


Yep, no wmd.

You'll notice in all your inane babbling, you didn't ONCE link to any thing "admitted" (though tonkin was admitted in official reports, you still didn't bother to actually link to it. I never figured it as a "cover up" as it lasted what, a couple of years?)

Let me repeat my request, Show me a link to a press release by the US government "admitting" to the coverups.

They can't keep a senitor with his pants down a secret for more then a week, what makes you think they have the ability to keep half this stuff secret for 40+ years?

you are pathetic.

1) you still won't admit the us government overthrew the democracy of iran. you fail. so hard. i'm not posting a link for you. continue to remain ignorant

2) you don't know who rfk is? i'm not posting a link for you. ignorant again x10.

3) oklahoma and failure to release security footage of more suspects = cover-up. i don't need the us government to admit it's a cover-up, genius

4) twa flight 800: the us government jailed a few news reporters who ran independent residue tests from flight 800's frame which were found to be consistent with explosives. i'm not posting a link for you, but LOL at you. this in addition to all the witnesses crying foul.

5) 9/11, too easy. do your own research. it's been almost a decade, son.

6) iraq 2: yeah, like i said, confirmed. what, are you waiting for a news story? hahaha.

7) gulf of tonkin admitted false flag op. you realize this launched vietnam war, RIGHT? ignorant x100. you fail.

 

[al981]

1 of the events...

more than 1. try again.

 

[al981]

8) mlk: the king family has its own website which has their thoughts on the guilty verdict. i'm not posting a link for you.

on second thought:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1999/12/08/civilrights/main73745.shtml

here's your homework assignment. go look up the king family website and write a report on the evidence presented. guilty!

 

[piasabird]

So what other country was firing a chinese made torpedo?

 

[Kirby]

funny how a retard AzN thread can go full potato IQ with a truther.

AzN still hasn't answered any questions we've asked in the past.

How old are you?
Where are you from?
What are you doing in the US?
Why are you here if you hate it so much?
How can you hate capitalism while having the pc in your sig?
How can you slam pro-western news while posting something written by a fucking North Korean?

 

[al981]

funny how a retard AzN thread can go full potato IQ with a truther.

correction: i'm concerned with the facts. if you want to equate factualism with truthers, so be it. the facts are on my side, as proven above what do you qualify as nkgreen? liar and anti fact nutjob?

 

[mfenn]

correction: i'm concerned with the facts. if you want to equate factualism with truthers, so be it. the facts are on my side, as proven above what do you qualify as nkgreen? liar and anti fact nutjob?

Ya because refusing to post links is "factualism".

"They're facts because the voices in my head told me so!"

 

[MotF Bane]

correction: i'm concerned with the facts. if you want to equate factualism with truthers, so be it. the facts are on my side, as proven above what do you qualify as nkgreen? liar and anti fact nutjob?

You qualify as a troll, derailing this thread.

 

[Cogman]

correction: i'm concerned with the facts. if you want to equate factualism with truthers, so be it. the facts are on my side, as proven above what do you qualify as nkgreen? liar and anti fact nutjob?

link up or shut up

 

[Kirby]

correction: i'm concerned with the facts. if you want to equate factualism with truthers, so be it. the facts are on my side, as proven above what do you qualify as nkgreen? liar and anti fact nutjob?

your facts are homegrown by fat virgins living in their mother's basement, gaining subsistence from hot pockets and gummi worms. the only thing your facts have proven is that your mother has hot pockets and gummi worms on her grocery list.

congratulations, you're an idiot with the mental capacity somewhere between a potato and brake rotor. i hope you're proud.

 

[al981]

link up or shut up

i'm not doing your homework. and you still don't have the guts to admit you're wrong about iran. c'mon boy, i adre you to admit the united states overthrew the iran democracy, just to prove me right. hahaha.

ironic you have nothing to say about the mlk cbsnews link huh. c'mon boy! homework is due!

 

[Cogman]

i'm not doing your homework. and you still don't have the guts to admit you're wrong about iran. c'mon boy, i adre you to admit the united states overthrew the iran democracy, just to prove me right. hahaha.

ironic you have nothing to say about the mlk cbsnews link huh. c'mon boy! homework is due!

Its not MY homework, YOUR making the outlandish claims. Your claim "Admitted Conspiracies" yet provide NO proof of said admitted conspiracies other then a wall of text YOU write.

When someone makes an outlandish claim IE your 911 baloney or flight 800 crap. The burden of proof falls on you, not me.

As for the MLK link, Are you seriously retarded enough to say jury ruling = federal government admission. Are you really that dense? You did have 1, MAYBE 2, valid points in your stream of conspiracy crap, And I'm sorry that the valid truths get lumped together.

http://www.justice.gov/crt/crim/mlk/part2.php

This is the investigation report that resulted from the trial you linked. Guess what. Conspiracy not found.

