Heh. The pissing & moaning from the usual haters is epic.
When Faux News reports that Russia is reportedly changing her stance, what does that mean?
It means there's a whole lot of un-sourced speculation with an agenda....
-snip-
It might be helpful to read the news occasionally.
"Reportedly change"?
http://www.google.com/hostednews/af...Id=64f5a2e8-2b9e-45c2-822d-3299d59e6ff2&hl=en
Here's a quick google. This isn't just some invention or spin by Fox News:
https://www.google.com/search?q=rus...fficial&client=firefox-a&channel=np&source=hp
Fern
Neocon media manipulators made JK and Obama spew all the embarrassing bluster?
Heh. The pissing & moaning from the usual haters is epic.
When Faux News reports that Russia is reportedly changing her stance, what does that mean?
Thank you for that. I had the sense to doubt it, because it's Fox, whereas the OP instantly believed it, because it's Fox.
Go figure.
I don't know - what does it mean when ABC reports it?
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/russia-warns-west-change-stance-iran-22973183
Oh, that's right, all you ever seem capable of doing is bashing Republicans, bashing Fox News. What are you capable of doing when your niche argument doesn't fit?
Next time you decide to be lazy and loud, be lazy and loud somewhere else. We're not your personal google servants.
Russia's stance isn't really important other than in defending a failed hard line position we'll have to abandon, anyway.
I should Google it? Quite the contrary. The OP needs to provide credible links in the first place & we can deal with it from there.
Heh. The pissing & moaning from the usual haters is epic.
When Faux News reports that Russia is reportedly changing her stance, what does that mean?
It means there's a whole lot of un-sourced speculation with an agenda....
Crimea? All over but the shouting. It was all over before the Neocon media manipulators fluffed it up for their own purposes, because neither we nor the Europeans are stupid enough to take any action to the contrary. Crimeans get the safety of the Russian Federation, and Ukrainians get to deal with mobs in the streets in Kiev. Which is where it all started, anyway.
You never know, but I doubt that even the proto fascists in the Ukrainian govt are dumb enough to start shooting. How'd it come to this? Because Ukrainian ultra-nationalists were begging for it, and because in yo' face stupid doesn't impress Putin.
TR acted the same way about Panama, and there wasn't a fucking thing anybody could do about that, either. Which is not to even mention other more recent interventions in Latin America.
Please explain to me how Russia's stance is not important when they can veto any and all new sanctions against Iran.
Neocon media manipulators made JK and Obama spew all the embarrassing bluster?
The problem is not that Obama is doing nothing. The problem is that he's acting like he can do something. It completely destroys our credibility when our leader starts issuing empty threats.As incompetent as our dear leader is, I don't think there's a whole lot he could have done differently in this scenario. We simply don't have the power to compel Russia or China to do what we want them to do.
The Atreus21 challenge:
Go look around Pravda. Compare to Jhhhn's post. See if you can distinguish between them.
Russia's stance is not important?
Remind me, who are the permanent members of the UN security council?
If I remember right, doesn't Russia have veto power at the UN security council?
Please explain to me how Russia's stance is not important when they can veto any and all new sanctions against Iran.
It is not your place to tell me what news sites I can and can not link to.
If you disagree with the news, then post a rebuttal. This "I dont believe anything foxnews says" is not a rebuttal.
Huff post also posted the same article. But since huffpost is a far left radical rabid liberal website, I do not like to link to them.
How is Putin playing with a weak hand?
That is meant as a serious question.
If anything, helping Iran changes the whole middle east / global peace issue. Israel has been talking about striking Iran. Russia starts sending trainloads of supplies to Iran, this destabilizes the middle east by proxy.
Putin could start a new war in the middle east without ever having to lift a finger, and a war he is not involved in.
On the other hand, we would be drawn into any conflict that involved Israel.
Putin would laugh all the way to the bank for trading nuclear technology for gold.
Putin has a very strong hand in that he could contribute to a conflict, step back and watch all the fun on CNN.
Unless they find a way to invade friggen Florida we will not be going to war with another ME country in the next decade or so. At BEST we will supply Israel with some more military hardware and let them do the fighting. Lucky for us Israel is perfectly willing to do just that.