"admitted lies" Show me where the US government has admitted. Not the "evidence" of the coverup, or papers by fellow conspiracy theorists. I want a link to a press release or official US government document. And no, I'm not searching for what YOU claim. Do you expect me to look up every retarded claim spouted on the internet?

More specifically, Since my knowledge of some historical events is sadly lacking. I want to see where the government "admitted" to the following (Again, that ISN'T proof of the event being covered up.)
jfk. 9/11. mlk. oklahoma city. twa flight 800. . iraq 2.
(look, I took 2 out for you)

Again. Link up, or shut up.

 

[al981]

Its not MY homework, YOUR making the outlandish claims. Your claim "Admitted Conspiracies" yet provide NO proof of said admitted conspiracies other then a wall of text YOU write.

When someone makes an outlandish claim IE your 911 baloney or flight 800 crap. The burden of proof falls on you, not me.

As for the MLK link, Are you seriously retarded enough to say jury ruling = federal government admission. Are you really that dense? You did have 1, MAYBE 2, valid points in your stream of conspiracy crap, And I'm sorry that the valid truths get lumped together.

http://www.justice.gov/crt/crim/mlk/part2.php

This is the investigation report that resulted from the trial you linked. Guess what. Conspiracy not found.

"admitted lies" Show me where the US government has admitted. Not the "evidence" of the coverup, or papers by fellow conspiracy theorists. I want a link to a press release or official US government document. And no, I'm not searching for what YOU claim. Do you expect me to look up every retarded claim spouted on the internet?

More specifically, Since my knowledge of some historical events is sadly lacking. I want to see where the government "admitted" to the following (Again, that ISN'T proof of the event being covered up.)
jfk. 9/11. mlk. oklahoma city. twa flight 800. . iraq 2.
(look, I took 2 out for you)

Again. Link up, or shut up.

when you're too ignorant to know that the united states government admitted to overthrowing the democracy of iran, it is YOU who needs to do his homework.

when you're too ignorant to know who rfk is, it is YOU who needs to do his homework.

when you're too ignorant to know the gulf of tonkin incident is an admitted lie, and that the signifigance of it was the start of the vietnam war which claimed how many american and vietnamese lives, it is YOU who needs to do his homework.

do your homework, kid!

as for mlk: the king family has 100x more credibility than your lies and the us government lies regarding dr king's death. like the cbs article said: unanimous verdict. us federal agencies guilty in conspiracy. oh snap son. the justice department doesn't have to "admit" anything, and has continued to deny it just like you, but it is clear as day.

similar amount / tremendous evidence also applies to 9/11 , jfk, oklahoma city, etc. it is your right to deny all said evidence. i have proven the us government has continued to lie its ass off for decades (which you are still in denial about). are you still in denial about iran? seriously? gg ignorant liar.

back to your homework assignment, kid.

 

[al981]

You qualify as a troll, derailing this thread.

not really. the us and its allies have no credibility as shown. the intitial investigation is a whitewash if it doesn't include "non-allies". and lol at the pen marking evidence.

 

[al981]

your facts are homegrown by fat virgins living in their mother's basement, gaining subsistence from hot pockets and gummi worms. the only thing your facts have proven is that your mother has hot pockets and gummi worms on her grocery list.

congratulations, you're an idiot with the mental capacity somewhere between a potato and brake rotor. i hope you're proud.

says the liar / fact denier. you fit your avatar perfectly, son!

 

[MikeMike]

russia to mlk by way of nk

 

[Cogman]

when you're too ignorant to know that the united states government admitted to overthrowing the democracy of iran, it is YOU who needs to do his homework.

when you're too ignorant to know who rfk is, it is YOU who needs to do his homework.

when you're too ignorant to know the gulf of tonkin incident is an admitted lie, and that the signifigance of it was the start of the vietnam war which claimed how many american and vietnamese lives, it is YOU who needs to do his homework.

do your homework, kid!

as for mlk: the king family has 100x more credibility than your lies and the us government lies regarding dr king's death. like the cbs article said: unanimous verdict. us federal agencies guilty in conspiracy. oh snap son. the justice department doesn't have to "admit" anything, and has continued to deny it just like you, but it is clear as day.

similar amount / tremendous evidence also applies to 9/11 , jfk, oklahoma city, etc. it is your right to deny all said evidence. i have proven the us government has continued to lie its ass off for decades (which you are still in denial about). are you still in denial about iran? seriously? gg ignorant liar.

back to your homework assignment, kid.

Ahem. Link up or shut up. I want to see those "admitted Lies".

 

[al981]

Ahem. Link up or shut up. I want to see those "admitted Lies".

no. you choosing to remain a moron is your right

 

[Cogman]

no. you choosing to remain a moron is your right

He he he. Gee, I wonder who is making the stronger argument. The guy who makes baseless claims without evidence, or the guy who calls him out on it.

Glad to see you've proven yourself completely irrational and unable to debate. MLK is a perfect example, you posted a jury hearing, I posted the results of said hearing, and you vehemently deny the results cause they don't jive with your state of mind. "Oh, I trust the luther family.. not reality!" BTW, the Luther family considered it case closed. If you trust them so much, why don't you take their stance?

In any debate. When someone makes a baseless claim, the burden of proof falls on them. You claimed admitted lies, I called. Now it is your job to prove me wrong (which you have yet to do). Thats how this whole debate thing works. It isn't my job to go out and try and prove your point. If that's the case, then I'll just say it right now "Oh, I didn't see any evidence to support your claims." Much easier then having to search and dig for information that I don't believe exists!

 

[al981]

He he he. Gee, I wonder who is making the stronger argument. The guy who makes baseless claims without evidence, or the guy who calls him out on it.

Glad to see you've proven yourself completely irrational and unable to debate. MLK is a perfect example, you posted a jury hearing, I posted the results of said hearing, and you vehemently deny the results cause they don't jive with your state of mind. "Oh, I trust the luther family.. not reality!" BTW, the Luther family considered it case closed. If you trust them so much, why don't you take their stance?

In any debate. When someone makes a baseless claim, the burden of proof falls on them. You claimed admitted lies, I called. Now it is your job to prove me wrong (which you have yet to do). Thats how this whole debate thing works. It isn't my job to go out and try and prove your point. If that's the case, then I'll just say it right now "Oh, I didn't see any evidence to support your claims." Much easier then having to search and dig for information that I don't believe exists!

i'm still not giving you a link. you have the right to remain a moron. everyone on this forum but you knows that the american government staged a coup to overthrow iran enjoy your crow when you decide to grow up and look that up.

re mlk: no matter how hard you try to spin it, the king family won in a court of law, and the justice department had to save face by forming a website to counter the king family with old / rehashed arguments. again, you have the right to remain a moron.


this is not a debate. this was more along the lines of... teaching you a lesson. i am rather interested in how that crow tastes once you do have the guts to google america's involvement in overthrowing iran ...

 

[Cogman]

i'm still not giving you a link. you have the right to remain a moron. everyone on this forum but you knows that the american government staged a coup to overthrow iran enjoy your crow when you decide to grow up and look that up.

re mlk: no matter how hard you try to spin it, the king family won in a court of law, and the justice department had to save face by forming a website to counter the king family with old / rehashed arguments. again, you have the right to remain a moron.


this is not a debate. this was more along the lines of... teaching you a lesson. i am rather interested in how that crow tastes once you do have the guts to google america's involvement in overthrowing iran ...

Idiot. The order of the court of law for the MLK thing was to hold AN OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION. And the results of said investigation were inconclusive.

As for the Iran thing. Nope, your right on that one and the torrin thing. I'm not trying to debate those I'm freely willing and able to admit that my knowledge on the history of those events was lacking.

More specifically I'm going after the above listed items. jfk. 9/11. mlk. oklahoma city. twa flight 800. . iraq 2 and trying to teach you what the word "admitted" means. As for people siding with you. Name one. I haven't seen them in this thread.

Your not giving me a link because you don't have one and can't get one.

 

[jman19]

says the liar and fact denier? the us government has already admitted it lied and initially covered up a few of the events i listed.

try again.

"a few of"

Here comes the back peddling!

 

[Hacp]

So what other country was firing a chinese made torpedo?

Either the Chinese or the Russians.

 

[Nebor]

not really. the us and its allies have no credibility as shown. the intitial investigation is a whitewash if it doesn't include "non-allies". and lol at the pen marking evidence.

No credibility? If the US Government admitted to the overthrow of the Iranian government, that seems pretty honest and straight forward. I mean, they admitted it, right? That's got to be worth some credit.

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Honestly I think US sank SK ship. The evidence provided by US was somewhat silly. German made torpedo with Korean writing where Korean number 1 was spelled out very badly I might add. If NK wanted to hide the fact or even deny the fact why put writing in their torpedo and spell it like a foreigner would spell it? What's up with German torpedo? Here I thought US and her allies use German torpedo.

Look at all the American muppets chanting NK regime change. That's proof enough US was behind the attack to point their fingers NK.

You're an idiot. Seriously, you've been amusing for awhile, but now your act is wearing thin. Yes, I said act, because I can't believe anyone is seriously that stupid as to believe North Korea propaganda while sitting comfortably in the US enjoying freedom here. Seriously, quoting yet another article by a clown "PhD" from North Korea who is acknowledged as Kim's unofficial spokesperson? That is the best you have? Quoting someone from a nation where freedom of speech does not exist? LOL

If, on the other hand, I'm wrong and you SERIOUSLY believe the drivel you post, please put your money where your mouth is and move to North Korea. You won't, of course, because you're a coward and a hypocrite. You'll make some lame excuse like "I'm am free to be here!!!," ignoring, of course, that your heroes in NK have no such freedoms available to them. What a moron.